Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 18, 2024 12:08 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
TTA: Missed Connections
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 5 of 19 [284 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ..., 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
TheNightmareComplex
Entrenched


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 989
Location: South Carolina

No one solved TTA; If people are claiming to have done so, that's silly. But, what I think you're seeing, is that people generally believe TTA to be one thing or something else, or whatever. You're right in saying we can't know what something is until it's solved, hence we

Have to solve it. The only way to do any solving in a medium like this is by posing theories and trying to see if they can fit together coherently with what we've been given.
_________________
RABBIT#098

GONNA PUNCH ALL DA SLENDERMANS


PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?


Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 2578
Location: Cowtown, AB

Om nom, tasty trolls!

Quote:
I don't have any because I don't believe it's anyone we've met. I'm not interested in taking one theory and clashing it against another, I'm more interested in the details of the information we have.


Then GTFO of the forums, yer doin' it wrong. (I'm intrigued to hear why you think it's a third party from everyone that we've met, but if you're not willing to tell it... well.)

Quote:
What if the friend wasn't comfortable with tackling Jay? Would you be willing to possibly botch the entry by having your ferocious attacker gently glide into him like he's going for a soft bear hug? Or what if he just goes for it and hurts Jay, potentially botching a night of shooting, postponing the entry further (and forcing the gracious soul who turned his house upside down to have to live in that wreck for a day longer and subjecting us to dreaded filler?)
Or you could just get the stunt double that has the right hand-eye coordination to steam-roll through Jay safely.


Yup. It's called multiple takes, and talking about what needs to get done beforehand, instead of dumping money that they have admitted that they never had on imaginary stunt doubles. I don't think it's that big of a deal and I don't know why you're making it one, other than to spiral us into a series of pointless arguments.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:27 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
JKatkinaModerator
Entrenched


Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 825
Location: Calgary, AB

TokyoVigilanteX wrote:
too many words


I know the dog thing was a joke, but I'm calling you on the ridiculousness of your claims in general through the specific, out-of-context example. However, shockingly, it wasn't a very funny joke. Nor is the "citation needed" bullshit. You're acting like an angry teenager who thinks he's the wittiest misunderstood munchkin in his class. If you have a bone to pick, pick it articulately, don't throw off flippant remarks and expect anyone to take them seriously.

As for "I'm not interested in taking one theory and clashing it against another", that is EXACTLY what speculation in this collective medium is. Especially if you're drawing such out-there conclusions as the one you've just posited. If you say stuff like that, you're gonna have to face down opposing theories. I don't know what you think debate is. If you just want to speculate without having to argue your point, go do it by yourself somewhere.

Once again, and this is the last damn time I'm going to explain this: No one is considering the matter of Masky/TTA SOLVED. We have a HYPOTHESIS. Not a CONCLUSION. English, motherfucker, do you speak it?

Other than that, though, I'm done with you. Your argument is incoherent and pointless, and you have shown yourself to be both lazy and completely unable to comprehend when your arguments have been beat.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SticktheFigure
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 549

I'm very afraid of both Dray and JKat now. However, you guys would make a kickass crime fighting team.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Rodion Romanovich
Decorated

Joined: 23 Sep 2010
Posts: 155

My problem with the TTA = Masky = Tim theory is that Tim is seen in Messages. Would TTA really put himself in a video?

I see three options.

1. TTA = Masky = Tim, and he did put his own face in one of his videos, for whatever reason. Maybe he wants Jay to know who he is?

2. TTA = Masky =/= Tim. So what about the jacket? Maybe a coincidence, but I doubt it. Maybe TTA/Masky wants Jay (and us) to suspect Tim?

3. TTA =/= Masky = Tim. Jacket evidence is saved! And what reason do we really have to believe that TTA is Masky? Because Jay says so?

All three are possible, but 3 makes most sense to me. If control is being "taken away" from Jay, maybe it's already been taken away from Tim? In other words, Tim is Masky, but is being controlled by TTA.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
notlupus
Boot


Joined: 07 Mar 2010
Posts: 26

Rodion Romanovich wrote:
My problem with the TTA = Masky = Tim theory is that Tim is seen in Messages. Would TTA really put himself in a video?

I see three options.

1. TTA = Masky = Tim, and he did put his own face in one of his videos, for whatever reason. Maybe he wants Jay to know who he is?

2. TTA = Masky =/= Tim. So what about the jacket? Maybe a coincidence, but I doubt it. Maybe TTA/Masky wants Jay (and us) to suspect Tim?

3. TTA =/= Masky = Tim. Jacket evidence is saved! And what reason do we really have to believe that TTA is Masky? Because Jay says so?

All three are possible, but 3 makes most sense to me. If control is being "taken away" from Jay, maybe it's already been taken away from Tim? In other words, Tim is Masky, but is being controlled by TTA.


I think the reason people believe TTA = Masky = Tim is Addition from totheark where he's mocking Jay, and Entry ##### where he tells Jay that he will take him to the ark. Also, Entry ##### points out that Masky can upload videos, if there was ever an argument about him causing static being a problem.

I don't think Masky is being controlled by anyone but Slenderman, and maybe not even then. I think he was driven mad.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:39 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?


Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 2578
Location: Cowtown, AB

The only reason that if they're all three of them the same person, there'd be a picture of Tim at the end of Messages, it'd probably be because he was saying 'you've been keeping secrets'.... and then, the unspoken part, 'so've I. Here's a hint as an act of good faith.' OR, on the other hand, 'here's a hint so that you can be terrified of even more people now. Very Happy'

PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:42 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
OmegaX
Unfettered


Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Location: Dartmouth, NS, Canada

Dray wrote:
sperg out


Just because MH comes from/was inspired by SomethingAwful, doesn't mean you have to act like you're on SomethingAwful. 'Sperg', coming from 'Aspergers' syndrome', is equal to calling a gay man a fag, a mentally-handicapped person a retard, or a black guy the 'N' word. Aspergers (which, for the record, I don't have, though I was misdiagnosed with it once, turned out to just be social anxiety coupled with a relatively high intelligence and perfectionist streak) is a serious mental health issue, and trivializing it like that sets humanity back decades in terms of common courtesy.
_________________
the last fortress | 17:23:00
I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.


PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:53 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
notlupus
Boot


Joined: 07 Mar 2010
Posts: 26

OmegaX wrote:
Dray wrote:
sperg out


Just because MH comes from/was inspired by SomethingAwful, doesn't mean you have to act like you're on SomethingAwful. 'Sperg', coming from 'Aspergers' syndrome', is equal to calling a gay man a fag, a mentally-handicapped person a retard, or a black guy the 'N' word. Aspergers (which, for the record, I don't have, though I was misdiagnosed with it once, turned out to just be social anxiety coupled with a relatively high intelligence and perfectionist streak) is a serious mental health issue, and trivializing it like that sets humanity back decades in terms of common courtesy.


I don't think Dray meant to offend anyone. Some phrases just become natural, especially in communities like these. I know it's not a good justification. I'm just saying there's certainly a difference between using the term as slang, and malicious intent.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 9:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?


Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 2578
Location: Cowtown, AB

Sorry for offending you -- I had picked it up and had it stuck in my mind since, as you mentioned, it's kind of an embarrassing and demeaning term, and I like to make fun of myself for being so crazy-obsessed with picking apart details. I really didn't mean to use it to offend other people or demean them, just myself...

which looking back on it, is pretty silly and still not a good excuse.

Never the less, consider it purged!

PostPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:53 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Leśniak
Boot

Joined: 05 Dec 2010
Posts: 15

Hello. With regards to "Regards":

The message given is obviously "Look Closely". Since it was in response to #9, I did what any sensible rational person would do and sat staring at the screen like a 'tard for several playthroughs.

First of all, there seems to be something odd going on with the contrast. That could just be due to the lighting conditions, but the level of brightness behind the gazebo at some points is unusual, especially when compared to the people in the foreground.

Secondly, there's an easy-to-miss point which I'd think would be almost too minor if it wasn't for the fact Marble Hornets is being made by film students. Around 0.42, Tim lights up a cigarette. Fair enough. However, he's still smoking after they "resume" shooting.

This is the kind of thing that would make editing footage a nightmare later on, as it would disqualify a lot of takes from being used due to elementary continuity errors.

Jump forward to Entry #20, in which we see that J is actively involved in the project, and even has a specific role: He's the script supervisor. The script supervisor's main job is basically to meticulously note every page of the script and every take shot to ensure that the footage obtained is fit to be edited together for the final product. which means a lot of looking out for elementary continuity errors (such as a magically appearing/disappearing cigarette).

TLDR: The script supervisor's role is vital to the smooth running of a production, and as a result they are very rarely (if ever) off set when shooting takes place.

With all that in mind, where's J in Entry #9? Nobody remarks on his absence, which is unusual given that everyone (especially Alex) is on edge and bickering about how badly things have been going. It looks like not only has J dropped off the earth by this point, but nobody else seems to be aware that he's missing.
[/i]

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:54 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Undertheark
Veteran


Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Posts: 140

Leśniak wrote:

With all that in mind, where's J in Entry #9? Nobody remarks on his absence, which is unusual given that everyone (especially Alex) is on edge and bickering about how badly things have been going. It looks like not only has J dropped off the earth by this point, but nobody else seems to be aware that he's missing.
[/i]


This last paragraph is most interesting to me because its true, not to say the cigerette thing isn't true but I'm classing that in my books as an unintended find.
Jay isn't there for literally a whole Entry to my remembrance, could this mean that somehow season 2 and that Entry share a common de-meaner, that Jay has been gone for a while?

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
awakeasaurusrex
Entrenched


Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Posts: 1099

Undertheark wrote:
This last paragraph is most interesting to me because its true, not to say the cigerette thing isn't true but I'm classing that in my books as an unintended find.
Jay isn't there for literally a whole Entry to my remembrance, could this mean that somehow season 2 and that Entry share a common de-meaner, that Jay has been gone for a while?

I wonder whether the cigarette thing wasn't deliberate on the part of the MH guys - they wanted to get across that Alex and crew are actually pretty bad filmmakers who make rookie mistakes like that. I've always liked the fact that Marble Hornets - as in Alex Kralie's student film - wasn't this great lost work of art ruined by Slendy's meddling but a shitty dime-a-dozen student flick which wouldn't be of any interest if Slendy hadn't shown up.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Undertheark
Veteran


Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Posts: 140

awakeasaurusrex wrote:
Undertheark wrote:
This last paragraph is most interesting to me because its true, not to say the cigerette thing isn't true but I'm classing that in my books as an unintended find.
Jay isn't there for literally a whole Entry to my remembrance, could this mean that somehow season 2 and that Entry share a common de-meaner, that Jay has been gone for a while?

I wonder whether the cigarette thing wasn't deliberate on the part of the MH guys - they wanted to get across that Alex and crew are actually pretty bad filmmakers who make rookie mistakes like that. I've always liked the fact that Marble Hornets - as in Alex Kralie's student film - wasn't this great lost work of art ruined by Slendy's meddling but a shitty dime-a-dozen student flick which wouldn't be of any interest if Slendy hadn't shown up.


Or do you mean a story which would have gotten him a decent grade but in turn it was wrecked by Slendy? Could work both ways. But I mean not to lower MarbleHornets quality but maybe it was an OOG mistake Very Happy Like they literally made the mistake when filming for the ARG and not for the IG filming of MarbleHornets

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:14 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SticktheFigure
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 549

So we're ruling out that the Stigma/Sigma on Tim's shirt could be what we are looking closely for?

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:24 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 19 [284 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ..., 17, 18, 19  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group