unforum

dconrad · Kilroy Joined: 16 Aug 2004 Posts: 1

I took the distances, in pairs, and converted them to letters.

The largest value is around 2700 and the smallest is 0 (rounded to nearest 100).

The results are as follows:
EIHBCHEGAJBIDDQZRAAECBFAAAUdCB
M]gZJBA[FFOKDcRCUA]aLaFVKCj_ME]^ISCILFgPPIBjfKd]HLBRJGICC^QBAEECAAFGAGEGigAACA]B

in km (0 km = a). Too many outliers there.

CEEABECDAFAECCIOJAACBADAAALTBBH
PUOFBAODDIFCTJBLAPRGRDMGBWQHCPQ
EKBEGCVIIEBWUFTPEGAJFDEBBQJBACCBA
ADDADCDVUAABAPB

in nm.

CFEBBEDEAGAFCCKQKAADBADAAAMWB
BIRXQGBAQDDJGCVKBMARUHUDNGBZS
ICSSFLCFHDYKKFB[XGWRFHALGDFBBSK
BADCBAADEAECEZXAABASB

in statute miles. The later two both fit a frequency count fairly well, but don't seem to be an easy rotation code or anything. I am somewhat concerned about the triple that appears, but it could be a word break.

One other thing i noticed, if you look at the site itself, the pairs are grouped. The borders of the table have different markings (At least on ie and moz). The first group is ~26 (no markings) and the next several are word lengths.

Edit: Sorry the first group is only ~16. The markings are very faint in the first and last groups.

**Posted:** Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:44 pm

thebruce

Has anyone tried gathering a listing of the elevation of each of the points and including those numbers in a graphing? essentially, we'd end up reducing the coordinate table to two columns, pairs of elevation numbers... or 2 columns of lat/long/elev coordinate sets...

**Posted:** Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:10 pm

xnbomb

Elevations

**Posted:** Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:35 pm

_________________
My location is a little tricky, but sooner or later, you'll get the knack.

{J302B S8JDC, 8996N M8L4W, 92D40 Q1JX5, 4PPRN R2B97, 8DC7C NZJNV, 8CH7V Q891H}

John Incognito · Boot Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 27

**Posted:** Wed Aug 18, 2004 9:43 pm

_________________
ARG Good! Fire Bad!