unforum

Arben · Boot Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Posts: 53 Location: Burbank, CA

Two of Memo#1: A Curiousity.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:17 am

_________________
This post, like so much of creation, is notArt.

My myth!

dishboy

One thing that sticks out is that the newer memo changed the addressee's name from Richard to Joe...

EDIT: Referring to Joseph Silver, perhaps?

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:19 am

_________________
-- dishboy

konamouse

Actually, the crinkles are identical - as if it is a photoshop effect.

The "Joe:" salutation is disturbing (PM error?)

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:30 am

_________________
'squeek'
r u a Sammeeeee? I am Forever!

dishboy

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:35 am

_________________
-- dishboy

Arben · Boot Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Posts: 53 Location: Burbank, CA

yep yep

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:37 am

_________________
This post, like so much of creation, is notArt.

My myth!

Max Power · Greenhorn Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 8

there is also a new posting of the other memo as well, the only plain difference is that the file size is different from the original. also, all 3 newly posted document images have the naming scheme ua.jpg, ub.jpg, and uc.jpg.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:47 am

Max Power · Greenhorn Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 8

maybe this is really obvious, but something else I just realized makes me think that we are on the right track with the alternate version of memo1.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:47 am

dishboy

MaxPower, in my opinion, that is one hell of a catch! I think that makes perfect sense and is practically pushing us towards the new, "flawed" memo. You're contributing quite a lot tonight for a supposed newbie/lurker - welcome to the crew!

So we know the memo is flawed... what does it mean? Should we just focus on the obvious change (the name), or the more subtle ones as well? (different angle of picture, tear at the bottom, etc.)

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:55 am

_________________
-- dishboy

Max Power · Greenhorn Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 8

it's hard to say, especially because the document1 link now seems to link to the jpeg of the memo that is addressed to richard (or a somehow seemingly unnoticeably different version of it)

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:08 am

Tien_Le

dreadhouse document

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 11:31 am

_________________
consume less; live more

Tien_Le

Re: Two of Memo#1: A Curiousity.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 12:00 pm

_________________
consume less; live more

fathamburger · Greenhorn Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 9

I was going over the memo's exhaustively until I noticed that had just been changed too.

yup its all richard now, I think it may have just been a mistake

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:43 pm

Impster · Boot Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 22

I don't know if this will help anyone or not. but ua looked like it had some text like the newspaper clipings. So I took it into my paint and played with it a bit. I can't make out any text. Maybe I need new glasses.. but I did come up with this image.. maybe it's me but on the lower right side that almost looks like a tunnel system. I don't know if it matches the other maps. I haven't had a chance to compare them and it's time to go home. But I thought I'd throw it up here 'fore I leave.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 6:06 pm

Loneriver · Greenhorn Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 5 Location: Jersey

Messing around with that letter to the Dread House contestants, I couldn't figure out what those faded words in the back were. But, I may be nuts here... or is that a skull in the back? (edited file attached)

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 6:21 pm

Vid · Veteran Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 117 Location: Texas

Yeah I can kinda see it too.

**Posted:** Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:33 pm