Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 17, 2024 7:22 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): Puzzles
[SPEC] Answering the GPS question
View previous topicView next topic
Page 4 of 6 [83 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
babbler
Boot

Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 48

It's suggestive, but yeah, not compelling enough to constitute a solution. (But it does match up very well....)

We can assume that when we find a solution, we'll know it, even if we don't know how we'll know (a nice epistemological puzzle, that). So far, this is too open to interpretation for me to accept in and of itself, but it's surely worth keeping in mind as a possible key.

And I'm still bothered by Texas' absence....
_________________
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
-Virgil


PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:50 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Grout
Veteran

Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 105

ok cheese, I'm going to take your word for it. There are some points that point to deserted locations where there could be no computer.

Therefore... My theory AND the internet backbone theory are both ruled out.

Now we can move on. Scientific method.

I could be wrong, but it seems to me that most, if not all, of these points are on STREETS. This would lead me to believe that these GPS coordinates were originally pulled from ADDRESSES. It's what originally led me to my IP theory... But if the PMs made this list from addresses, then I'd think what is at these locations should probably be our main focus at this point. Too bad they seem to have nothing in common. Grouping?

PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sherpa
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 338
Location: cam.ac.uk

Righto. In the 'scientific method' camp, here's an Excel sheet (sorry, I can't wait to get home and bang some of this stuff through Perl scripts) which has the co-ords, distances, pairings and addresses in it. No conclusions as yet - it's meant to be a tool to help people experiment, rather than have to dig through 30 pages and several websites to get the data.

Enjoy.
_________________
stercus, stercus, moriturus sum!
~ a girl of many names ~


PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:59 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
ilovecheese
Boot

Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Posts: 39

Grout wrote:
ok cheese, I'm going to take your word for it. There are some points that point to deserted locations where there could be no computer.

Therefore... My theory AND the internet backbone theory are both ruled out.

Now we can move on. Scientific method.

I could be wrong, but it seems to me that most, if not all, of these points are on STREETS. This would lead me to believe that these GPS coordinates were originally pulled from ADDRESSES. It's what originally led me to my IP theory... But if the PMs made this list from addresses, then I'd think what is at these locations should probably be our main focus at this point. Too bad they seem to have nothing in common. Grouping?


just for future reference, here is the list of location from the wiki

http://bees.netninja.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:GPS_Locations

PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 1:08 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jbd
Decorated

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 295

sherpa wrote:
Yes, there do appear to be some things in common. Yes, it could be a variant on the links puzzle - group and assemble. This has been repeated many times though. Congratulations on volunteering to assemble a coherent list of groupings and what things are. See you in six months' time Wink


Wasn't one of the complaints in the original game that the puzzles didn't take long to solve? This might have been their solution.

Anyhow, we still need to work on both micro-level and macro-level theories. I actually recommend we split the discussion into two threads (I just made one), so the people working don't bump into each other so much and argue over what's really just still spec.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 1:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Samari
Veteran


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 72
Location: Notre Dame, IN

if we want to use scientific method i suggest we start using it from the beginging rather than take a look at a few points, start making half-cocked theories then bickering over whether they make sense.

lets think about what we know so far

*the points tend to cluster around major population centers, there is probaly a reason for this.

*they are also given to us in pairs of points, which doesn't seem like it was accidental.

*they are also located on the same page that talks about axons, how do they relate to axons?

*from the points that have been examined so far, there is no obvious similarities among all the points, although there are some groups of locations with similar landmarks.

*none of the points are outside the contiguous US. what makes the US so special? [meta] if something at the physical locations is important, it makes the game less enjoyable for foriegn players (and texan players for that matter) or it is a puzzle designed to require massive teamwork.

*which begs the question, texas has major population centers but no points, why?

*this has something to do with an AI trapped on a clunky computer in California

that's all the points i can come up with for now but i'm sure there are more important pieces. any good theory will at least attepmt to address these points and address them simply and elegantly. I don't have any answers really but sometimes it helps to break down the question into smaller bits.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:23 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Speaker
Veteran

Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 108
Location: Mississippi

http://bees.netninja.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:GPS_Locations#Row-017_Col-001

Check that out... it might be a solid lead. Discussing in the Obvious Coordinates Conclusion thread

http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5552
_________________
Speaker
LCP Profile


PostPosted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:41 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
jbd
Decorated

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 295

If there's a commonality between locations, I'm guessing it's a *grouped* commonality. That is, these 10 places are near a Denny's, these 10 are near a Borders, these 10 are in the woods, but of course if you pick a random small set they'll all probably be different.

I know we've been focused on pairs, but it's entirely possible the double-column thing is just formatting and the left-right connection is meaningless.

To extrapolate from the capabilities of the AI, imagine it looking up various business and historical sites and location names and the using reverse GPS lookup to extrapolate the GPS numbers. This would result in a bit of innacuracy and a lot of things showing up at intersections (because from looking on the Internet, you don't know the closest Borders if five blocks down to the north, just that it's at 1st and 22nd or whatever).

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 3:44 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
floorneyne
Veteran


Joined: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 89

jbd wrote:
If there's a commonality between locations, I'm guessing it's a *grouped* commonality. That is, these 10 places are near a Denny's, these 10 are near a Borders, these 10 are in the woods, but of course if you pick a random small set they'll all probably be different.

I know we've been focused on pairs, but it's entirely possible the double-column thing is just formatting and the left-right connection is meaningless.

To extrapolate from the capabilities of the AI, imagine it looking up various business and historical sites and location names and the using reverse GPS lookup to extrapolate the GPS numbers. This would result in a bit of innacuracy and a lot of things showing up at intersections (because from looking on the Internet, you don't know the closest Borders if five blocks down to the north, just that it's at 1st and 22nd or whatever).


I think this is a good way of looking at it. The questiong is: what does the Operator require to become "wide awake and physical"? That's what we're working up to here, right?
_________________
"If he's so smart, then how come he's dead?" --HJS

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 4:24 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
firefox
Unfettered

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 333

ok lets see

wide awake-

rebuilding of all memory, more computer space/ power

does she need to tap into like a big electrical source? are the points on the map connected in a way to electrical outlets: power stations, or transformer boxes or something.

any connection to the earth's fault lines? earth energy (wild spec)

physical-

she can move around, network to network, or create a physical body presence (is building a voice step one? body next? )

also digital_nihil mentioned looking to the stars, can they be sky co-ordinates?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 6:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 4310
Location: Des Moines, IA

firefox wrote:
also digital_nihil mentioned looking to the stars, can they be sky co-ordinates?

As is, I don't think so. Star coordinates are usually given in ascension and declination (hh:mm:ss right ascension and dd:mm:ss declination). Ascension is measured in hours, so this number will be less than 24, and declination goes from -90 degrees to +90.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 8:51 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Astald
Unfettered

Joined: 01 Aug 2004
Posts: 747
Location: Just outside of Pittsburgh (Go Steelers!)

I think the two columns must be somewhat related. Look at row 19, column one and two are not only in the same state, the same city, but even ON THE SAME ROAD! There has got to be something there on that road in Rootstown, OH. And other than that, those two places are next to nothing, just on a big road. Although I personally haven't checked that site, just the impression I got from mapquest.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 6:39 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
jbd
Decorated

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 295

Astald wrote:
I think the two columns must be somewhat related. Look at row 19, column one and two are not only in the same state, the same city, but even ON THE SAME ROAD! There has got to be something there on that road in Rootstown, OH. And other than that, those two places are next to nothing, just on a big road. Although I personally haven't checked that site, just the impression I got from mapquest.


Meta-wise, this is more suggestive to me that people found the sites by hand, and they were entered into the table in the order they were sent back. Note the only regional grouping isn't left-right, there are some sets that appear if you keep reading left to right, top to bottom.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 7:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Grout
Veteran

Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 105

not all of them though jbd - for example 4 of the chicago sites are grouped together on the list but one is way out for some reason

...or for no reason

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 7:57 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jbd
Decorated

Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 295

I've noted the 'one separate from the rest thing' too. That suggests whoever it was took a break and came back later after other entries already came in.

For more support that it isn't just left-right relations, note how Row 2 Column 2 (between Jefferson Memorial and East Potomoc Park) and Row 3 Column 1 (near the Smithsonian Institution Building, Castle Visitor Information Center, Arts and Industries Building, and The Mall) are awful close to each other.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 8:14 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 4 of 6 [83 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): Puzzles
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group