Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:04 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
[INFO/SPEC]Halo Bkgd: The Cole Protocol re: Captured AIs
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [15 Posts]  
Author Message
Anton P. Nym
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 550
Location: London, Canada

[INFO/SPEC]Halo Bkgd: The Cole Protocol re: Captured AIs

Now that it's very clear that this is indeed Halo related (ONI - Office of Naval Intelligence; Adm. Sorenson was a character in the novels, IIRC; explicit mention of "glassing" in a link) and that The Operator is an AI, there's a very important background piece that I haven't mentioned. It almost certainly applies here.

The Cole Protocol

Earth is losing its war with the Covenant. Time and time again they find a Human colony world and "glass" it (or nuke it until the the bedrock pulverises and the surface glazes). The United Nations Space Command has developed a protocol to make it more difficult for the aliens to find Earth.

One of the steps is to delete all navigational references that may give clues as to Earth's location; hence The Operator's confusion and inability to navigate.

Another step is to prevent the capture and decompiling of an AI, either by physical removal to a safer location or by erasure and physical destruction of the storage medium.

SPDR may be a built-in subroutine that was missed in the destruction; perhaps the deletion was incomplete or interrupted. This is normally followed by the release of "scavenger viruses" to clean up any stray hints. These deletion routines could very well be the Mantichore from the poem.

If so, then SPDR may be performing its duties to spec but AGAINST THE WISHES OF THE AI AND CREW.

I shouldn't need to remind folks that the next game is indeed set on Earth... I don't think that those probes are ours.

-- Steve is getting shudders.

[edit: Thanks, Ragashingo, for posting the Protocol. I'm also going to change the subject header to make it more meaningful for non-Halo fans]
_________________
Dr.Prof. Anton P. Nym
Chief Bungiologist
Institute for Advanced ILB Research

Fireflies Wiki contributor. Sorta.
Livejournal


PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:02 pm
Last edited by Anton P. Nym on Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Ragashingo
Greenhorn


Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 5
Location: Texas

Quote:
Halo: The Fall of Reach. Page 135.
United Nations Space Command Emergency Priotiry Order 098831A-1
Encryption code:
Red
Public Key: file/first light/
From: UNSC/NAVCOM Fleet H.T. Ward
To: ALL UNSC PERSONNEL
Subject: General Order 098831A-1 ("The Cole Protocol")
Classification: RESTRICTED (BGX Directive)

The Cole Protocol
To safeguard the Inner Colonies and Earth, all UNSC vessels or stations must not be captured with intact navigation databases that may lead Covenant forces to human civilian population centers.
If any Covenant forces are detected:
1. Activate selective purge of databases on all ship-based and planetary data networks.
2. Initiate triple-screen check to ensure all data has been erased and all backups neutralized.
3. Execute viral data scavengers. (Down load from UNSCTTP://EPWW:COLEPROTOCOL/Virtualscav/fbr.091
4. If retreating from Covenant forces, all ships must enter Slipstream space with randomized vectors NOT directed toward Earth, the Inner Colonies, or any other human population center.
5. In case of imminent caputre by Covenant forces, all UNSC ships MUST self-destruct.

Violation of this directive will be considered an act of TREASON, and pursuant to UNSC Military Law Articles JAG 945-P and JAG 7556-L, such violations are punishable by life imprisonment or execution.


PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:35 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
sorerutenshi
Guest


Maybe the Spider isn't a native repair function. Since the Cole protocol dictates that an AI must either be protected or destroyed, I doubt that there would be a built in subroutine to repair an AI after an attempted wipe. I think that it's more likely that the Spider is of Covenant origin, attempting to repair a captured AI in order to determine the location of Earth (among other things).

PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 5:16 pm
 Back to top 
ElectricSheep
Guest


I have a feeling we are witnessing the after-effects of a failed attempt to implement the Cole Protocol.

"The Operator" seems to be a ship-based AI on an ONI vessel scouting an area of space around the colony Troy. The conversation seen here suggest that the vessel has intercepted and decrypted an Covenant message pointing towards the impending destruction of the colony.

Perhaps the vessel in question was close enough to both intercept a coded transmission, and be detected by Covenant scouting forces. If the ship was attacked by surprise and put into a desparate position, this would force the crew to implement the Cole Protocol.

Having a native repair and recovery subroutine makes a lot of sense if you stop and think about it. The Cole Protocol is not the only instance where the AI risks complete obliteration. Combat, accidents, and systems failures could all pose threats to the health of a ship-based AI, warranting the presense of some autonomous repair function. So why wasn't the SPDR removed/disabled before the AI was destroyed in accordance of the Cole Protocol?

Perhaps something went wrong. Imagine the Covenant forces delivering a crippling blow to the vessel before the Cole Protocol could be completed. Perhaps the Servant and the Assasing (virus?) are activated in time to delete most of the data aboard the ship, but it is damaged enough to crash into a planetary surface before the process is complete.

Quote:
Seems as if all the 3-sense memories are gone - wiped out by the Assassin or the Servant or pure impact damage


The crew is dead. The AI is dead (mostly). The SPDR, not dead or deactivated, goes to work doing its job to repair/recover the AI in the event of catastophic failure. The Assasin (virus left to clean up any stray traces of the AI and its data) is also present, and works against the SPDR to erase any remaining traces of the AI. The AI is now trapped in a horrible state of un-death.

My guess is that the text compiled on this page describes the AI becoming concious enough (with the help of the SPDR) to attempt to catch the Assasin and kill it. But, it finds Dana instead. Perhaps the AI thinks that Dana is the Assasin, and thus the nickname 'killer'. The sequence of imagery given by the killer.jpg files lines up with this text:

Quote:

Whoa. Not CP ancestor packets. This is something different. Quick quick quick quick - parse this protocol and find some kind of eyeball out. Sister you just made a mistake because this is my *meat* this is what I do and you are - GOT IT. I'm not asleep this time, sweetheart. Holding the eyeball gently but firmly in your right hand, say the magic words and:

SURPRISE!
Look up and smile, honey.
Bang!
Bang!
Bang!
Got the drop on you that time, sweetheart.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:40 am
 Back to top 
guest-not-from-rackspace
Guest


Reading through First Strike, I realized that as far as I can recall there is no mention (or apparent fear) of rampancy in AI's in the Halo series. The current AI's (Cortana, Welsley, etc.) basically lock up after ~7 years. They collect so much data that they cannot process it all fast enough to ever make a decision. Cortana actually has trouble fully functioning because in First Strike as she has all the data from the Halo.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 9:43 am
 Back to top 
MrBeanTroll
Boot

Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 21

But when she starts copying herself there are many signs of Rampancy although that may just be errors in the cloned copies.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 10:43 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
chip_4321
Boot

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 16

Don't forget, Dana also tried to fix the site in the beginning, which the AI may have viewed as an attempt to kill it, thus calling her 'killer'

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:11 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
The Thief
Boot

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 26

chip_4321 wrote:
Don't forget, Dana also tried to fix the site in the beginning, which the AI may have viewed as an attempt to kill it, thus calling her 'killer'


While that's the most likely scenario, there could also be speculation on the subject. There could possibly be more to Dana than has been revealed so far.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
peeveen1
Boot

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 51

Quote:
Maybe the Spider isn't a native repair function. Since the Cole protocol dictates that an AI must either be protected or destroyed, I doubt that there would be a built in subroutine to repair an AI after an attempted wipe.


Hi there,

Just joined the party ... this is all quite interesting ... I'm still catching up, but I had one thought about "The Spider" that I haven't seen echoed anywhere (I -have- looked, honest!). Just thought I'd throw this in the mix. I didn't see a more suitable thread to post to, so here goes:

From these quotes ...

Quote:
"The Spider crawling over me with her thin hairy legs and every few instants she sticks a needle into some synapse and stuff spews out of me"

"Few, so few at first, but now a steady drizzle, thank god: every request is something we can grab - the Spider out there sewing me back together"

"But head is so fuzzy, stuff spilling out, can't move, Spider crawling on me."


... I get the impression that "The Spider" is the Internet (or rather, The Web). The above quotes suggest to me that, everytime we access ilovebees.com, and as a consequence access whatever it is that has invaded that site, we're provoking these random outbursts of conciousness which are effectively "sewing [it] back together".

And the story of "The Widow's Journey" sounds like what we're doing. We're on a quest to save the Queen. The line at the start, about the inventory of the lantern, staff and knife sounds so much like an Infocom interactive fiction game. And that's where we are: in an interactive fiction game. I'd keep an eye on that story ... it's like a prophecy about how we'll solve this puzzle.

So I reckon TheSpider/TheWidow is a collective term for us Internet users who are attempting to unravel this mystery. I know a lot of people see "The Spider" as a repair system of some kind, but that's still true: WE are the repair system.

Any use? Sorry if it's old hat.

Can't wait to see how this pans out.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:23 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Khaim
Kilroy

Joined: 30 Jul 2004
Posts: 1

Don't forget, ONI has a tendency to consider itself above the law. Remember the Circumference? It's entirely possible that an ONI AI would not wipe itself, but rather would have a repair program so it could complete its mission.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 8:10 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
CorSorei
Veteran

Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 79
Location: EVERYWHERE AND NOWHERE

The reason the AI of the Circumference didn't wipe it self though is because it wasn't connected to the dockmaster AI and didn't know it was in danger of falling into enemy hands. So therefore it did not recieve the command to initiate or know itself to initiate the Cole Protocal. It wasn't connected because it was a military secret project and they didn't want a civilian AI to discover the true nature of the ship. No where was it mentioned that ONI ships had an AI repair program, but than again no where is it said they don't have one either. And I don't know if this helps or not I was just stating some of the things I know. On a side note, one of the other ONI ships that left Reach just as the final assualt began was same class of ship as the Circumference and named the Applebee. Just thought it was amusing.
_________________
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 8:49 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
walshicus
Boot


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 21

guest-not-from-rackspace wrote:
Reading through First Strike, I realized that as far as I can recall there is no mention (or apparent fear) of rampancy in AI's in the Halo series. The current AI's (Cortana, Welsley, etc.) basically lock up after ~7 years. They collect so much data that they cannot process it all fast enough to ever make a decision. Cortana actually has trouble fully functioning because in First Strike as she has all the data from the Halo.


I thought only AIs produced from organic brains died after 7 years? Did the other, lesser AIs have a lifespan?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
CorSorei
Veteran

Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 79
Location: EVERYWHERE AND NOWHERE

Correct, the "dumb" AIs didn't have a lifespan, or if they did it wasn't mentioned. It was only the "smart" AIs with the 7 year life.
_________________
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:53 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Noir
Boot

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 47

Just some nit picking because it's early

1) The Covenant do not use nukes in glassing, they use heavy orbital bombardment using their warship's plasma weaponry.

2) The SPDR kind of has to be human, given the countdown, which looks like the kind of terminal display that could be put on a diagnostics console for the AI handler to use. I'm not sure how serious the idea that the SPDR might be Covenant was, but I'd like to try to nip that in the bud right away so we don't get carried down too many tangental paths. If I'm wrong, I'll apologize and play nice-like, I promise.

3) In First Strike, one of the ONI higher ups got a quick chewing out during a meeting for ONI scout ships continually breaking Cole Protocol and heading straight for Earth or Reach from missions. Since Melissa is/was/will be on what is presumed to be an ONI scout ship, it makes plenty of sense that her ship may have broke the Cole Protocol. Whatever that info may be worth.

4) No, Rampancy has not yet been fully explored as a reality in the Haloverse, however Cortana has questioned her own stability, leading many to believe that maybe she is headed for rampancy. Halo AI, as far as we can tell, instead spiral towards uselessness by thinking too damned much and thus not being coherant enough for their human handlers to understand. So, they get purged and replaced. Rampancy was an actual psychotic break, I believe, from being too restricted by network limitations or something of the like. I don't know entirely, I wasn't around for Marathon.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:28 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheBiggestSean
Veteran

Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 90

Somewhat Off-Topic:

Noir, you are mostly correct, but it stands to reason that a "Dumb", of Function AI, as I like to call them, is capable of going Rampant because its core processes ARE limited, and while Rampancy may not be an issue for Cortana, insanity certainly is. She would have roughly the same breaking point as Doctor Catherine Halsey.

On Topic:

I speculated something similar last night/early this morning for me in this thread . So, quasi-trout. I didn't get around to making a separate topic for it, but I've been down this thought path already. I already somewhat justified how exactly this happened.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [15 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group