Author
Message
ladywyntir
Decorated
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 Posts: 172 Location: NYC
simone5p wrote:
I wonder if the person telling Josh to take down the sale listings has seen his Coelacanth journal, or if his admonition to stop posting publicly was just about Craig's List?
The mention of "sale listings" and the immediate deletion of the CL posts proved that the unknown responder was talking directly about Craigslist.
^_^
_________________
Cloverfield: Please tell me she lives on the ground floor......
Super 8: Brain Blast Fleet - Sailor Marj from Mars
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:55 pm
MrAfroPanda
Boot
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 Posts: 45 Location: Oklahoma
so we got the beginning of a conversation and its moving toward the end?! i thought we got the end and were seeing progressivley the beginning...i guess not because josh says "what is this about?!" and then above that it says "if you aree who i think you are its about youre father". why would he ask that if he was just told? he wouldnt
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:28 pm
punxtr
Die Hard Try Hard
Joined: 17 Jul 2010 Posts: 2994
Well, what I liked most about this update is that this is the full emailed conversation. Whatever else comes will not be within this same format again.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:15 am
Xeno Lambrose
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 668
Chainsaw;
I wouldn't hold my breath, if I were you, seems like there be plenty of time, young mait'ee for other dastardly dooin's!
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:13 am
MrAfroPanda
Boot
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 Posts: 45 Location: Oklahoma
yeah im guessing that there willl be more updates due to the prompt labeled print ALL pages
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:51 am
punxtr
Die Hard Try Hard
Joined: 17 Jul 2010 Posts: 2994
Chainsaw Fellatio wrote:
Well, what I liked most about this update is that this is the full emailed conversation. Whatever else comes will not be within this same format again.
I don't state anything about time here. Why would I be holding my breath?
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:42 am
Xeno Lambrose
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 668
Chainsaw;
By stating "this is the full emailed conversation."
HDYK?
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:18 pm
richiev
Boot
Joined: 26 May 2010 Posts: 45
Shouldn't we be focusing on who Josh's father is now? I have searched with no good results yet.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:26 pm
punxtr
Die Hard Try Hard
Joined: 17 Jul 2010 Posts: 2994
Xeno Lambrose wrote:
Chainsaw;
By stating "this is the full emailed conversation."
HDYK?
I do not know. I strongly believe that the last message having no carrots '>' implies that this was the complete conversation these two had before another email conversation.
Yes, I have been looking for a dad Minker too, but obviously there's not much of anything at all in this field.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:18 pm
simone5p
Boot
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 11
Chainsaw Fellatio wrote:
...I strongly believe that the last message having no carrots '>' implies that this was the complete conversation these two had before another email conversation.
not sure what you mean by before another email conversation...? but previous msgs also had no carrots for the first line... or maybe I'm not sure what you're saying.
So, Josh takes down the CL items as requested in the last msg, but what I don't get is where/how/when he was asking questions, and whether the first message Josh received, "Stop posting publicly. I can answer your questions . I have proof" is his first msg at all .
did Minker post something coded or something obvious
in his HLM or other suspected posts... i.e. the authentication request which would have shed light on his discovery of the film or "it"... How does Josh's possession of this film clip come to the attention of Mystery Person in the first place?
And which of the CL estate items (hat with monkey pin, horse clock, swan, frog, sled, polyester dress...) may be important above and beyond the film clip?
Well, these clues 1963...pill box hat... JFK's speech in the May 13th newspaper ... remind me of the infamous footage of JFK's assassination... but that's all I'm getting. Interesting though that the portion of the newspaper we can read begins with "danger in further testing." Esp. since something's been "reactivated."
We assumed Minker's dad was dead because Josh is handling his mom's affairs, but his mom and dad could have been divorced. .(ok that was a random thought).
Did father Minker work for the military? Did he make the film or find it?
Lots of questions at least!
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:10 am
k-elizabeth
Greenhorn
Joined: 29 Jul 2010 Posts: 5
Chainsaw Fellatio wrote:
Xeno Lambrose wrote:
Chainsaw;
By stating "this is the full emailed conversation."
HDYK?
I do not know. I strongly believe that the last message having no carrots '>' implies that this was the complete conversation these two had before another email conversation.
Yes, I have been looking for a dad Minker too, but obviously there's not much of anything at all in this field.
They could have had other conversations, but somehow i doubt it. To me it seems like Josh was contacted by someone he doesn't know well, and i think that if this unknown person was trying to tell josh to stop posting with some sense of urgency/anonymity that he would limit it to just one conversation and cut to the chase. I could be wrong, there is a little bit of familiarity in the dialogue, but i don't see josh and this other person having multiple conversations. I think this is just the latest dialogue exchanged and that the 'father' text is the most recent message (no carrots), and not the definite end of the conversation. The new printout just seems like an update for us of what new messages have been sent.
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:20 am
Xeno Lambrose
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 668
It looked like things (by virtue of the fewer > marks) might be winding down, but with how "out there" (which I think is a rather good thing, for the most part) JJ can be, who knows what is going to happen next.
As has been mentioned over and over, there's a long way to go before the movie begins, and I'm enjoying the roller coaster ride.
I think the real problem would be with the JJ/Spielberg team being able to live up to the hype. I can only imagine the disappointment within both camps if it turned out that the viral campaign ended up being better than the movie.
I mean, the "scariest thing I ever saw" (is obviously subjective) and seems like quite a level to achieve.
Ditto as far as looking for male "Minker" family members that are IG.
Simone5p;
You stated, "what I don't get is where/how/when he was asking questions."
Josh posted on the Top Ten Real Conspiracies website as of 6/5/10 @ 7:41pm:
"Hey - new to this site. Does anyone know the best way to authenticate something? Like old papers, photos, footage, etc? Are there experts for conspiracy related verifications? Would appreciate the help!"
http://abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread83236/pg12
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:25 am
Headman
Entrenched
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 839 Location: Michigan
Xeno Lambrose wrote:
It looked like things (by virtue of the fewer > marks) might be winding down, but with how "out there" (which I think is a rather good thing, for the most part) JJ can be, who knows what is going to happen next.
As has been mentioned over and over, there's a long way to go before the movie begins, and I'm enjoying the roller coaster ride.
I think the real problem would be with the JJ/Spielberg team being able to live up to the hype. I can only imagine the disappointment within both camps if it turned out that the viral campaign ended up being better than the movie.
I mean, the "scariest thing I ever saw" (is obviously subjective) and seems like quite a level to achieve.
Ditto as far as looking for male "Minker" family members that are IG.
Simone5p;
You stated, "what I don't get is where/how/when he was asking questions."
Josh posted on the Top Ten Real Conspiracies website as of 6/5/10 @ 7:41pm:
"Hey - new to this site. Does anyone know the best way to authenticate something? Like old papers, photos, footage, etc? Are there experts for conspiracy related verifications? Would appreciate the help!"
http://abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread83236/pg12
Yeah, been looking for the Farger as well. Like everyone else, no luck.
Wasn't the "Stop posting publicly" printout a day after the Minker ATS question? I wish there was a way to see who viewed his post that day. Whomever it is speaking with Minker must frequent that site. Maybe they stumbled upon his post, but I cannot put together how they both come to use the PDP-11 for communication purposes? Did they send Minker a PM? I don't recall seeing this, but has anyone tried to log into Minker's ATS account? They had to make the password something we have seen or could easily figure out? I mean the ATS post couldn't just be for the purpose of tying Minker to the Posting Publicly printout right? If so it was a waste IMO.
Sorry, tired and rambling.
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:24 am
Melodyman
Entrenched
Joined: 28 Nov 2007 Posts: 943 Location: Los Angeles
I would guess that the remote access for the computer which contains all the files associated with this mystery from 1979 as well as the super 8 film was among the stuff left in the attic/basement that Josh probably started sorting thru after his moms death and he has plugged it in and got this person ...Josh may even be the one who unknowingly reactivated expcnv.. .. I would guess that this belonged to Josh's dad who we may find out was working on this case back then and may have disappeared doing so..and this might be someone who knew and worked with his dad (or could it even be his Dad?) who knows about Josh and also knows that his father had this terminal so if its active again, it must be his son?. thus the need for secrecy as mentioned in the printout... in case they are watching..
Which brings us to the message hidden in the newspaper..
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:49 am
Daxter146
Greenhorn
Joined: 24 Jul 2010 Posts: 8
I think u guys r missing something big here. If u notice he says "I've been quite, please - what is this about?" he known something before this guy talked to him it seems
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:08 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending