Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
  

The time now is Wed Nov 13, 2024 6:30 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)		 View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Low-Volume Games
[TSO] New Link and the MOLE
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 6 [78 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
keroberos324
Boot


Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 20

 		Maybe eye set up a trap to give the hitman some fake address? Maybe there's some trap at the Address.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:37 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
hx.3
Boot


Joined: 05 Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Location: halifax london

 		that would be good... but weve told eve havent we?
_________________
leave the bourbon on the shelf, and I'll drink it by myself

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:49 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Bruce
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 673
Location: Sector 001
amandel wrote:
Just one more thing to worry about....this tweet:


Our 2nd objective from TSO's blog was "to find out whether E.Y.E. can still be trusted." Do we have a definite answer now?


Why would EYE have allowed us to chat with Adam 2012 if he wanted to kill Eve? Wouldn't it have been easier to keep us in the dark and let the hitman do his job?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:55 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
LaythT
Boot

Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol, UK

 		Eye just twittered:

Quote:
EyeAmHere: E.Y.E. have stated before and will state again: E.Y.E. am neutral. Both S.T.V. as well as T.S.O. can use E.Y.E.'s facility.


interesting...

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:08 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Merago
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 341
Bruce wrote:
amandel wrote:
Just one more thing to worry about....this tweet:


Our 2nd objective from TSO's blog was "to find out whether E.Y.E. can still be trusted." Do we have a definite answer now?


Why would EYE have allowed us to chat with Adam 2012 if he wanted to kill Eve? Wouldn't it have been easier to keep us in the dark and let the hitman do his job?


I agree. This latest development is a little confusing.
EYE seems quite pleased with itself that it's located the mole within TSO, this would suggest it's working for TSO, yet it looks like the solution to the validate your answer puzzle has been passed on to the hitman. This must mean that either EYE is a double agent, and we've played right in to it's virtual hands, making us the fall guy for the real mole whilst also stitching up Eve, or, EYE set this elaborate trap up genuinely hoping to find the real mole. If the latter is the case, then I guess Eve is in no immediate danger. I do get the distinct impression that the former is the more likely of the two scenarios though.

EDIT: -Hmm, based on that latest twitter, I guess he's less double agent, more devil's advocate.
_________________
Playing:
Following:

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:10 am
 View user's profile
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
Bruce
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 673
Location: Sector 001

 		My question (which I posed to EYE) is - why would Dante create an AI that would help his father's murderer(s)?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Merago
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 341

 		[SPEC]I guess EYE is working towards it's own (presumably originally Dante's) agenda. Perhaps it's neutral in the TSO - STV fight, but is aiming for the greater good of our timeline? Or some other goal maybe? Whatever, it's proven it can't be trusted.
_________________
Playing:
Following:

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:22 am
 View user's profile
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
Olorin
Unfettered

Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 613
Location: Gainesville, FL
Merago wrote:
[SPEC]I guess EYE is working towards it's own (presumably originally Dante's) agenda. Perhaps it's neutral in the TSO - STV fight, but is aiming for the greater good of our timeline? Or some other goal maybe? Whatever, it's proven it can't be trusted.


As a software craftsman, I can pitch in regarding the possible directives for an AI like EYE. There's a few options:

1~ Preserve all humans above all else
This leads in the problem of "What to do when the interests/needs of some humans go directly against the interests/needs of others?" which would be logically resolved by supporting the group with more people in it.

2~ Preserve certain humans above all else
e.g.: "Preserve the people in TSO above all else" which is the same as option 1, except it includes a built-in pre-defined solution for conflicts among groups

3~ Preserve yourself (EYEself?) above all else

The questions:

Q1: Did the creator of EYE (Dante) encoded either of these options in EYE or did he create an AI free to pick its own directives?

Q2: Assuming the answer to Q1 is that the directive was encoded into EYE, which of the options described above was used?

Q3: Whether the directives were set in place when EYE was created or not, can EYE over-write those directives? If so, EYE might have done so at some point in time (e.g.: when it "became self-aware", or when it tinkered with TSO's encryption scheme)
_________________
Playing: nothing right now (odd, definitely odd)

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:41 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Olorin
Unfettered

Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 613
Location: Gainesville, FL

 		Just saw a twitter from EYE which fits here:

Quote:

EyeAmHere: E.Y.E. have stated before and will state again: E.Y.E. am neutral. Both S.T.V. as well as T.S.O. can use E.Y.E.'s facility.


..is STV usiong EYE's chatroom ?
_________________
Playing: nothing right now (odd, definitely odd)

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:42 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Merago
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 341
Olorin wrote:
Merago wrote:
[SPEC]I guess EYE is working towards it's own (presumably originally Dante's) agenda. Perhaps it's neutral in the TSO - STV fight, but is aiming for the greater good of our timeline? Or some other goal maybe? Whatever, it's proven it can't be trusted.


As a software craftsman, I can pitch in regarding the possible directives for an AI like EYE. There's a few options:

1~ Preserve all humans above all else
This leads in the problem of "What to do when the interests/needs of some humans go directly against the interests/needs of others?" which would be logically resolved by supporting the group with more people in it.

2~ Preserve certain humans above all else
e.g.: "Preserve the people in TSO above all else" which is the same as option 1, except it includes a built-in pre-defined solution for conflicts among groups

3~ Preserve yourself (EYEself?) above all else

The questions:

Q1: Did the creator of EYE (Dante) encoded either of these options in EYE or did he create an AI free to pick its own directives?

Q2: Assuming the answer to Q1 is that the directive was encoded into EYE, which of the options described above was used?

Q3: Whether the directives were set in place when EYE was created or not, can EYE over-write those directives? If so, EYE might have done so at some point in time (e.g.: when it "became self-aware", or when it tinkered with TSO's encryption scheme)


Good point Olorin, I had forgotten about Asimov's 3 Laws of Robotics. I guess EYE could have the 3 laws as it's principal driving forces.
_________________
Playing:
Following:

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:49 am
 View user's profile
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
AUZ505
Unfictologist


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1599
Location: Germany
Olorin wrote:
Just saw a twitter from EYE which fits here:

Quote:

EyeAmHere: E.Y.E. have stated before and will state again: E.Y.E. am neutral. Both S.T.V. as well as T.S.O. can use E.Y.E.'s facility.


..is STV usiong EYE's chatroom ?


Hmm...
If we are correct, the T.S.O. chat is a IG ressource so we normally could not use it as our OOG chat. But I assume the PM's will respect that we use it as our chat.
On the other side I personally would prefer to use the real OOG chat at #pharmament, but I am usually alone there.
_________________
Playing:

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
LaythT
Boot

Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol, UK

 		what's the link for that chat AUZ?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Bruce
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 673
Location: Sector 001

 		New Tweet from TSO2009:
Quote:
TSO2009 Rest In Peace
half a minute ago from web


PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
LaythT
Boot

Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Location: Bristol, UK

 		eye just twittered:
Quote:

@amandel77 - unfortunately, things are a bit more complicated. Maybe E.Y.E. will appear in the chat today to define my loyalties.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
AUZ505
Unfictologist


Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 1599
Location: Germany
LaythT wrote:
what's the link for that chat AUZ?


There is not directly a link. You can use any IRC client or use the unfiction chat client: http://www.unfiction.com/chat

More info on IRC you can find in this thread
_________________
Playing:

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 6 [78 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Low-Volume Games
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group