Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:25 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
[Question] Who is the boy AI character?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 3 of 3 [37 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3
Author Message
gheritt
Boot


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 58

A serious answer from me this time: I think the "body" she's talking about may be metaphorical. (As so many things in this game are.) Right now she's stuck on a server and can't, I think, even venture onto the web on her own. I think she wants things like the webcam she caught Dana on (eyes), ways onto the global network (fingers/feet/whatever), that sort of thing. If AIs think of their ships as their bodies, then she's been put in a new body. She's trying to figure out what it can do.
_________________
Gheritt White had been floating six feet off the floor for three weeks.........

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Knight Hawk
Boot

Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 22
Location: Earth

Well, some AI's do have bodies.

At the beginning of the Cortanna letters she speaks in a very condescending tone about the MC. Calling him a weapon and other stuff. This may almost be wild spec but Melissa could be referring to a Spartan as being her body. The boy's face was her own could mean that the boys face was the Spartan whose body she was inhabiting at the time of the crash. The sand reference could be to the more intricate neural net of silicone and other things a Spartans brain and body parts are made up of.

Manticore though= Manti-Core= MC perhaps?
_________________
Yesterday is just a dream I don't remember...
Tommorow..still hope I've yet to indulge..


PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:15 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Knofc
Guest


Just wondering about the whole casket/capsule thang.

In Melissa's memories about bring the capsule in-board she gives it a scan and makes a superfluous statement about experiencing "a stutter of lag once in a while". Right after this she notices that something didn't feel right and alludes to something being on her system that shouldn't be there.

Now, I know that they go on to discuss that it could be a piggy-back on a covenant signal. But couldn't it have come from the object during the scan? I'm think flea here. A reasonably simple program which then goes out to dig for relevant info (or something).

This memory sequence also has Sorensen proposes the idea to bring in a "dolly-bot" to take the capsule to the hold. Also that the capsule will have to be warmed up (taken out of deep-space freeze I guess). What if this warming of the capsule allows SP to activate, but finds herself trapped in both the dolly bot, and in the hold?

In the Killer texts SP also alludes to the fact that she's used to hiding away and meddling (Killer 13: I am fine, have the necessary tools to hide hard in the darkness, to meddle in the affairs of dragons and run like hell This entity generally gives good results.). Perhaps her whole reason for being is to act as an invasive data gathering program?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:30 pm
 Back to top 
princeofthesword
Boot

Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 67

slightly off topic

Great thoughts guys. This is slightly off the main topic, as I'm moving off the spec about the boy for now, but I'll respond to everybody anyway.Yeah, I'm guessing Melissa's meaning a metaphorical body too, Gheritt. Or rather I should say electronic/interface type stuff. I kept thinking "Field epedient body" meant something more tangible, dang her deceptive speech. But I see what you mean, and I must've misunderstood her, sigh.

Good specking there Knight Hawk. Cortana refers to the Autumn as her body, rather than the Chief, though. While it'd be cool if she meant a Spartan, I'm doubting there's anyone tangible involved from the Haloverse. I'm not bashing your spec (NEVER a spec basher, all spec is useful in its place) just reminding you not to get too ingrained into the Halo-mold, though this is definitely related.

I read your stuff at the "Haloverse, wild or otherwise spec" page, good stuff there. In fact, I'm quite agreeable with that concept, I'm leaning towards the AIs being the only ones here in our time for some reason we don't yet understand. Possible that it has something to do with their very nature: they're information, organized in a particular way, computers. Their info could have been "slipstream mailed" through time somehow. Likely linked to the artifact, though if the Forerunner artifact itself was linked to the reason they're all on Our Earth now, not sure...thickening plot.

Knofc, I like the post because it's something we've not touched on too much, the thought that the artifact might be the source of the interference Melissa mentions. We just assume that the troubles with the Op started because of the Covenant transmission, and that it brought the Flea. Reason is that in Phase 3 text Melissa herself suggests that it's the most likely possibility, but maybe we jumped to conclusions. (I would like to point out, though, that if she had the artifact by then, why wouldn't she have considered that as a possible source of the trouble? Check out http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5388&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=60 for some discussion about the chain of events).

Your scenario is good, and it's (in my mind) entirely possible that the Sleeping Princess AI or at least the artifact could've caused the entire mess, and the Flea just was along for the ride waiting for the right moment. As fleas tend to do.

Slightly spec, your thought reminds me that this is indeed Bungie we're dealing with, and by the end SP might turn out to be someone we couldn't trust. But I agree with you, she's good at gathering info (look at all she's supposedly gathered for us) and she's good at hiding. Hide and Seek? Farewell, keep up the spec.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:16 am
 View user's profile Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Kagehi Kossori
Veteran


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 75
Location: Lake Havasu AZ

Actually, I don't agree with the "only the AIs are here" idea at all. These things are complicated. Far more complicated and requiring huge capacities over what our current machines can expect to store. Maybe one of those G4TechTV/Screensavers projects that chain 5 drives together, for like 1,800GB, but even then it is only data unless there is an OS to run it. What do you think the likelyhook of them still using x86 based instruction sets in the future is? Maybe, but incredibly unlikely, these are military AIs, even if you assumed that the trend to include backward compatibility stretched that far into the future (really unlikely), there would be no reason to provide it in military ONI AI systems, where the architecture would need to be fundimentally different.

Put simply, no AI from the future Halo time could run on our current systems without a complete rewrite of the OS on a machine to support it. A smart enough program 'might' be able to code such an OS and thus allow an AI to exist on current hardware, but you can't just beam the stuff through time and have it arrive in any condition to run on such machines. Ok, maybe some really cheesy Sci-Fi movies would pull that sort of thing, but gamers (I would hope) tend to be smarter than that. Strange artifacts that warp space and time, maybe, but when it comes to future AIs teleporting into current systems... That is the sort of ultra-silly BS you got in old movies, where something that we can't even run now magically infects an bloody 8088 8-bit processor architecture and by its mere presence makes it function a thousand times faster. Wrong! The idea imho didn't fly in some of those lame shows and it is even less probable in the current context. I would really hope the PMs are not so lame as to make it happen that way.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:06 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Astald
Unfettered

Joined: 01 Aug 2004
Posts: 747
Location: Just outside of Pittsburgh (Go Steelers!)

The SPDR may have been able to do such a rewrite. Just my little bit of spec.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 3:09 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Kagehi Kossori
Veteran


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 75
Location: Lake Havasu AZ

Yes the SPDR could have, but my point is 'not in mid tranmission'. Even SPDR needs some physical hardware to run on when starting out, it wouldn't just drop out of the sky as data and land on the network. At least not without using some really cheesy Sci-Fi that defies not merely time, but basic logic and common sense. This is the sort of thing that you could get by with only in a fantasy containing magic, or twenty years ago when people really didn't comrehend anything about computers. If you are making a Freddy movie, then you expect people to suspend reason a bit or at least hope so, but most true sci-fi wants to avoid the pitfall of people picking it apart after the fact and exposing all the holes. The idea that somehow, in transit, SPDR or anything else could zap itself and the AIs onto our architecture is a really major hole imho.

Oh, and as to Forerunner device = magic, which someone might bring up.. The point is that such a device may 'look' like magic to a primitive, but it still can't defy logic. Its effects must make some rational sense, even if the means to achieve them are out of reach. That is why it is called 'science' fiction, not fantasy.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:23 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 3 [37 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group