Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 17, 2024 5:28 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Find the Lost Ring
[ARTIFACTS] Second stories
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 3 [35 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
snurge
Boot

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 30

[/quote]

On the painting you can read:
"...the Original Painting in the Collection of..."
Unfortunatley I can't read the rest. I asked Markus about a better picture some time ago. He replied that he has not a better picture. Then he wanted to send me the text, but has never done so (sometimes he answers emails, but the most time I do not get an reply Sad)[/quote]

Ok, so i was getting wound up by this painting and trying to locate it.
After scouring the Cardiff City hall website, reviewing every picture i could see, i decided to bite the bullet and try and get some information by calling Cardiff City Hall.
I spoke to a really nice Welsh gentlemen for about 15 minutes who proceeded to tell me that he'd been working for the City Hall since 1993 and he's never heard of this painting, nor the title or anything that might look like it (yes i described it to him too).
He has given me a few other leads as to where it might be if it was there before 1993 (which it can't have been if Markus took the picture recently) or if it was moved during the time when the city hall was closed during 1997 for a refurbishment. I will check these to try and find it.

This does however bring forward the point that Markus 'could' be feeding us iffy information.
How do you suggest that we proceed with this from here? Should we contact Markus with this information and see what this brings or do you think that we need to keep the fact that we know this from him?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
snurge
Boot

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 30

I have finally managed to find the "Hercules and Omphale" picture online.
I dont know if this will help or hinder but the artist looks to be "Gustave Boulanger". Also, the dates of the 'prints' i've found seem to be from before the suggested 1887 date.

Here is a link to a print i found (although its only Ebay..there are a couple of prints here) http://tinyurl.com/5s37wl or http://tinyurl.com/5cxzk9

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:15 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Weezel
Unfettered


Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Location: National Park, NJ

snurge wrote:
I have finally managed to find the "Hercules and Omphale" picture online.
I dont know if this will help or hinder but the artist looks to be "Gustave Boulanger". Also, the dates of the 'prints' i've found seem to be from before the suggested 1887 date.

Here is a link to a print i found (although its only Ebay..there are a couple of prints here) http://tinyurl.com/5s37wl or http://tinyurl.com/5cxzk9


Wow.. tenacious on finding that! Good work.
_________________
Wiki: FTLR
Blog: If Chaos Was Organized


PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:08 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
danteIL
Unfictologist


Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 1990

I am impressed.. calling Cardiff and everything... good job!

So are we supposed to:

a) accept what Markus told us on face value, because it is important to the story that there is a painting about Hercules and Omphale in the Cardiff City Hall from 1887, even though none of that is apparently true?

b) realize that Markus is lying to us completely and start to look for hidden motives (I'm already suspicious)?

c) perhaps believe that Markus is not the best reader of English, so perhaps he got confused when he took the photo of the painting?


Like all of this 'second story' stuff, it isn't clear what we are supposed to think.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:18 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lhall
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 411
Location: Portland, Oregon

I also just got a reply back with the same result:

"This is the first time I have heard of this painting, it isn't on display at City Hall anymore try the National Museum of Wales as we did display a lot of their artwork until 1997 when we returned it to them."

So, who knows!
_________________
Visit me online or on Twitter.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:24 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
AUZ505
Unfictologist


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1599
Location: Germany

snurge wrote:
I have finally managed to find the "Hercules and Omphale" picture online.
I dont know if this will help or hinder but the artist looks to be "Gustave Boulanger". Also, the dates of the 'prints' i've found seem to be from before the suggested 1887 date.

Here is a link to a print i found (although its only Ebay..there are a couple of prints here) http://tinyurl.com/5s37wl or http://tinyurl.com/5cxzk9


I am really interested, how you found it. I gave up searching.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jasper
Unfettered


Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Texas

danteIL wrote:
I am impressed.. calling Cardiff and everything... good job!

So are we supposed to:

a) accept what Markus told us on face value, because it is important to the story that there is a painting about Hercules and Omphale in the Cardiff City Hall from 1887, even though none of that is apparently true?

b) realize that Markus is lying to us completely and start to look for hidden motives (I'm already suspicious)?

c) perhaps believe that Markus is not the best reader of English, so perhaps he got confused when he took the photo of the painting?


Like all of this 'second story' stuff, it isn't clear what we are supposed to think.


This is the same kind of inquiry I was raising with Eli Hunt about the bronze artifact he found as a 10 year old child. It is supposed to be in "the museum" supposedly at Olympia. . . but I don't think any such artifact exists IRL, and if it does, it surely wasn't made by ancient Greeks. I think that artifact exists IG only and for the purposes of this story. I'm tempted to to say the same for this painting- that it doesn't really have to be in Cardiff City Hall any more than Ariadne's codex pages had to be taped under a desk drawer there.

But distrusting Markus makes sense too. It might finally give some meaning to his discovering this painting in the first place.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:25 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
AUZ505
Unfictologist


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1599
Location: Germany

jasper wrote:
danteIL wrote:
I am impressed.. calling Cardiff and everything... good job!

So are we supposed to:

a) accept what Markus told us on face value, because it is important to the story that there is a painting about Hercules and Omphale in the Cardiff City Hall from 1887, even though none of that is apparently true?

b) realize that Markus is lying to us completely and start to look for hidden motives (I'm already suspicious)?

c) perhaps believe that Markus is not the best reader of English, so perhaps he got confused when he took the photo of the painting?


Like all of this 'second story' stuff, it isn't clear what we are supposed to think.


This is the same kind of inquiry I was raising with Eli Hunt about the bronze artifact he found as a 10 year old child. It is supposed to be in "the museum" supposedly at Olympia. . . but I don't think any such artifact exists IRL, and if it does, it surely wasn't made by ancient Greeks. I think that artifact exists IG only and for the purposes of this story. I'm tempted to to say the same for this painting- that it doesn't really have to be in Cardiff City Hall any more than Ariadne's codex pages had to be taped under a desk drawer there.

But distrusting Markus makes sense too. It might finally give some meaning to his discovering this painting in the first place.


I do not like it if such things are not true in real life, then they should really stick to the fictional line, e.g. Eli destroyed the statue, or presenting a pure fictional statue or finding the painting hidden behind another one.... What I am normally really fascinated about args is that you can find the game related objects in reality. Else it is just some alternate fiction game Smile

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:42 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lhall
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 411
Location: Portland, Oregon

AUZ505 wrote:
jasper wrote:
danteIL wrote:
I am impressed.. calling Cardiff and everything... good job!

So are we supposed to:

a) accept what Markus told us on face value, because it is important to the story that there is a painting about Hercules and Omphale in the Cardiff City Hall from 1887, even though none of that is apparently true?

b) realize that Markus is lying to us completely and start to look for hidden motives (I'm already suspicious)?

c) perhaps believe that Markus is not the best reader of English, so perhaps he got confused when he took the photo of the painting?


Like all of this 'second story' stuff, it isn't clear what we are supposed to think.


This is the same kind of inquiry I was raising with Eli Hunt about the bronze artifact he found as a 10 year old child. It is supposed to be in "the museum" supposedly at Olympia. . . but I don't think any such artifact exists IRL, and if it does, it surely wasn't made by ancient Greeks. I think that artifact exists IG only and for the purposes of this story. I'm tempted to to say the same for this painting- that it doesn't really have to be in Cardiff City Hall any more than Ariadne's codex pages had to be taped under a desk drawer there.

But distrusting Markus makes sense too. It might finally give some meaning to his discovering this painting in the first place.


I do not like it if such things are not true in real life, then they should really stick to the fictional line, e.g. Eli destroyed the statue, or presenting a pure fictional statue or finding the painting hidden behind another one.... What I am normally really fascinated about args is that you can find the game related objects in reality. Else it is just some alternate fiction game Smile


I like it when they're real, as well. However, this was from the ebay description and it seems to be in our correct time period:

Quote:
This is a print completed shortly after the Paris Exposition of 1889 by Gebbie & Husson Co. Ltd (London, England). Some slight foxing around the background of the print - but none near the print itself. Includes a sheet with the detail of the owner & the artist when it was completed in 1889.

_________________
Visit me online or on Twitter.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:48 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
snurge
Boot

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 30

AUZ505 wrote:

I am really interested, how you found it. I gave up searching.


If im honest, i'm struggling to get a foothold into this game due to time constraints or just because you guys are so good/quick onto everything Smile
Everytime i manage to check back, things have always progressed considerably. Because of this, i kind of saw the painting (as well as that stupid pile of rocks from the codex thats still unidentified) as an opportunity to try and help. I'm in England, not too far from Cardiff i guess and i could have gone there to clarify its existence should i have needed to.
In the end i struck lucky searching for variations on the details of the painting. e.g. 'Heracles at the feet of Omphale'. Very Happy

On a separate note, when i spoke to 'Geoff' at Cardiff city hall, my opening gambit was about how strange a question it was likely to be. His reply was "its not that strange...in fact i've just had an email regarding the same painting"....could this be you Lhall?? Wink

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:29 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
snurge
Boot

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 30

Markus wrote in his diary from 13th February.
"Ich bin nach unten gelaufen um Jack zu finden, aber er war nirgends zu finden. Jack hatte offensichtlich genug Geld: Das Haus hatte viele teuere Sachen. Ein riesiger Fernseher war auf einer Wand, und auf einer anderen, ein Gemälde das sehr alt und sehr teuer aussah. In der Küche sah ich einen Zettel von Jack. Er war in der Arbeit, würde aber um 6 zurück sein."

translated (by Aerith)
"I ran downstairs to find Jack but couldn't find him. Obviously Jack had enough money: In the house were many expensive things. A gigantic television was on a wall and on another wall there was a painting which looked very old and expensive. In the kitchen, I saw a note Jack had left me. He was at work and would be back around 6pm."

Is it possible that this 'old and expensive' painting was the Hercules/Omphale painting?

Jack introduced Markus to Flickr and Markus bought a Digicam with the money he stole from Jack.

I know that we should be careful in terms of finger pointing but i still am a little wary of Markus due to what we currently beleive to be misinformation about this painting.
Also, stealing from a stranger who's gone out of their way to help you when in need doesn't seem like the best behaviour in the multiverse.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:13 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jasper
Unfettered


Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Texas

Then again, it might be fairly creepy if Jack had that painting with the omphalos related name and just happened to be in the right place at the right time, with the right disposition to pick up an amnesiac labyrinth runner from another world. I mistrust Markus for stealing and hiding, and it takes a couple of long stretches to put the painting into Jack's house, but if it is there, I mistrust Jack too.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:24 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
snurge
Boot

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 30

jasper wrote:
Then again, it might be fairly creepy if Jack had that painting with the omphalos related name and just happened to be in the right place at the right time, with the right disposition to pick up an amnesiac labyrinth runner from another world. I mistrust Markus for stealing and hiding, and it takes a couple of long stretches to put the painting into Jack's house, but if it is there, I mistrust Jack too.


This was pretty much my thoughts too. I just wanted to mention it as i'd only just read through Markus's diary and thought it a little strange that he would even mention it.

Maybe Jack is part of TheO who tried to intercept our Agon's before us Wink

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:28 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Elizabeth123
Decorated


Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 285

Has anybody contacted Ariadne (or Markus) about this? It might be interesting to see what kind of excuses he might come up with!

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:47 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
danteIL
Unfictologist


Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 1990

Thinking about second stories, I suppose the fact that the Melbourne artifact showed up in a fire station could relate to the fact that it described visions of catastrophes and fires in other worlds..


*streeetch*

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:11 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 3 [35 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Find the Lost Ring
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group