Author
Message
Xeno Lambrose
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 668
seems to be working properly now, for me also, haven't done a thorough scan, but appears to be no obivious changes
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:13 pm
MrAfroPanda
Boot
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 Posts: 45 Location: Oklahoma
the coelacanth i have studied marine biology and i would like to go on record as sating that the coelacanth is a real fish that exists in real life once thought to be extinct but was found in the 30's around the area of madagascar but most recently found in 1998 in the same area so i guess this means the anagrams idea and other things of the sort are false. Just want to put that out there
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:53 am
morrison42zero
Boot
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Left of Dallas, TX. Right of Ft. Worth.
Re: the coelacanth
MrAfroPanda wrote:
i have studied marine biology and i would like to go on record as sating that the coelacanth is a real fish that exists in real life once thought to be extinct but was found in the 30's around the area of madagascar but most recently found in 1998 in the same area so i guess this means the anagrams idea and other things of the sort are false. Just want to put that out there
OMG
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:06 am
MrAfroPanda
Boot
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 Posts: 45 Location: Oklahoma
@morrison42zero yep its all true its why i have some doubts as to the site being IG. Is it possible hes just a guy lookin for a REAL rare fish? Maybe. Is he actually IG? Maybe. Right now the website doesnt tell much. If it is involved it hasn't told us anything yet.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:18 am
morrison42zero
Boot
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Left of Dallas, TX. Right of Ft. Worth.
MrAfroPanda wrote:
@morrison42zero yep its all true its why i have some doubts as to the site being IG. Is it possible hes just a guy lookin for a REAL rare fish? Maybe. Is he actually IG? Maybe. Right now the website doesnt tell much. If it is involved it hasn't told us anything yet.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
dude, really? are you just bored or something?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:30 am
ljm
Decorated
Joined: 20 May 2009 Posts: 182
We know the fish is real. Please, please, please read the existing threads and discussion before you post again. I assure you that we all checked the wiki on Coelacanth the minute we knew it was IG. Nobody suggested it was fiction. In fact, there are literally pages of discussion regarding the coelacanth that are extremely in-depth. You would know that if you bothered to read the existing discussions and use the search function before you spammed the boards... Again.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:44 am
morrison42zero
Boot
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Left of Dallas, TX. Right of Ft. Worth.
ljm wrote:
We know the fish is real. Please, please, please read the existing threads and discussion before you post again. I assure you that we all checked the wiki on Coelacanth the minute we knew it was IG. Nobody suggested it was fiction. In fact, there are literally pages of discussion regarding the coelacanth that are extremely in-depth. You would know that if you bothered to read the existing discussions and use the search function before you spammed the boards... Again.
Please don't confuse me with him. I was literally in shock that someone would post that. Just hopin to drive him out w/ sarcasm.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:52 am
vapor
Entrenched
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Posts: 1188 Location: Dallas, TX ya'll
morrison42zero wrote:
MrAfroPanda wrote:
@morrison42zero yep its all true its why i have some doubts as to the site being IG. Is it possible hes just a guy lookin for a REAL rare fish? Maybe. Is he actually IG? Maybe. Right now the website doesnt tell much. If it is involved it hasn't told us anything yet.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
dude, really? are you just bored or something?
I don't think there's an emoticon for unnecessary spoiler tag usage so I'll just throw you a flounder.
Apparently there is no topic on UF explaining when they are warranted so I'll just say it.
Spoiler tags are only necessary when you are posting a message that could potentially give away part or all of a puzzle solve, a piece of meta information, or at times when critical plot information is given.
It is considered unnecessary spoiler tag usage when used to conceal regular game commentary, speculation or in this case trolling.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:59 am
MrAfroPanda
Boot
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 Posts: 45 Location: Oklahoma
sorry... wow the backlash of a question already asked is pretty harsh here isnt it? is this how you great newcomers to ur site? i feel like a freshman in hishschool again! wow sorry i guess im trying to stay up to date but there are literally hundreds of pages to go through even with the search bar.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:09 am
morrison42zero
Boot
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 25 Location: Left of Dallas, TX. Right of Ft. Worth.
Learn me something new everyday.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:23 am
FilmEdge
Unfettered
Joined: 21 May 2010 Posts: 645 Location: Burbank, CA
Re: sorry...
MrAfroPanda wrote:
wow the backlash of a question already asked is pretty harsh here isnt it? is this how you great newcomers to ur site? i feel like a freshman in hishschool again! wow sorry i guess im trying to stay up to date but there are literally hundreds of pages to go through even with the search bar.
First, welcome, and yes, there are a lot of pages and threads existing. Everyone would appreciate you trying to read them or at least scan them to see where the conversation has gone before your arrival.
Yep, it's a lot of work for you to read it. It was a lot of work for us to write it. We'll show you the same respect for your work in the game if you return the favor. Deal?
Catch up when you can and we'll look forward to your contributions.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:25 am
ljm
Decorated
Joined: 20 May 2009 Posts: 182
Not trying to be rude, but it's no different than someone walking up in the middle of the conversation and asking you to repeat what you just talked about for the last ten minutes. Sorry there is a lot to read, though I would consider that a signal that its probably worth reading.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:35 am
MrAfroPanda
Boot
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 Posts: 45 Location: Oklahoma
:) yay thanks for the official thanks! its appreciated! and now that i feel like im completely caught up im less than i am and with that... ill let this thread get back on topic
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:41 am
multipsychoapopheniosis
Unfettered
Joined: 22 May 2010 Posts: 325
Re: Colours
Melodyman wrote:
multipsychoapopheniosis wrote:
All v.preliminary-in a rush.....
So has anyone else been wondering why the colour changes in the background of the calenders? Hiding in plain sight and all that. Also-there are similarities between the moons and clues. I think especially interesting is 21st July - Same Moon as 22nd June AND is the date of the first lunar landing. My money's on 21st for new clues
How about simplicity as an answer..
The darker portions of the chart correspond directly to the darker moon phases, and the lighter portions correspond directly to the lighter phases..see?
The paper color becomes lighter when the moon is brighter and darker when its darker..
Voila.. Mystery solved..
Move along now..
While I like the answer, it misses the fact there are discrepancies. I mean-compare the identical weeks in June and July (18-26), they are clearly different which slightly goes against your theory. Not fully convinced........
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:54 am
Headman
Entrenched
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Michigan
I was perusing the web for something that could be our "rare fish", like a planet, meteor shower, etc to see if it matched our HLM calender. I found a neat calender on NASA site: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/calendar/monthly.cfm
It doesn't match our HLM in any way that I see, just has important dates in space exploration placed in a neat monthly calender. Just thought I'd share, now off to my car show.
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:39 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending