Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:58 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Old News & Rumors
Rabbit Hole Via Mail!
View previous topicView next topic
Page 7 of 10 [144 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
Shadow E. Coyote
Guest


 This is not a game? Then why all the rules?
Forum Dogma, Censorship, and The Impediment of Creativity!

Hi, let me just say that I mean no disrespect, I don't wish to offend, or break any rules. I just want to understand the hows and whys of this place, and hear peoples opinions on what seems to be smelling more and more like some kind of ARG dogma... Again no offense, just trying to understand it all.

ndemeter Posted: Yesterday, at 10:31 pm

"Allow me to try to explain. I don't come to uF to *play* ARG's. I don't come here to talk to *characters* or get *clues* from them. For me these forums are my escape from Alternate Reality (Gaming)."

- Why not? Why are the rules like this? Forgive my not understanding of the intent and nature of these rules, but I'm not quite sure what the issue is? Why is posting in character wrong? The internet is technically (in a sense) one giant ARG, no one is really as they seem - heck, even avatars are an 'alternate reality' of the self. Unless you have specifically met the person you are chatting with in real life, you really don't know who you are talking to... So where's the problem?

"They are here to inform me of the latest and greatest projects, find out if someone has finally broken a code I have been banging my head against the wall with, collaborate on everything with everyone, and talk to friends."

- Sure, but can't you still do all of that even if someone is commenting as an in game character? No? Your friends are still 'real' and 'secure', and wouldn't a character coming in here to post just make the whole process more fun, and even help the process with more clues and information? (Especially if players get stuck.)

"That is my reality. Those are my boundaries."

- Again, no disrespect, but why? Internet 'reality' is tenuous at best, and your boundaries are really not being trodden on with Star's little postings here... Just like with obscene television shows or offensive music - if you don't like it, don't read it, don't post about it, just turn it off and walk away. You're an American! You above anyone else should be waving your flag like a crazy person in favour of free speech - no matter what form it takes... Am I wrong? If someone wants to post in character, wouldn't being against that also be the same as being against free speech? Seems to me that you either have total freedom to say what you like, or not at all.

"And this game intruded on my boundaries, it attempted to play itself in my sandbox forcefully."

- I'm sorry you feel that way, and really, if there is a way to block Star's future posts you really should because Star will probably only get more offensive in the future as she gets louder and louder, and more and more active... Star does like gaming in the very grey edges of reality and comfort, yes that is true, but in reality, Star did not force you or anyone else for that matter, to play in HER sandbox, you chose to read, play, and post - no gun was put to your head. Again not to sound rude, but If you don't like it, why bother with her then?

"So now what? When I talk to Star here from now on will I be talking to a real life game developer in Canada or to some character from a game?"

- With Star, yes, it's absolutely 100% possible that when meeting her in "real life", that you could be being offered a rabbit hole, and that at any moment, reality will shift, things will get 'weird' and you will be offered the CHOICE to participate in a game. It's up to you which pill you wish to take, and if you want to take the 'red' pill, well the choice is yours, and really, it'll be your loss. (Again no offense, it's just a different way to look at ARGing)

"If I meet up with you at ARGFest am I going to be talking to a colleague or will I have well-rehearsed script spoken back at me?"

- First off, yes you will be talking to a colleague, and no, probably not a "script"... Star hates scripts as they tend to 'railroad' characters (which is anathema to her). No scripts, though she may have a game plan, but the framework is flexible, constantly moving, and really very much something a colleague like you should want to discuss with a colleague like her - whether she is 'in game' or not.

"You see the problem here?"

- No not really. Seriously, I don't get the issue. Games are fun, what Star does is fun, and if it's not fun to you, then don't play - if it's some kind of particular dogmatic forum rule that has your dander up and rules are that important to you, and if the breaking of that rule offended you that much and you can't simply look away from her posts, or even report it so she can have it explained to her - and who knows? Perhaps she can get some rules changed around here by opening up the minds of the creators of this forum.

"And that's why I really don't care what W.O.W. has to say. I wanted to find W.O.W. with my group, not have him post here. I wanted to discover your character's blog in a trailhead or a clue, not have the entries posted from your character as an "update" to the story, and once again, here.
That was the problem with AWARE and that's the problem with this. I hope this makes sense."

Again, no not really, it doesn't make sense to me at all... Now, I don't know much about forums, or twittering, or even this internets thing I am pecking away at... But I do know games.

I'm an old school gamer, DMing since I was 10, and in terms of ARGing, I was playing Steve Jacksons "Killer" in the streets if downtown Toronto when the term "Alternate Reality" basically consisted of text adventures like Monty Python's Holy Grail as I typing out the answer to "Gezza light mate?" on a Commodore 64. Now in all these years of gaming, I've learned that the one thing that can always trip up a game more than anything else, is the RULES. To many, to complicated, or too strict; sticking to rules for the sake of rules does nothing to advance gaming and really, only serves to advance the dogma of ego thereby stifling creativity; and creativity is the lifeblood of gaming - especially in ARGing.

Free your minds people - gaming should push you forward and make you more than you started out as; and if this is too much to ask, then perhaps a "choose your own adventure" book is a better fit... Wink


Dwight: What weapon?
Andy: My bare hands.
Dwight: That is stupid. I will use a sword and I will cut off your bare hands.
Andy: There is no spoon, therefore there is no sword.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:05 am
 Back to top 
SpaceBass
The BADministrator


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 2701
Location: pellucidar

Re: This is not a game? Then why all the rules?
Forum Dogma, Censorship, and The Impediment of Creativity!

Shadow E. Coyote wrote:
Dwight: What weapon?
Andy: My bare hands.
Dwight: That is stupid. I will use a sword and I will cut off your bare hands.
Andy: There is no spoon, therefore there is no sword.


[While approaching the annoying cigar smokers.]

Henry Desalvo: Excuse me would you mind putting out your cigars?

Bruce: Come again.

Henry Desalvo: I said would you mind putting out your cigars, please?

Bruce: Actually I would mind.

Henry Desalvo: Well you see the reason I asked is because I got a thick New York strip over there and it tastes like I'm eating a cigar.

Bruce: Well first of all Ace: You're eating a steak in a seafood restaurant. And secondly there is no law that says we can't smoke.

Henry Desalvo: Well first of all: My name is not Ace and second of all: I am not asking you as a courtesy, it's just good manners. Now there is no law that says I can't come over here and fart on your entree, but I don't. Why? Because it isn't good manners. Now I will ask you again in the nicest way to please put out your cigars.

[Bruce blows smoke in Henry's face and laughs with his friends. Henry snaps Bruce's fingers and puts out his cigar and everyone does the same.]

Henry Desalvo: Thank you.

Bruce: I hope you realize you just committed assault.

Henry Desalvo: I know, I know. I remember time was you actually had to hit somebody.
_________________
Alternate Reality Gaming
http://www.unfiction.com/


PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:44 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
krystyn
I Never Tire of My Own Voice


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 3651
Location: Is not Chicago

colonopenparenthesis

Star Spider wrote:
I think if you have a problem with the idea of not knowing if someone is a 'real' person or an ARG character, you might want to reconsider your hobby.

Trust
Pronunciation:
\ˈtrəst\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English, probably of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse traust trust; akin to Old English trēowe faithful — more at true
Date:
13th century

1 a: assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something b: one in which confidence is placed2 a: dependence on something future or contingent : hope b: reliance on future payment for property (as merchandise) delivered : credit <bought>3 a: a property interest held by one person for the benefit of another b: a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement ; especially : one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition4archaic : trustworthiness5 a (1): a charge or duty imposed in faith or confidence or as a condition of some relationship (2): something committed or entrusted to one to be used or cared for in the interest of another b: responsible charge or office c: care , custody <the>
— in trust
: in the care or possession of a trustee
_________________
Alternate Currency
Stories and dreams, crossing my palm like silver.

xbl gamertag: krystyn


PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:55 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Cryptfiend
Boot


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 40
Location: tampa

addlepated wrote:
You're claiming that there's no safe place for the posters on Unfiction? For the attendees of ARGFest? Just because there are people here posting (or lurking, hi!), they should automatically be subjected to a blurring of their boundaries without their consent, even in a place previously agreed upon as safe, and if they don't like it, they should get another hobby? That's pretty aggressive.


let me preface my response with saying that ive been a lurker on these boards much, much longer than my account has been active...i understand what you are trying to say addlepated. i have, however, been here long enough to form my own opinion about things, and that is what you will read. my own opinion.

with that caveat. Yeah. no place is safe. That's the whole idea. Going to an ArgFest and meeting Star in person...she could be a character in a game. The general idea of this gaming platform IS the blurring of boundries. The attempted seemless transition between the real world and the universe that the creator of the game creates for our mutual enjoyment.

That being said, i also agree with the rules of the unfiction site being safe from the puppetmaster's posting. Not because i think that the forum needs to be safe in and of itself. I think unfiction should be safe because of organizational concerns. Can you imagine if all of the pm's were posting in their threads, starting new threads, mucking around in character in other peoples threads that have nothing to do with their game, yet the action is still within the character of the person the PM has created?

no, that would simply cause confusion and undermine the integrity of the genre.

I think star should have been allowed to post in this thread in the manner in which she did. By playing in the games, you are a character in the game. the character is you, yourself. to limit her ability to post as a character would hinder the development of that particular game and retard the genre's ability to 'blur' as it were.

Edited to fix quote tags - gup

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:37 am
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
konamouse
Official uF Dietitian


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 8010
Location: My own alternate reality

Bottom line - this sandbox has some rules - aka "Terms of Service".

It's conveniently posted at the top of the page.

This is a board for DISCUSSING the ARGs, not playing them out with characters in here. This place is not suppose to exist in the reality of the characters. Characters are not suppose to know uF exists (they think they are real, in here we talk about them being fictional characters). In here we help eachother solve puzzles, share information and discuss the meta of the alternate universe in which the characters exist.

That's the rules as put forth when this place was first created. It's been questioned ad naseum and always been upheld.

Like visiting someone else's playground, it's polite to play by their rules, not yours. You would want the same respect if they visited your home.

If you want to have posted dialogue with players and characters, please create a separate place on the internet for these types of interactions.
_________________
'squeek'
r u a Sammeeeee? I am Forever!


PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
teh_lisa
Entrenched


Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 950
Location: my chair

konamouse wrote:
Bottom line - this sandbox has some rules - aka "Terms of Service".

It's conveniently posted at the top of the page.

This is a board for DISCUSSING the ARGs, not playing them out with characters in here. This place is not suppose to exist in the reality of the characters. Characters are not suppose to know uF exists (they think they are real, in here we talk about them being fictional characters). In here we help eachother solve puzzles, share information and discuss the meta of the alternate universe in which the characters exist.

That's the rules as put forth when this place was first created. It's been questioned ad naseum and always been upheld.

Like visiting someone else's playground, it's polite to play by their rules, not yours. You would want the same respect if they visited your home.

If you want to have posted dialogue with players and characters, please create a separate place on the internet for these types of interactions.


And there we have the bottom line. Are we locked over here yet? Smile
_________________
drop it like it's hot

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

I picture Michael Scott planning the surprise booze cruise...

Stanley: Michael...
Michael: Stanley...bo banley.
Stanley: I need to know-
Michael: Banana fana fo fanley.
Stanley: What we're doing.
Michael: Me mi mo manley.
Stanley: You said bring a toothbrush.
Michael: Stanley.
Stanley: Is this an overnight?
Michael: Maybe. The suspense is just so exciting, isn't it?
Stanley: Should my wife tell her boss she's not coming in tomorrow?
Michael: Maybe, I don't know.
Stanley: Not maybe, yes or no.
Michael: Well, no, but... okay, don't spoil it for everybody. All right? But we are going on a booze cruise on Lake Wallenpaupack.
Stanley: In January?
Michael: It's cheaper.


The idea of an alternate reality game having absolute no rules really is contrary to gameplay. Or rather, it's a different -style- of gameplay being attempted here, and it does not compute, at least by the genre covered at this site. It authors confusion, and as shown in this game, unrepentent and untrackable hijackability. The people who have fun are the ones who are willing to shrug off uncertainty and trust for the sake of the unknown, spontaneity.

We like to know the people who run a game are in control of a game. Thus, a necessary outcome of that process is a place players can communicate with each other freely, without uncertainty of what's 'real' or not. At the very least, it gives the PMs an opportunity to provide an example of their trustworthiness by allowing players that space, that one place where they know that 'real' is 'real'. So, outside UF, in theory anything can go, depending on how the PM wants to play out their game. But removing all rules altogether either throws trust out the window, or it's simply not the kind of game played at UF.

If y'all haven't already, I'd strongly recommend reading Dave Szulborski's book This Is Not A Game (I know, Star, you have a venomous distaste for that term) - I'm reading through it right now, and it's really, really good. Heck I'll loan you my copy when I'm done if you want Wink
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:46 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
ndemeter
Entrenched


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 1037
Location: Sunny California!

God, reading Star's and her guest's replies to my posts brings forth such an urge to reply and continue the arguments such as "the TOS is clearly posted here" and "since I'm a mod in these forums I read everything so I was indeed forced to watch Star blatantly break the rules"...

But who cares..

It is rather obvious that a clear philosophical difference exists between myself and Star in terms of how a game should be run and within what boundaries (or with no boundaries in her case). And since I no longer care to continue a discussion here that has become clearly META I just want to say that causality dictates that I no longer trust Star and I respectfully opt out any of her future projects.
_________________
Twitter: NickoDM - XBL: NickoDM

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:56 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
jamesi
Sentient Being


Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 2195
Location: Canadia

Star Spider wrote:
These games are designed to reach out to you in every aspect of your life. People work hard in these games to make the 'alternate reality' hard to distinguish from 'reality'. I think if you have a problem with the idea of not knowing if someone is a 'real' person or an ARG character, you might want to reconsider your hobby.


My two cents:

(1) Not all of 'these games' are designed to reach out to you in every aspect of your life, and while some of 'these games' certainly involve interaction with the audience, it's interaction that has been invited. Unless it's a game designed by someone who decides that the need to tell the narrative trumps the trust of the audience they are telling their story to, and those games aren't fun for all.

(2) Speaking as both a player and a developer, ARGs that blur the lines between reality and the 'alternate reality' by confusing the audience set a dangerous precedent. As a player, I would never get involved in a game where it was unclear how intrusive the game would be, and as a developer, I would never want to alienate or cause panic/fear in players by failing to set clear boundaries between the world they live in and the world they play in.

(3) To each their own, but the suggestion that people who took issue with how this 'experience' unfolded should 'reconsider [their] hobby' is short-sighted and mildly insulting. Nicko has an opinion about your game hijack, and you summarily discounted his opinions with a backhanded statement that was neither constructive nor fair. While the META discussion about this experience seems interesting to me, comments like that are a thorn in the side of civil discourse.

Shadow E. Coyote wrote:
A lot of stuff...


I disagree with so much that you wrote, but can sum it up with one sentence: Perhaps you should have attempted to understand the "hows and whys of this place" before you ran in with your own set of rules, which now appears to be a hasty and inappropriate decision, considering the terms of service agreement you should have read through before posting here.

To get a better sense of the "hows and whys of this place" I recommend reading through the various threads in the General META Discussion section. There are many discussions -- some which mirror the situations that are being discussed here -- which help to show how things have become the way they are.
_________________
Digital Trail | Twitter | Retired ARGFest-o-Con 2012 Project Manager

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:23 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
vpisteve
Asshatministrator


Joined: 30 Sep 2002
Posts: 2441
Location: 1987

Re: This is not a game? Then why all the rules?
Forum Dogma, Censorship, and The Impediment of Creativity!

Shadow E. Coyote wrote:
- Why not? Why are the rules like this? Forgive my not understanding of the intent and nature of these rules, but I'm not quite sure what the issue is? Why is posting in character wrong? The internet is technically (in a sense) one giant ARG, no one is really as they seem - heck, even avatars are an 'alternate reality' of the self.


*sigh*
First, I love this subject description, throwing around "dogma," "censorship," and "impediment of creativity." You forgot "they just don't understand my innovative genius!" This makes me laugh. And I hear the echoes of laughter from the last seven years or so. Having characters post on unfiction is neither innovative or creative, sorry.

Unfiction has basically one rule (or dogma, as was so eloquently put): Post as yourself, no in-game characters. Why? There are lots of reasons, but mostly we've not just theorized but witnessed the results of this sort of "innovation" firsthand. It's one of those things that yeah, sounds so cool and edgy and fun in theory, but invariably ends in flames, not the least of which is a breach of trust.

Shadow E. Coyote wrote:
Unless you have specifically met the person you are chatting with in real life, you really don't know who you are talking to... So where's the problem?


And here you've kind of made my point. The fact that we don't necessarily know each other IRL means that we trust that we are who we say we are. I know that sounds all lofty and noble and philosophical, but there are tangible implications to this, and tangible consequences when the trust is broken. Back in the day, we watched forums descend into chaos when characters were let loose to mingle with real players, so it was decided that we'd make it policy that it not happen here.

You are correct, there are no rules for ARGs. They live everywhere, pretty much. There are, however, rules for Unfiction that, if you're as creative as you say you are, you'll be able to respect and work around, instead of just blatantly breaking because you're idea is so damn new and cool and innovative and dare I say fascinating that it'll teach these dogmatic administrators and community members a thing or to. That's just how it is, and you're not going to talk us out of it by trying to justify it. We've heard it all before, believe me.

So spare us your creative indignation. Get in line pal, and the line starts back in 2002.
_________________
Making the world a better place, one less mime at a time.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:45 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

Some various thoughts:

1. The TOS of any internet site are there for a reason. Even if you don't agree with the reason, you are violating the rules of the site when you break the TOS.
2. One essential reason that unfiction can't allow characters to post is that players need a place to post free of the input/scrutiny of the PMs. If you've played any games, you will understand why that is true. Even games that have in-game forums are discussed here on uf, because players here know that they are talking to other players - not the PMs.

We have enough issues with guest posts being assumed to be hints or solves from PMs (see TIMM). If the PMs were allowed to post here, every solve, every solution and every spec posted might be thought of as coming from them. The game would be totally manipulated by input from PMs who the players mistakenly thought were players. Also, the PMs can then act as shills promoting the game under the cover of being players.

3. There is no question that Star was misleading/shilling the players through some of her posts (see above). Example: she posted photos on her blog of the package that thebruce got...but those photos weren't taken by thebruce- so she had to have gotten them from someone else. That person had to have been one of the creators of the game. Yet, she still claimed not to know who was behind the game. To me, that is enough to eliminate any trust I had given her.

4. Just because you haven't met a person live, face to face, in person, doesn't mean you don't know them. I suggest that if you can't tell the difference between having a relationship with real people and interacting with fictional characters(even characters as powerfully human as Melissa from ilb), maybe you're the one who needs to rethink what ARGs are about.

Examples: I've played games with enaxor, drizzjr, sapagoo and sidtheduck (among others). I've never met them, but I trust them completely. I consider each of them a friend and would do anything to help them that I could if they ever needed me or my support.

I organized the first ARGFest-o-con in NYC having only met one other person from this forum (bagsbee). Clearly not meeting any of the unfiction crowd in person didn't matter to me. I felt they were my friends and people I wanted to spend time with, despite never having met them, or any of the speakers, before.
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:59 pm
Last edited by rose on Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Gupfee
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2002
Posts: 817
Location: Massachusetts

Re: This is not a game? Then why all the rules?

vpisteve wrote:

Unfiction has basically one rule (or dogma, as was so eloquently put): Post as yourself, no in-game characters. Why? There are lots of reasons, but mostly we've not just theorized but witnessed the results of this sort of "innovation" firsthand. It's one of those things that yeah, sounds so cool and edgy and fun in theory, but invariably ends in flames, not the least of which is a breach of trust.


I'd say "amen" but does that mean I'm promoting dogma? Wink

I'd just like to add that there is a thin line between "edgy" and "idiotic waste of time" that, although subjective, has been firmly crossed here.

There are plenty of other good games with fun interactions in N&R. I suggest people take their time and effort over there.
_________________
It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities without your help. - Judith Martin

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:05 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

/me takes her time and energy elsewhere. Gupfee, I didn't see your post until after I posted.
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:10 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Shadow E. Coyote
Guest


 WOW
This is not a game! Or is it?

Dear moderators:

WOW, I'm sorry to have created such a ruckus, I didn't realize how sensitive this topic was in here...

OK, let me just say right off the top that I don't intend to break any more of your rules, or wish to come in here to kick over any of your meticulously built sand castles. It's your sand box, it's your rules, and I understand totally. Mea Culpa.

It's really not that different from when I have visited a fundamentalist mosque with my wife... If we want to go in and play, she has to cover her head, period, no discussion, and there is no changing their minds. If we wanted open minded talk, that clearly is not the mosque to go to, just as it is in here. If we really wanted to have an open minded discussion about gaming with people who value the first amendment over the need for rules and order, then really we'd have to go somewhere else, or start one of our own... (Which we have no desire to do.)

I get it, and I am sorry for offending you. Also, I am sorry if what I just wrote offended you! (Sometimes there is no winning.)

Oh and let's get this out of the way shall we?

I never claimed to be a creative genius, (But thanks for thinking so.)
I never said I was "as creative as I said I was", (Though I get by.)
and I honestly believe that yes, though Storm and myself have been playing / running games for many many years, that really doesn't mean much and it certainly doesn't mean we know any more or less than anyone else in here... (But again, thanks for thinking so.)

Now back to the point at hand, creative censorship!

Don't kid yourselves - you COULD build a flexible framework in here that could not only allow for order, but would also allow people to post in character, you are surely at least as creative and as smart as Star is. You COULD do it if you wanted to, but let's be honest now, basically, you just don't want to - and hey - it's your sandbox, and it's your rules.

The very much lauded concept of "This is not a game" seems to me to be somewhat of a red herring because as soon things feel the least bit "real", then fear sets in and a Game Over is called. In many of the previous posts, I am hearing a lot of fear; fear of loss of control, fear of the unknown, fear of deception... Hey, you're not alone, I feel fear too. I fear that all of this fear, and the need to contain all that fear (via order and control), seems to be at the very root of much in the ARG world.

And what of trust?

Just because someone posts in character or blurs the lines between fantasy and reality, does that mean that they can't be trusted? Really? Sure, just like "no means no" - that's certainly not in question - but really, this is an online forum, does it really cause harm to muddy the waters? Is there no middle ground?

Seems like for Cryptfiend, there is a middle ground, and clearly (he/she) is carefully considering both the pros and cons of both sides, and that I applaud. But I'm not trying to draw divisions in here, I'm just voicing an opinion, and I'm not posting "in character" in here, as Shadow is my actual name. But even with that said, and even if I am being totally sincere, for all any of you know, all these posting are a part of some kind of game right now.

Think about it for a second...

Let's call the game "Hijack".

"Jackers" (people playing the game) get points for hijacking online games and forums and get points for various actions... (Too many to list here) Interactions with "Oblivions" (all the people who are unwittingly playing) are the way to get points. So for example, the more you can get an "Oblivion" to post, the more points you get (1 point per character they type). If you hijack a game you get a bunch of points, if you hijack a hijack - even more... (Think of it as an online version of "Killer" where the targets are the general public instead of your willing friends.)

Now I'm not saying that I am playing this with all of you now... Or am I?

No, really I'm not.

Or am I?

Aren't games fun! Wink

P.S. If what if have said is confusing or unclear in any way, then please watch South Park's "Cartoon Wars" part 1 and 2, to illustrate how bending the first amendment will ultimately lead to breaking it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_Wars_Part_I

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:40 pm
 Back to top 
teh_lisa
Entrenched


Joined: 27 Nov 2005
Posts: 950
Location: my chair

Re: WOW
This is not a game! Or is it?

Wow. I find you to be a pompous ass. Could you please tell us who you are so I can not play anything you try to run? Seriously though, you come across as arrogant with nothing to back it up.

Quote:
Don't kid yourselves - you COULD build a flexible framework in here that could not only allow for order, but would also allow people to post in character, you are surely at least as creative and as smart as Star is. You COULD do it if you wanted to, but let's be honest now, basically, you just don't want to - and hey - it's your sandbox, and it's your rules.


And you just as easily could create a place such as this. Don't kid yourself, you didn't because it wouldn't be fun to be the only person there. This sandbox has pastries and chocolate. It works just fine.
_________________
drop it like it's hot

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 7 of 10 [144 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Old News & Rumors
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group