Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 12, 2024 12:08 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Find the Lost Ring
[ARTIFACT] Singapore
View previous topicView next topic
Page 3 of 3 [45 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3
Author Message
Weezel
Unfettered


Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Location: National Park, NJ

Re: sangigo = bloodshed?

Retzglaran wrote:
Junesun wrote:
For sangigo, this would mean:
sang- -> blood, to bleed
-ig- -> to make, cause to be ==> together: to make bleed, to cause something to be blood
-o -> noun ==> the making bleed, the act of causing something to be blood
... It just sounds weird to me Wink


The act of causing something to bleed? Shedding blood? What if "la unua kiu atestis la sangigon" means, "the first who witnessed the bloodshed", meaning persecution of the agonothetai and the athletes after the ban on labyrinth-running?


No an Esperanto speaker, but listening to you guys determine the proper meaning here, I think that bloodshed definitely fits as a possible word, considering we know the consequences of a failed synchronization... bloodshed indeed.

There is some discussion on the official forums regarding the translation as well. I didn't crossreference the names here against the names there, but I think you guys are involved there too correct? I know there was a disagreement on a translation and little wiki-edit reversion thing going on.

Gotta be tough translating this stuff, so I don't envy the varied interpretations.
_________________
Wiki: FTLR
Blog: If Chaos Was Organized


PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:39 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
sapagoo
Charter Member


Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 1213
Location: Atlanta, GA

Keep in mind this is chapter 18. We skipped ahead a few chapters.
If we are lucky, one of the chapters we haven't seen yet can enlighten us.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
AUZ505
Unfictologist


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1599
Location: Germany

Weezel wrote:
Troag Lee wrote:
Congratulations!

Any 'second clue' at the location?


I think the consensus so far has been that the choice of location is important as the second clue.

This chapter was about the Law, and the location (while currently an Art House), is the Old Parliament. Definitely a location regarding law.


Have we agreed on that?

I still do not see this conection. We have two more or less confirmed "second stories". The painting at Cardiff and the "Galilee project" at San Francisco.
Both were not the location itself, but something AT the location.

With your argumentation, one could easily say: chapter one is about registering peoples. That's why it is in a city hall. But then we would not have found Hercules and Omphale.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
momonga
Boot


Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 66
Location: San Francisco

Hmm, I don't want to sound... how should I put it? Is there a word for our-world/reality-centric? :O It seems to me that our world is the so-called 'original world.' We've been speculating about what the lost ring could be and I know some people threw around the idea that maybe the lost ring is one of the six forms, Gaea, which we're in. If we really are the 'true unique omphaloi' that the athletes are supposed to protect, then it makes it all the more ominous that Gaea is practically an external/outer world threatening to collapse into Neopangaea. I also find it interesting that the chapter uses the word 'umbilical'... any connection to the navel? Razz Where is the navel? Hum!

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:45 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
mr.judkins
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 393
Location: Wellington, NZ

On the topic of Oaths - while investigating the 1920 Olympic Games in Antwerp a couple weeks ago, I discovered something that I don't think has been mentioned yet.

Those 1920 Games were not only the first to use the Olympic Flag as we know it (with the five rings), but it was also the first to include the Olympic Oath
.

Spot the similarities. Smile

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:01 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
AUZ505
Unfictologist


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1599
Location: Germany

mr.judkins wrote:
On the topic of Oaths - while investigating the 1920 Olympic Games in Antwerp a couple weeks ago, I discovered something that I don't think has been mentioned yet.

Those 1920 Games were not only the first to use the Olympic Flag as we know it (with the five rings), but it was also the first to include the Olympic Oath.

Spot the similarities. Smile


Nice find!

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jasper
Unfettered


Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Texas

momonga wrote:
Hmm, I don't want to sound... how should I put it? Is there a word for our-world/reality-centric? :O It seems to me that our world is the so-called 'original world.' We've been speculating about what the lost ring could be and I know some people threw around the idea that maybe the lost ring is one of the six forms, Gaea, which we're in. If we really are the 'true unique omphaloi' that the athletes are supposed to protect, then it makes it all the more ominous that Gaea is practically an external/outer world threatening to collapse into Neopangaea. I also find it interesting that the chapter uses the word 'umbilical'... any connection to the navel? Razz Where is the navel? Hum!

I think it does say navel Smile though our experts haven't said so.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:19 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Chid12
Boot


Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 60

I think 'umbiliko' does translate best to 'navel' in this situation. It does seem obvious to translate it as 'umbilical' but 'umbilical' is an adjective, and so it would end in the letter 'a' in Esperanto. Words that end in 'o' are nouns, hence 'navel' as the best translation.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:26 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Retzglaran
Boot


Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 10

Chid12 wrote:
I think 'umbiliko' does translate best to 'navel' in this situation. It does seem obvious to translate it as 'umbilical' but 'umbilical' is an adjective, and so it would end in the letter 'a' in Esperanto. Words that end in 'o' are nouns, hence 'navel' as the best translation.


I'll go with that. (good grief, this translation stuff is way harder than I thought! I didn't think there would be this much revision!)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:56 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jasper
Unfettered


Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Texas

Is that a drawing of our solar system? I was thinking it was until I started counting planets.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:07 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Elizabeth123
Decorated


Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 285

Looking at the relative sizes, it looks like there' an extra planet either between the Earth and Mars (maybe the moon?), or between Mars and Jupiter (one of Jupiter's moons?), and then one of the dwarf planets is included after Pluto. (Although why would it show one and not the other?)

I also wonder what the red lines between some of the planets are supposed to signify--And whether the two large globes above the planets are supposed to be planets as well.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:01 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
joeyhess
Boot


Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 60

Elizabeth123 wrote:
Looking at the relative sizes, it looks like there' an extra planet either between the Earth and Mars (maybe the moon?), or between Mars and Jupiter (one of Jupiter's moons?), and then one of the dwarf planets is included after Pluto. (Although why would it show one and not the other?)

I also wonder what the red lines between some of the planets are supposed to signify--And whether the two large globes above the planets are supposed to be planets as well.


The "extra" planet is about the right size to be Ganymede, or maybe it's depicting another universe where the astroid belt formed a planet..

If the extra is the Moon, then Mars is oddly drawn smaller than the moon. OTOH, the planets are not drawn with perfect relative sizes either.

My guess is the small dot after pluto is intended to be Charon.
Only problem with this theory is that Charon was discovered in 1978 (on this world..).

Likewise, the depiction of the ring around Uranus is odd, since, according to wikipedia, only one person had claimed such a ring existed before it was proven to exist in 1977.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Retzglaran
Boot


Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 10

a planet between Mars and Jupiter? Sounds like Phaeton (also called "Planet V") to me:

Phaeton

Planet V

...which is entirely possible in an alternate reality...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:16 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Guest
Guest


Phaeton who tried to drive Zues's solar chariot with disasterous results, eh? Is that chariot depicted on Eli hunt's book cover?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:30 pm
 Back to top 
unagi
Unfettered


Joined: 31 Mar 2008
Posts: 464
Location: Japan

Yesterday I heard Noriko was planning to take the Oath in Ch. 18, I corrected my Japanese translation.

I also changed the Esperanto transcription in Wiki as follows:
1. la scio la muntaj fontas -> la scio de la multaj fontas
(This is a simple transcription mistake)
2. la unua kiu atestis la sangigon -> la unua kiu atestis la sangigon (ŝanĝiĝon?).
(I thought no conclusion were made so I showed both possibilities)

These changes were incorporated into Ariadne/Alex blog, but James seems to have taken a former version of the Oath.
I haven't changed the English version.

In addition, comparing the Oath with the Olympic one, I think the change
3. per la gloro de nia sporto, kaj per la honoro de niaj teamoj -> por la gloro de nia sporto, kaj por la honoro de niaj teamoj
would be appropriate. (But I didn't change the Esperanto/English versions.)

EDIT: I forgot to mention
4. όμφαλοί -> όμφαλος
at two sites.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 3 [45 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Find the Lost Ring
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group