Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:04 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Purity Towers
Call to Define Community Standards
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 2 [19 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
Asphodel
Boot


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 54

Call to Define Community Standards

The depth of roleplaying in this game is, as far as I know, unprecedented in ARGs.

This means many things: that we have no pre-existing community standards for dealing with the situation; that it falls on us to create those standards; that other games of this nature, if they are made, will likely follow our standards; that how we conduct ourselves today may very well determine not only how but whether future games of this kind will be created and played.

I want to form these customs deliberately, rather than let them grow knobbly and accidental. I think it behooves us to take the time and care to do this properly, to make it work, so that games like this will continue to be made.


- = o = -


The following is my personal proposal on what our standard should be.

Ideally, uF should be a wholly OOG forum. That means no roleplaying. To the extent that we are, or sympathize with, Grotians or Proscripts or dragons or whatever, we are effectively In Game, and should not post on uF.

We can of course come here and read here and post here, but we will do so strictly Out Of Character. We will solve puzzles, speculate on the plot, discuss ARG design, and make idle chatter. We will not talk about how good or bad the members of [political group] are.

The OOGness of uF would, then, serve two major purposes, provide two major kinds of safe haven.

The first is the one it has always served: to be a place where we can, as players, solve puzzles and exchange clues without IG characters overhearing.

The second is the new one that has never been needed in an ARG before this one: to be a place where we can remember and reassert that we are not characters, but real people; that despite claims to the contrary, it's just a game; that whatever our IG political disagreements, we're still all friends.

It may turn out to be impossible, for whatever reasons, for uF to serve that second purpose. If that is the case, then another forum should be created to be that second haven. We would then have one forum OOC and one forum OOG.

I believe that the existence of a haven substantially alters the character of actions taken outside the safe haven. Seeing reality helps us not to believe in the masque.
_________________
asphodel.storm at gmail.com

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:31 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
FSURobbie
Guest


It's an interesting conundrum and a testament to Funnel because you're right, I can't really think of a similar situation arising in the past. The price of blazing trails is having to chart unknown territory.

While I like all your suggestions I'm not sure they will cover the full scope of our problem here. We have two factions diametrically opposed to one another and even if we take our IG cap off when posting to uF the reality of it is that I think there will still be issues.

For instance, the use of spoilers and the admonition that certain messages are "Grotian only", can't really be enforced and while we might all agree that this is an OOG haven what is to stop players from the Proscript party from reading and using that intel to their advantage? The honor code? That would ideally be enough but I don't think it would work too well in practice.

It's an interesting dilemma because this game could have instances where, for instance, a Proscript puzzle that players are trying to solve being posted to uF could be counter-productive simply because while GU players may have their cap off, they will have still read and possibly helped solve the puzzle and therefore have "insider info", and despite their best efforts that knowledge will shape and direct their actions IG.

I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the problem. It's as complex as our story and I think it's going to take some teamwork to problem solve this issue. I agree that some standards would help, but defining them is going to be tricky.

What does everyone else think?

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:36 am
 Back to top 
Asphodel
Boot


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 54

FSURobbie wrote:
For instance, the use of spoilers and the admonition that certain messages are "Grotian only", can't really be enforced and while we might all agree that this is an OOG haven what is to stop players from the Proscript party from reading and using that intel to their advantage? The honor code? That would ideally be enough but I don't think it would work too well in practice.


My first reaction on reading this was that this is fundamentally no different from trusting the PMs not to peek in the forum. But it is different.

Betrayal of this trust (in either case) could potentially ruin puzzles or even the game as a whole. We lose nothing by trusting the PMs, because they have the power to destroy the game already. But when trusting one another, we run a much greater risk -- even a single random troll could bring the game crashing down.

FSURobbie wrote:
It's an interesting dilemma because this game could have instances where, for instance, a Proscript puzzle that players are trying to solve being posted to uF could be counter-productive simply because while GU players may have their cap off, they will have still read and possibly helped solve the puzzle and therefore have "insider info", and despite their best efforts that knowledge will shape and direct their actions IG.


It may be that there can be no safe haven for puzzle-solving in a game like this, that part of the challenge (and very ARGish creeping paranoia) of the game is deciding who to trust with your secrets.

I'm okay with that. We can still come here to decompress; we will simply be socializing rather than puzzle-solving. uF will still do its job: it will insure that the IG tensions are less like Livejournal than like Werewolf.

It would be a very different social dynamic than most ARGs, but I think it could work.
_________________
asphodel.storm at gmail.com

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
PinkCloud
Decorated


Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 175
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Archie Rebel FB Fanclub

Why has the Archie Rebel Fanclub on Facebook been shut down today? Without notice to anyone?
Is this helping with the reunion? Is this someone's idea of fair gameplay?

guys, STOP mixing up your player personas with your behaviour as a
player. The player personas/characters were supposed to be in civil
war with each other, and not the players. Seems some of you have
gotten that messed up.

Some of us have been contributing quite a lot to the Archie Fanclub. Shutting it down is heartless and doesn't make any sense in the game. Whoever feels addressed here: put it back up!

edit: even better - we made a new one. Anyone with respect for fairness is welcome to our Archie Rebel Fanclub http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=121361292220&ref=ts
_________________
ARGs blur the lines between reality and fiction - too much or not enough? http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=27782
Research: http://www.pixelidentities.com/


PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:10 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Rosemarie_Weissenfeld
Decorated

Joined: 08 Aug 2009
Posts: 172
Location: slidell, LA

That I do apologize for, I was trying to clear game stuff from my person Facebook page and had not had a chance to create it again on my ARG facebook.I was also removing all the people here that are on my personal facebook as well, so that when its all over I can just add you to my ARG facebook page. My family was getting confused and hurt by some posts on my facebook and I actually got yelled at by my sister for it because she thought that I was talking about her and it got ugly. So I will take responsibility for the removal of the group. I didn't inform anyone because other that doing that I was not on that much yesterday due to some RL issues. Again I do apologize for removing the group without warning.

Anyways so then lets get this game rolling again and see it to the end because well, we have all gotten so tangled in it that it is only right we all see it to the end. All bullcrap and issues aside, lets get this going again.

And as for the topic of this post. I do agree that we did get too IC in all the posts here in uF and maybe its because someone of us could not turn off the characters we got into, either way, we will have to learn to keep IC and IG things off here and just learn to work as a community again. I do understand the problem that comes from the blah blah blah side only and all that, but what we have to remember is that there is supposed to be a code of honor between us all. I ws told there have been other games where sides have been chosen, maybe not to this extent, but they managed to keep uF to be neutral and posted everything here and worked as a whole. Why was this game so different? Did we all really get that wrapped up that we forgot to be ourselves when it came to uF? I mean we all took a wrong turn somewhere, none of us are without our faults in this. And I think those of us who ae willing to admit we made mistakes and got wrapped up in our IG personas are the ones who will be able to put it all aside and work together again.

This has definitely been a learning experience for all of us, not just the players, but I am sure the PMs have learned something from it too, and hopfully the next time we all play something like this again we can remember what happened here and not let ourselves do it all over again. That being said, game on everybody!

PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:07 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
diszaster
Unfettered

Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 405

Probably the most basic thing the community needs to do is accept the distinction between IG/OOG (in/out of game) and IC/OOC (in/out of character). You can be out of the game and also be in character (posting propaganda on an OOG forum), just like you can be IG and be OOC (in an IG chat room being yourself).

This distinction is not relevant for "roleplay-enforced" games because the only in-game space -is- in-character. Here's what I mean. In an rp-enforced game, the only "actionable" knowledge a player has is the knowledge that his/her character has. Character X cannot accuse Character Y of something unless the character has learned about it directly through the game (IG). Just because someone told the player something in an OOG setting doesn't mean that the character knows about it in the game.

Of course, this is non-enforceable except through immortal/pm oversight, but for the most part, players in rp-enforced games tend accept this as the community norm because this is stated as the community norm at the outset.

I've found that ARG players rarely play anything other than exaggerated, slightly more obsessive versions of themselves, even in this game. (No, this is not meant as an insult or a put-down). So I guess this hasn't come up before. (but, honestly, I doubt it will come up again)

Anyway, if we can make the distinction between "-game" and "-character" then I think we'll at least be able to clarify the issue, and then make decisions about what is acceptable and nonacceptable behavior as a community.

Just my 2 cents.

Edit: Oh, and on making some information on uF "for X eyes only"--honor codes only work if everyone agrees to them. And I know I didn't, probably wasn't ever asked.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:25 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
PinkCloud
Decorated


Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 175
Location: Zurich, Switzerland

disza wrote:
Probably the most basic thing the community needs to do is accept the distinction between IG/OOG (in/out of game) and IC/OOC (in/out of character). You can be out of the game and also be in character (posting propaganda on an OOG forum), just like you can be IG and be OOC (in an IG chat room being yourself).


No, disza, you can't do that here.

Quoting the Terms of Service - again- :
http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5
(bold in original version)

TOS wrote:
Users are explicitly forbidden to post as characters, whether in the capacity of a registered member or a forum guest, to post in a fashion designed to covertly influence or otherwise finesse players, or in an attempt to move a game forward. In this sense, the Unfiction forums are "out of game" and are not to become part of the "in game" experience or to be manipulated by Puppetmasters. This also pertains to people attempting to mislead other players ("hijacking" the game).


disza wrote:
Anyway, if we can make the distinction between "-game" and "-character" then I think we'll at least be able to clarify the issue, and then make decisions about what is acceptable and nonacceptable behavior as a community.


This is about unacceptable behavior, and it has not so much to do with a lack of distinction between character and roles, but mostly with taste and fairness - something which some players here are sadly lacking:

TOS wrote:
More specifically, members and guests alike agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any applicable laws, including copyright laws. As well, posts that are created for the explicit purpose of criticizing in an unconstructive or insulting manner (commonly known as "flame" posts) will come under the scrutiny of the administrators and moderators.



disza wrote:
Edit: Oh, and on making some information on uF "for X eyes only"--honor codes only work if everyone agrees to them. And I know I didn't, probably wasn't ever asked.


If this was only meant ironically. you're not being asked - it is ARG common gameplay to play in a respectful manner, and you are bound to it as long as you have an account here. If only both sides would have posted from the beginning and respected each others spoilers then things might've turned out a bit different.
fyi:
TOS wrote:
In general, users should conduct themselves in respectful, appropriate ways that encourage inclusion and cooperation.

_________________
ARGs blur the lines between reality and fiction - too much or not enough? http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=27782
Research: http://www.pixelidentities.com/


PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Rosemarie_Weissenfeld
Decorated

Joined: 08 Aug 2009
Posts: 172
Location: slidell, LA

Pink Cloud, I think what Disza was trying to talk about was the whole, in this games case, Proscript and Grotian thing, we were not necessarily characters, but we did play our sides on the board with the whole x-group only spoiler tags. I do not think it was meant as the characters we took in as our game personas but more the playing sides on here.

Anyways the whole point of this topic is because the ToS does not actually touch on the playing sides aspect. That's why this topic was made, so we could better figure out how to go about posting on uF if another game ends up having to be played like this one, where everyone not only chooses sides but has to be respectful to the..uh..privacy of the opposing sides spoilers and such.

We need to establish rules for this type of situation in the future.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:50 pm
Last edited by Rosemarie_Weissenfeld on Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:02 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Asphodel
Boot


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 54

PinkCloud wrote:
disza wrote:
Probably the most basic thing the community needs to do is accept the distinction between IG/OOG (in/out of game) and IC/OOC (in/out of character). You can be out of the game and also be in character (posting propaganda on an OOG forum), just like you can be IG and be OOC (in an IG chat room being yourself).


No, disza, you can't do that here.

I don't think it's quite as simple as I think you think. (...so clearly I cannot choose the glass in front of me...)
PinkCloud wrote:

Quoting the Terms of Service - again- :
http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5
(bold in original version)

TOS wrote:
Users are explicitly forbidden to post as characters, whether in the capacity of a registered member or a forum guest, to post in a fashion designed to covertly influence or otherwise finesse players, or in an attempt to move a game forward. In this sense, the Unfiction forums are "out of game" and are not to become part of the "in game" experience or to be manipulated by Puppetmasters. This also pertains to people attempting to mislead other players ("hijacking" the game).


(italics mine)

While many of us were "post[ing] as characters", I don't think any of us were doing so "in a fashion designed to covertly influence or otherwise finess players, or in an attempt to move a game forward."

Your interpretation may ultimately turn out to be correct, but it is by no means obvious. The rule you're quoting is clearly aimed at "Puppetmasters" and "people attempting to mislead other players". Ordinary players naturally tend to glaze over the rule.


PinkCloud wrote:

disza wrote:
Anyway, if we can make the distinction between "-game" and "-character" then I think we'll at least be able to clarify the issue, and then make decisions about what is acceptable and nonacceptable behavior as a community.


This is about unacceptable behavior, and it has not so much to do with a lack of distinction between character and roles, but mostly with taste and fairness - something which some players here are sadly lacking:

TOS wrote:
More specifically, members and guests alike agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any applicable laws, including copyright laws. As well, posts that are created for the explicit purpose of criticizing in an unconstructive or insulting manner (commonly known as "flame" posts) will come under the scrutiny of the administrators and moderators.


Does it still count if you're only being slanderous, hateful, etc. against fictional characters (including players' characters)? OMG teh sith are like totally evil.


PinkCloud wrote:

disza wrote:
Edit: Oh, and on making some information on uF "for X eyes only"--honor codes only work if everyone agrees to them. And I know I didn't, probably wasn't ever asked.


If this was only meant ironically. you're not being asked - it is ARG common gameplay to play in a respectful manner, and you are bound to it as long as you have an account here. If only both sides would have posted from the beginning and respected each others spoilers then things might've turned out a bit different.
fyi:
TOS wrote:
In general, users should conduct themselves in respectful, appropriate ways that encourage inclusion and cooperation.

I think I agree here. One could argue, perhaps, that "keep out no boys alloud" signs discourage inclusion and cooperation, but their larger function is the same as that of the no-Puppetmasters rule: to allow forumites to collaborate on solving puzzles without fear of unfriendly eyes.



I don't outright disagree with anything you've said, but at the same time I don't think the situation is as straightforward and obvious as you seem to imply.
_________________
asphodel.storm at gmail.com

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
diszaster
Unfettered

Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 405

PinkCloud wrote:

No, disza, you can't do that here.
Quoting the Terms of Service - again- :


I wasn't advocating it, I was describing it. Please note that I myself haven't posted in uF in character in any way, at any time. You can check my profile if you want.

PinkCloud wrote:

This is about unacceptable behavior, and it has not so much to do with a lack of distinction between character and roles, but mostly with taste and fairness - something which some players here are sadly lacking: (another quote from ToS)


I'm just saying that it would be easier to decide what is acceptable in RP and ARG gameplay (including concepts of fairness) if we actually avoided the concept of "taste."

I suppose that you're also insinuating that my gameplay in particular was lacking in taste and fairness, and also that I've broken yet another clause in the ToS. But perhaps we should talk about that when the game is actually over. Let me just say this: I was playing a character, who no one approached in a respectful manner.

PinkCloud wrote:

If this was only meant ironically. you're not being asked - it is ARG common gameplay to play in a respectful manner, and you are bound to it as long as you have an account here. If only both sides would have posted from the beginning and respected each others spoilers then things might've turned out a bit different.
fyi:
TOS wrote:
In general, users should conduct themselves in respectful, appropriate ways that encourage inclusion and cooperation.


No I wasn't being ironic. We all have an equal share in uF, and the idea that any one group could expect to carve out a space in uF for themselves is both exclusionary and impracticable. Players can carve out spaces for distinct, exclusive groups for sharing information elsewhere (and, for the most part, did).

Are you basically saying that, for me to be part of this community (and have an account on uF), I -have- to post? I agreed to the ToS. I did not agree to being pressured to post. I didn't agree to other players telling me not to read things on uF, nor did I agree to other players telling me how to play a character/what my character should do.

* Edited it to be a little less incendiary, and a little more clear.

And on this:
Asphodel wrote:
Does it still count if you're only being slanderous, hateful, etc. against fictional characters (including players' characters)?


This makes me think about something else that's been bothering me: should players' characters be treated differently from "game" characters during gameplay (not just as a subject of uF)? Just posing the question.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:01 am
Last edited by diszaster on Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:42 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Asphodel
Boot


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 54

disza wrote:

And on this:
Asphodel wrote:
Does it still count if you're only being slanderous, hateful, etc. against fictional characters (including players' characters)?


This makes me think about something else that's been bothering me: should players' characters be treated differently from "game" characters during gameplay (not just as a subject of uF)? Just posing the question.


I don't know either.

On the one hand, there's certainly much more potential for hurt feelings with PCs.

On the other hand, the objection to players reading information labeled for "the other team" seems to attribute an almost PM-like duty to players, not to let their characters "overhear" things said in uF.

My personal belief in this case seems to be towards the maximally restrictive interpretation: PCs have player-like rights (you shouldn't be abusive to them), but character-like responsibilities (they shouldn't read your posts on uF).


I seem to have drifted off of your point that I was quoting and back to the topic of team-spoilering.

There is a much more fundamental question lurking here, underlying the obvious one about respecting keep-out signs. The PMs want to turn us against each other, make us paranoid. Will we let them?

In order to argue the negative, I want to compare the following question: Good PMs want the ARG to invade your life wholly, to erase as fully as possible the distinction between IG and OOG. (This is the fundamental premise of ARGs.) Will we let them? Or will we create a strictly OOG forum where they cannot come?


This is not just a mechanical argument over what the uF TOS says. It is a normative one over how it should be written in the future.
_________________
asphodel.storm at gmail.com

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:59 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
diszaster
Unfettered

Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 405

Asphodel wrote:

This is not just a mechanical argument over what the uF TOS says. It is a normative one over how it should be written in the future.


Thank you.

Even for me, who wants complete freedom over the shape and behavior of a character, I can agree that these two things should be discussed as community norms for future games that might involve conflictual roleplay:

1. Players/characters should not harass other players/characters into doing things or not doing things. There are other, more cooperative ways, of influencing behavior or encouraging play.

2. Players should not pretend to be newbies to gain advantage. In some ways, I think that this is disrespectful to new players who are genuinely trying to become involved in the genre.

I'm sure that there are others, but both of these things have already happened, and not necessarily to me. And I think that both of these ideas are consistent with what the community seems to saying about proper gameplay.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:23 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Syncopal
Decorated


Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 199
Location: Look Behind You!

Well Opinions are like As#h@les and I'm a big one... so I'm going to chime in here and give mine:

(And Just a note... this is not directed at anyone in particular just something I feel I need to get off my chest.)

1. IG/OOG, IC/OOC whatever... some of you folks need to toughen up... seriously this is beginning to feel a lot like high school. If you cannot handle someone being a prick to you on the 'interwebs' then there are some issues you need to address in RL. Can you be offended? Yes... can you ignore those people? Yes. Can you throw it right back in their face? For Sure. But please stop whining about it.

2. I'm new to this and maybe its the way I came across uF originally that I feel this way, but I think its a valid point none the less. I view uF as a central communications place for these games. The way I read it as long as the PM is not guiding gameplay from here then anything posted here by the players of the game is valid and can be posted.

Having said that, I think anything thats said in these forums or on an IG site is fair game for either the players or the PM's to use for OR against you. THIS INCLUDES CHAT!! I sat for the first few days watching a lot of you in the GU chat discussing all kind of things about your real lives... and I do not have a problem with this... however if you are playing an 'Alternate Reality Game' you need to realize that those sites are 'Alternate' realities and those things might come back to haunt you. Perhaps you shouldn't be exposing yourselves like that. And yes I do understand the importance of community and how these games revolve around it and I look forward to forging friendships along the way... but I'm mainly here to PLAY the game. And there are MANY other venues for you to socialize at the are OOG and safe to do so.

AS for the spoilers and such, I have always thought it was a bit dumb but went along with it because it seemed the thing to do. And I always expected players from the other side to read them. If there was anything that I didnt really want people to see I PM'ed it.

Now having said all of that... I'm going to lay a lot of this at the PM's feet, when this thing started we were working as a group and things were going along well... then bam... we're split into two groups. Ok I like competition fine, lets get it on. Then my group the GU was split into four smaller groups... each with ther own directives and leaders. Not only that, but there was the need for extreme secrecy. SO now the player base is divded into tiny groups and no one trusts each other and each group is off doing their own thing. And I still have no idea what the ultimate goal is as we are fed info bit by bit and don't really seem to have a direction. And that's where my personal frustration started.

And this is not to say that I think we've played this game really smartly either as players. Communication has sucked and there has really been no central 'governor' who is guiding us in a direction where we need to go. I blame myself for not being able to keep up with all of the forms this game has taken... which is why I really came back here to uF and just started playing here the way I wanted to play hoping that it would become the central resource I thought it was... but that really hasnt happened....

Ok I'll now get off my soapbox... I feel better and just needed to get all of that off of my chest... this did seem to start off on the thread topic and then vear off.... so dear mods if you feel you need to bump it to another thread please do...

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
konamouse
Official uF Dietitian


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 8010
Location: My own alternate reality

Hey guys! uF is OOG. Period.

Be yourself in here. Please do not be a character. PMs often read the threads but are not allowed to participate in any thread of their own game. And they should not use info posted in here that has not been forwarded to any IG site.

This is a forum to allow the community to work TOGETHER to ENJOY a game.

The goal of any PM should be for players to ENJOY the game, and it should be in the manner each individual player wants to play the game. Some like to be completely immersed, others just like to lurk.
_________________
'squeek'
r u a Sammeeeee? I am Forever!


PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:42 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ironnikki
Unfettered


Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 502
Location: Iowa City, IA

I haven't been around much lately, so I'm not aware of recent events that have apparently sparked this debate. To be honest, I feel that this debate should have nothing to do with the ToS. It really comes down to one simple thing: Don't be a jerk. We've all got the same goal, and that is to have fun and enjoy this game. Joking around with one another is fine, but it sounds like some "jokes" were either not very joke-like, or were not received as such.

I realize that this doesn't really concern me that much, and that it's all been said before, but I'd just like to see this game remain a game, and not devolve into a flame war. It's been pretty cool so far, and I expect that it's going to get even better.
_________________
An Adventurer Is Me!
Played: Intimation, Purity Towers, Vanessa Atalanta (sort of), TV III


PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:28 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [19 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Purity Towers
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group