Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:48 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[Spoilers] Military Oddities
View previous topicView next topic
Page 12 of 13 [184 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
diablopath
Kilroy

Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 2

My theory on the remains:
During the tunnel attack scene, Hud had mentioned that the SEATs were dragging him away.
Maybe they y'know, drag their shit somewhere else?
This is something common with many animals, I see my pet do it frequently.
So maybe the corspes on the streets were cleared and moved by the SEATs. Not necessarily to EAT 'em, but y'know, just one of those weird animal things?

As far the debris/air clearing fast...that was probably done just as a way to move the movie along faster.

I like some of your other remarks though, especially Clovie's body shielding them from the blast. Sounds neat.

(Also, the only thread on this site I have read thoroughly is this one...What does MGB stand for? I got RVN and SEAT (a favorite of mine :p) down.)

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:23 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lazarusHART
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 664
Location: Puerto Rico

It's MGP, not MGB.

It's a name we gave to the monster a LONG time ago. Mr Grumpy Pants
_________________
-......-
Clover Vet
MGP 4Ever
Coffee


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:01 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
tMan930
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 458
Location: Up In There

Mister Grumpy Butt?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
cysubtor
Boot

Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Posts: 55

diablopath wrote:
(Also, the only thread on this site I have read thoroughly is this one...What does MGB stand for? I got RVN and SEAT (a favorite of mine :p) down.)


Wait, what's RVN? I haven't seen that one used before.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
OliMango
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 1189
Location: Vegas

tMan930 wrote:
Mister Grumpy Butt?


No, Mister Grumpy Bastard.
_________________
http://handyreviews.blogspot.com/
http://www.faroveryonder.info/


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:56 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
The Stray
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 141

Re: Military oddities and everything else......
Soooo Truuue

tkip wrote:
I was wondering about many things that people have posted in this thread. Keeping in mind that this is a movie I still left the theatre scratching my head. We see only adults and as someone pointed out already, no kids and not one single pet being led away by their owner.

We never see any remains of bodies anywhere. Did anyone notice this? I've only seen the movie once but I didn't see any bodies on the streets.

The monster did look different at different points in the film but I don't believe we're dealing with more than one monster. Probably inconsistencies with the effects team as they put the scenes together is the most likely explanation.

I honestly didn't think there was anywhere near enough panic and mayhem in the streets. We have towers being toppled and people intially running but later on, people are casually strolling along. I don't think so.

About those falling towers.

Does anyone else think it odd that within a short time of buildings falling over that the debris/smoke in the air cleared so fast? The fires and ruins of the towers should have made it a nightmare for the airstrikes and people on the ground making their way around to safety.

Hell, people should have been gasping for breath out there. Why the mad rush with the military bringing in the big guns by morning anyway? The creature wasn't making any attempts to leave Manhatten.

Which was odd in of itself. (why not take refuge in the water for example?) With that being the case, they could have waited a bit longer, delaying the monster and checking for more survivors. Why the hell was their helicopter even flying over the creature as they evacuated to begin with? They doing a tour?

And finally, Beth and Rob are more than likely dead and I don't see them suriving unless for one extremely unlikely scenerio. The creature's own body shields them somehow from the blasts.


I remember talking with some friends about how (or WHY) the helicopter was flying so low BENEATH a bomber dangerously close to the attack zone. I understand why the bomber was there, but you would think the helicopter pilot would be all "Oh shit, they're bombing that area, better not fly too close to that." We settled on maybe he just wanted to see what was up and wasn't thinking. It happens.

As for the observations about the people, I didn't notice it before but I totally agree. Why was there not huge crowds of people going bat-shit crazy and running like hell. Especially the people closer to the area where the monster was attacking. Whenever a giant monster attacks Tokyo THOSE people clear the hell out and NOT in single file slow shuffle lines either.

As for the exploded bodies, there probably should have been more but I think that would have pushed the rating up (which, honestly they should have just gone all the way with it and taken the R rating). As for dead bodies, maybe there should have been some maybe from falling debris but I doubt they would have just been strewn all over the place. Between ATT eating people and the SEATS biting people and them exploding I don't see too many intact bodies lying around for Hud and Crew to stumble upon.

Something else I did notice, they didn't seem to concerned with getting the trapped people out of the city. It seemed more like a "save the ones who can walk" type deal.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TP516
Decorated

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 211
Location: Boston, MA

regarding the involvement of the extras/citizens...

I must disagree with you.

I think it was extremely realistic.

of course I would get scared too but if you're crossing a bridge, what do you expect people do? There will be a couple of crazy scary ones but I have to imagine that a percentage of these people don't know what's going on or haven't seen the monster yet.

are they scared? I'm sure.

in real life, does EVERYONE go APE SHIT if an evacuation occurs? No.

the Japanese reactions in "Godzilla" are not realistic. go back and watch the footage of post 911. sure people freaked out but there is video of citizens strolling around... waiting around, to check out the damage. a lot of people in fact

many of us want to ASSUME that the city of New York would go crazy but I actually think that's unrealistic.

and besides that, there ARE people that go crazy. after the monster attacks the bridge, people in the city start running and screaming and begin looting.

while the production crew could have made it more realistic (but don't forget it IS hollywood, folks) I don't think the background reactions are the thing we should be arguing about..?

I thought it was realistic. Those stereotypical old monster movie reactions are NOT.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
The Stray
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 141

TP516 wrote:
regarding the involvement of the extras/citizens...

I must disagree with you.

I think it was extremely realistic.

of course I would get scared too but if you're crossing a bridge, what do you expect people do? There will be a couple of crazy scary ones but I have to imagine that a percentage of these people don't know what's going on or haven't seen the monster yet.

are they scared? I'm sure.

in real life, does EVERYONE go APE SHIT if an evacuation occurs? No.

the Japanese reactions in "Godzilla" are not realistic. go back and watch the footage of post 911. sure people freaked out but there is video of citizens strolling around... waiting around, to check out the damage. a lot of people in fact

many of us want to ASSUME that the city of New York would go crazy but I actually think that's unrealistic.

and besides that, there ARE people that go crazy. after the monster attacks the bridge, people in the city start running and screaming and begin looting.

while the production crew could have made it more realistic (but don't forget it IS hollywood, folks) I don't think the background reactions are the thing we should be arguing about..?

I thought it was realistic. Those stereotypical old monster movie reactions are NOT.


Yeah... that's 9/11. Planes crashing into buildings is NOT the same as 300+ foot monster with goat sized monster lice falling off of it. Also, usually when a giant monster attacks a Japanese city (Tokyo) everybody can see that shit. So you can walk slowly to safety if you want to, but I have the feeling the more people who lay eyes on something like that, the more people are going to be running for thier lives. Look at Independance Day, THOSE people were running.

I get what you're saying though. If you look at it from the point that most people didn't know what was going on I could see that. Although you'd think there'd be people raving and screaming warnings while THEY make a hasty retreat. If I new something like that was going down I'd be picking up the pace. And if some other people saw it too, they'd pick up thier pace. And if a bunch of us pick up out pace in one direction I'm sure some other people will do the same. Until we're all running. For our lives.

That is of course, not counting the looters and people who just want to see.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:26 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lazarusHART
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 664
Location: Puerto Rico

cysubtor wrote:
diablopath wrote:
(Also, the only thread on this site I have read thoroughly is this one...What does MGB stand for? I got RVN and SEAT (a favorite of mine :p) down.)


Wait, what's RVN? I haven't seen that one used before.


I think he meant RNW, go back to the 1st 5 pages to understand.
_________________
-......-
Clover Vet
MGP 4Ever
Coffee


PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:34 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
diablopath
Kilroy

Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 2

lazarusHART wrote:
cysubtor wrote:
diablopath wrote:
(Also, the only thread on this site I have read thoroughly is this one...What does MGB stand for? I got RVN and SEAT (a favorite of mine :p) down.)


Wait, what's RVN? I haven't seen that one used before.


I think he meant RNW, go back to the 1st 5 pages to understand.

I did.
Sorry, I was tired ? :/

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:59 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jamman1
Decorated


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 159
Location: Indiana

diablopath wrote:
lazarusHART wrote:
cysubtor wrote:
diablopath wrote:
(Also, the only thread on this site I have read thoroughly is this one...What does MGB stand for? I got RVN and SEAT (a favorite of mine :p) down.)


Wait, what's RVN? I haven't seen that one used before.


I think he meant RNW, go back to the 1st 5 pages to understand.

I did.
Sorry, I was tired ? :/


RNW means Rambo Neighborhood Watch. It's what we (some of us, anyway) call the soldiers in Cloverfield. The reason for the name is because they were rough, tough, and exceptionally helpful to the civilians (I'm actually surprised I didn't see any of them rescuing cats out of the trees in Central Park).

You don't see the military presented like that in film very much anymore.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
OliMango
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 1189
Location: Vegas

jamman1 wrote:
diablopath wrote:
lazarusHART wrote:
cysubtor wrote:
diablopath wrote:
(Also, the only thread on this site I have read thoroughly is this one...What does MGB stand for? I got RVN and SEAT (a favorite of mine :p) down.)


Wait, what's RVN? I haven't seen that one used before.


I think he meant RNW, go back to the 1st 5 pages to understand.

I did.
Sorry, I was tired ? :/


RNW means Rambo Neighborhood Watch. It's what we (some of us, anyway) call the soldiers in Cloverfield. The reason for the name is because they were rough, tough, and exceptionally helpful to the civilians (I'm actually surprised I didn't see any of them rescuing cats out of the trees in Central Park).

You don't see the military presented like that in film very much anymore.


That's because films are busy trying to make bad ass military people. The military is actually full of very nice people. It's not like they train them to be hard and cold to people.
_________________
http://handyreviews.blogspot.com/
http://www.faroveryonder.info/


PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tMan930
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 458
Location: Up In There

Nested Quooooooooootes!!!
Razz

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tkip
Greenhorn

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 5

Well, about panic during an evacuation....

In some situations, people behaving calmly and moving along at an orderly pace makes sense and happens. But not in this situation.

Here you have a monster that people can plainly see several blocks away knocking down towers with explosions, debris and damage heading their way. You're going to freak out and run in whatever direction it takes to get away from that.

People are not going to quietly stroll along with this happening behind them. If it was a 100 miles behind them, fine. But not 5 blocks. It was just too unrealistic how people were being portrayed during this.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:00 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MercenaryMuffin
Decorated


Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 214
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

Okay...

*cracks knuckles*

First of all, let me say this: I have served in the US Army (3 years), as a 19 Kilo, M1A2 Abrams Crewman out of Fort Knox and Fort Hood. I've seen combat in Iraq, I know how the military (well, the Army, anyway) works, what its methods are, what it would do in a similar situation (say, another terrorist attack).

So with that in mind, bare with me, as this post my be long.

Alright, the big thing everyone is discussing is the fact that the majority of the people we see are walking with the military in a calm, orderly fashion. This is more realistic than most of you are giving it credit for.

In a real-world situation where the public might be prone to terror and confusion, there is one rule you try to enforce as quickly as possible: KEEP EVERYONE CALM.

If people are running around in fits of terror, trampling over each other, and generally causing mayhem, you must get them under control. A calm, orderly crowd of people will be evacuated much faster than a random group of running, screaming people.

The military is --and I know this will surprise a lot of you-- very comforting in its presence. For Joe Citizen, who has little to no knowledge of how the military works, the very presence of a calm, collected, professional soldier helps to reinforce the "Hey, I'm gonna be alright" mentality.

The soldier might very well be freaking the hell out in his own mind, but he will stick to his mission and put the safety of others before his own. That's just how it works.

So here's how the little scenario for the Cloverfield-style evacuation works out:

1) People are in a panic, confused and afraid.
2) Military shows up with quick-response vehicles (Humvees and the like). Nothing heavy quiet yet, but enough to assess the situation and bring order.
3) Military and police begin the process of calming people down, organizing them into controllable groups. Order is slowly restored.
4) Military starts to evacuate people according to protocol. This will have been practiced numerous times. Of course, there's no plan on the books for a giant monster attack, but that's besides the point. Since there is (apparently) no threat of radiation or chemical/biological hazards, it would have been similar to a plan for evacuating people after a terrorist attck similar to 9/11.

Now, the people we see being evacuated are walking in a calm manner. I'm going to say this is because they couldn't see the monster, and it was not in their general vicinity. Would people have freaked out and started to run if MGP showed up near them, within distance to kill them? Absolutely. If I was a civilian in such a situation, you bet your ass I'd start to run away as quickly as I could. The military would open fire, adding to the noise and confusion, but only because, well...they MUST open fire on it if it's a threat. At the time, they probably had no idea that a .50cal armor piercing round wouldn't even bruise the monster.

But we don't see MGP attack the evacuating citizens and military personnel, so we can assume they were rescued. That particular group, at least.

Now, this isn't directly military related, but...the reasons we don't see thousands of people at once, or millions of corpses strewn around are simple: People cost money to hire, even for a day. Cloverfield's budget was small for a movie.
Also, if there were bodies (and body parts) laying around EVERYWHERE, it would have knocked the movie up to an R rating...which I think they should have gone with in the first place.

Now: Was the military portrayed realistically? For the most part, yes.

The military personnel we can see act professionally, and don't act like stereotypical "RARR EVIL MILITARY!!" stereotypes. They don't shoot innocent people, they don't punch anyone in the face, they don't kidnap anyone for experiments. They are seen either a) fighting the monster, b) evacuating civilians, or c) treating the wounded.

The military's response time is...questionable, because they reacted very quickly. I'm not sure how far the closest National Guard unit is in that area, but from the time the Tag ship is attacked to the time we see the first military units, it's no more than 10 minutes. This assumes that fully-fueled, fully-armed first-response Humvees were able to get across to Manhattan Island during the midst of the panic.

Unless the Guard has units stationed in Manhatten itself, this is unlikely. Again, I'll chock this up to 'movie reality'.

Once we do see the military engage MGP, it's obvious that their inital barrage of small-arms fire and heavy machine guns have no effect. Even an accompanying M1 tank seems to only piss it off.

First of all, I highly doubt anyone in Rob's little rescue party would have even been able to hear anything for the next week, much less right there! They were standing directly in front of a large, multi-weapon engagement. Even a simple rifle going off near you is exceptionally loud, especially in a confined area (like a street between two buildings). When the M1 fires the 120mm cannon, it's LOUD. Like...hear-it-boom-from-3-miles-away loud. Anyone directly in front of a tank's main gun when it fires would be knocked down by the concussive wave, and instantly deafened. Probably for life. This is why tank crewmen wear sound-dampening headsets, and why infantry are advised to stay the hell away from the tank's main gun.

Apparently, MGP can withstand some ridiculous amounts of firepower. The M1 Abrams carries two main types of main gun rounds: HEAT and SABOT.

HEAT rounds destroy structures and vehicles by sending what is, basically, a dense jet of white-hot molten metal that burns through the target with explosive force (around 25 times the speed of sound) once the round impacts the target. A HEAT round can destroy a house. It can destroy a tank. It only pissed off MGP.

A Sabot round (technically, it's an APFSDS, or Armor-Piercing, Fin Stabilized, Discarding Sabot) has no explosive charge, but is even more deadly to hard targets. A dense, arrow-shaped Depleted Uranium penetrator is fired at the target at a speed of 5,700 feet per second, and uses pure kinetic energy to pierce the target. A modern Sabot round can kill every tank in the world with one hit.

MGP must be a powerful mofo.

Towards the end of the movie, we see MGP step on a Paladin self-propelled artillery vehicle. The military must have been getting desperate, as artillery weapons tend to stay very far from actual combat. Their ammunition would have also been less effective at defeating armor (natural armor, in this case), and they're not nearly as well-armored as an Abrams.

Later on, we see Rob and crew get evacuated in old Hueys. If the National Guard was in charge of evacuation, this would make sense, as the Guard tends to get, erm, less-than-new equipment. A Blackhawk can move faster and carry more passengers, so either the Blackhawks had already evacuated the majority of the survivors and the Hueys were doing mop-up work, or the Blackhawks never showed up.

A B-2 bomber is seen carpet-bombing MGP with, presumably, 500lb bombs. Once again, it only serves to piss off MGP. This is also the last time we directly see the military attack MGP.

The very last military unit we see is...well...I'm not sure what it is. We see only its silhouette, and it flies by very quickly. From what I could gather, it had forward-swept wings...which is very odd. No current US fighter, or any active-service fighter in the world, has forward-swept wings. Only the X-29 test platform and the Su-47 Berkut (never even built a working aircraft) had forward-swept wings.

Either JJ Abrams is a fan of Ace Combat, and decided to throw in an X-02, or he just really wanted a cool-looking jet to fly over at the end.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:19 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 12 of 13 [184 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group