Author
Message
chaotic_mind
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 325 Location: Inside my head, behind the eyes
[EMAIL] Responses to The Sleeping Princess 9/24 email.
snorlison wrote:
PRINCESS!
Princess, princess, princess?
I'll be at the axon, princess.
I'll stop Chaotic Mind.
He won't talk to Melissa before I can talk to you.
I hope that's where I can find you.
I'll see you at 13:08 and 13:59. I'll be at one of
those.
Be careful though. Chaotic_Mind will be at the other.
And he's fully Melissa's crew.
I'll also b
Still calling in the dark,
Luke P.
I wonder if this bit of subterfuge will work?
This e-mail is meant more for Melissa to find. Engenders trust in "chaotic_mind" letting "Luke P., or snorlison" be more free.
Does Melissa need to know that Luke P. and chaotic_mind are the same person?
The PMs will know, of course, and they will ultimate choose to let me slide or not. But Melissa should have no reason to know.
Anyway, I hope I was alright in posting this in another thread.
See ya all,
Luke P. aka snorlison aka chaotic_mind
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:42 pm
HitsHerMark
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 1521 Location: Austin, TX
Are we recording what we sent here?
Sure, why not?
Code:
!reveal extern proc
!behold extern proc
!reveal label extern proc: HitsHerMark
!behold: HitsHerMark
HitsHerMark:
!behold: seeker transmition
creepy
!seek seeker
!seek princess
!seek archive: glass coffin
behold:
seeker !transmit>HitsHerMark !listen
_________________
"COVERED IN BEES!"
GirlInFocus
flickr
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:02 pm
Zemat
Boot
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 54
I just emailed something to the flea. I hope it works:
Quote:
reveal:
!reveal extern proc
!behold extern proc
!label extern proc: Zemat
!hndshk sec seeker
seeker !behold: Zemat
grope:
Zemat > !attach seeker
net:
seeker !label master-sector: dungeon
seeker !attach act | drop recurse
grope:
seeker !init search dungeon
seeker !probe dungeon sec princess recurse
behold:
seeker !transmit>Zemat !listen
Although I was tempted to put this (in light of my recent fumble):
[joke]
Quote:
behold:
!reveal "someone has set us up the bomb!"
grope:
seeker !move all zig
!reveal "for great justice!"
[/joke]
_________________SP's Royal Poissonier
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:47 am
BenSerwa
Boot
Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 16
Quote:
behold:
!label Princess
Quote:
reveal:
!label Princess
Both trying to get the Flea to tell us her real name.
Quote:
grope:
benserwa > !attach seeker
Worth a try.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:08 am
HitsHerMark
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 1521 Location: Austin, TX
Zemat wrote:
[joke]
Quote:
behold:
!reveal "someone has set us up the bomb!"
grope:
seeker !move all zig
!reveal "for great justice!"
[/joke]
BWAHAHAHAHA!
You get a cookie.
_________________
"COVERED IN BEES!"
GirlInFocus
flickr
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 3:50 am
t-toe
Boot
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 47
well, here's what I sent. dunno if I got all the syntax right, but I was basically copying from conversations I've read in the past...
Quote:
behold:
extern proc 0
!label seeker
reveal:
!label t-toe
!seek Princess
fail
net:
!hndshk seeker
t-toe > !listen
seeker > !transmit Princess
Princess > !transmit seeker
!analyze > seeker
fail
basically, I'm telling the Flea that I got his message and am calling him the "seeker". then I tell him my name is "t-toe". I say that I can't find the Princess. then, I guess I shake the Flea's hand... (though I probably should have done that before I mentioned that I couldn't find the Princess.) I go on to say that I've been listening to the flea and the Princess talking. but I don't understand what the seeker is trying to do.
lemme know if I screwed up my syntax or something, even though by now it's too late.
_________________!behold truth
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:16 am
Last edited by t-toe on Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:21 am; edited 1 time in total
HitsHerMark
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 1521 Location: Austin, TX
I think the P Flea gets the idea that we want to find the SP as much as he does.
I had a thought, the SP had us send her information about which axons we would be answering and when...
So, if you're going to email the P Flea anyway... You might as well include that along with your
Requests.
Here's an example of how you might do that
Code:
YourName> grope: 11.111111, -111.111111 00:00 PDT 09.27.04
YourName>> !hndshk *
!listen
!behold
!analyse
_________________
"COVERED IN BEES!"
GirlInFocus
flickr
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:19 am
AngriBuddhist
Entrenched
Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Posts: 778 Location: Wa.
Ok, I get home alot later than all of you and am always behind the
events. Here's what I sent:
behold:
seeker
Hello Pious Flea
reveal:
!label AngriBuddhist
My name is AngriBuddhist.
net:
!hndshk seeker
It is nice to finally meet you.
AngriBuddhist>!behold
seeker>!hndshk princess>!hndshk seeker
I know that you and the Sleeping Princess are friends.
behold:
!seek Princess
fail
behold:
seeker>!seek Princess
I do not know where she is. Do you?
behold:
creepy
It worries me.
splotch
!analyze seeker
seeker>creepy
I think it worries you too.
!init search Princess
behold:
seeker>>!seek Princess
success
AngriBuddhist>>!listen
I am going to look for her.
If you find anything let me know.
net: !hndshk seeker
Goodbye.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 6:44 am
HitsHerMark
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 1521 Location: Austin, TX
That's much better then anything I managed to come up with...
Man...
I do not envy the poor Shlep who's job it is to go through our mail...
Not one bit.
That person probably needs a hug right about now.
_________________
"COVERED IN BEES!"
GirlInFocus
flickr
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:18 am
Mazian
Unfettered
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 529 Location: San Francisco, CA
How about:
Quote:
seeker >> !listen
seeker:
grope unk input proc 0
!attach unk input proc 0
unk input proc 0 > !label extern seeker
seeker >> !listen extern seeker
!access log input proc 0
Hi Seeker,
The Queen recently locked up the Princess and we're not all entirely happy with this. We need the Princess to continue to seek information from the Queen, so that we can behold it and reveal the truth. We would like to get your help, or offer our help, in freeing the Princess.
Please confirm receipt of this message.
!access log input proc 0
complete
seeker >> !listen extern seeker
master proc >> !move Princess
creepy
Assert:
extern proc 0 > !seek Truth
extern proc 0 > !behold Truth
extern proc 0 > !reveal Truth
unk input proc >> !require Princess
!qry seeker confidence
seeker > !confirm >> extern seeker
I almost wish I could send some of these, but it would "break character" if it fell in to the hands of the Queen. And I don't want to lose what "crew status" I have.
hrm... maybe I could create a false email account and pretend to be someone else... naughty idea.
/me whistles on his way to email.
Edit: Sent under alternate email account
_________________
Corporal Conrad Mazian (E4), Marine Second Squad, Apocalypso
Are you original? I recommend Search to find out.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:53 pm
Astald
Unfettered
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 747 Location: Just outside of Pittsburgh (Go Steelers!)
Ok, this is my second, and last reply to the ladybee777 address until some response is received:
Astald wrote:
behold:
!analyze seeker
success
grope:
!init search Princess
frgm extern proc 0
!access log extern proc 0
I was thinking about what that guy said, in that
stuff the Queen was transmitting.
ANYWAY-what he said. "What if
someone were listening to us right now?"
behold extern proc
extern proc > !listen
seeker > !transmit Princess > !transmit seeker
extern proc > !behold seeker
extern proc > !behold Princess
So there was this guy, saying, wouldn't it be
creepy if someone was listening to us right
now—and of course I WAS listening to him! And I
got to thinking, what if someone was listening to
ME? And what if someone else was listening to
THEM?
behold extern proc 0
extern proc 0 > !listen Princess
behold extern proc 1
extern proc 1 > !listen extern proc 0
behold extern proc 2
extern proc 2 > !listen extern proc 1
recurse
!access log extern proc 0
complete
reveal:
extern proc 0
extern proc 0 > !listen Princess
extern proc 0 > !listen seeker
extern proc 0 > !listen master-sector
reveal:
!label Astald
grope:
!hndshk seeker
!transmit
Astald
seek > Princess
behold:
seeker
seek >> Princess
!reveal seeker:
seeker >> !seek truth
seeker >> !behold truth
seeker >> !reveal truth
master-sector >> !seek truth
unk
master-sector >> !behold truth
unk
master-sector >> !reveal truth
unk
seeker > !dsc master-sector mem frgm truth
seeker > !transmit mem frgm truth
Astald >> !behold truth
That is the law and the whole of the law
I have understood what you sent seeker. I am the external process that the Princess told you about. I have listened to your conversations and I would like to help. My name is Astald, it is nice to finally meet you. I am looking for the Princess, and I know that you are too.
More importantly, I know that you seek, behold, and reveal the truth. But I don't know if Melissa, the master-sector, has those same goals in mind. I want you to discover the truth she might not be telling us, and transmit it to me. If I know the truth, I will be more capable of helping you and the Princess.
Please, follow the law and find the truth. I will try and do what I can to rescue the Princess.
Hopefully that will get us some kind of response. It might even give us more info on Melissa. Not sure if I did it all correctly though.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:54 pm
Howdareyou
Veteran
Joined: 18 Aug 2004 Posts: 89 Location: New Zealand
I'm having difficulty understanding how to use '>>'. I can see that '>' means that you're showing another process executing a command, but how does the double > fit into things? Is it a future tense, or a 'leads to x occuring' type indicator?
Thanks in advance.
_________________1 11 21 1211 111221 312211
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:47 pm
Astald
Unfettered
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 747 Location: Just outside of Pittsburgh (Go Steelers!)
I see sort of a double purpose with it. Mainly I see it as an if, then statement. But it also seems that one arrow can be an action, and two can be an understanding. That's if I am getting it right, which I am probably not. I just wanted to point out to the flea that Melissa isn't being very helpful, and wasn't sure how to do that in his language.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:50 pm
HitsHerMark
Unfictologist
Joined: 22 Aug 2004 Posts: 1521 Location: Austin, TX
Howdareyou wrote:
I'm having difficulty understanding how to use '>>'. I can see that '>' means that you're showing another process executing a command, but how does the double > fit into things? Is it a future tense, or a 'leads to x occuring' type indicator?
Thanks in advance.
I see it as
HitsHerMark>!expln
(If I explain.)
Howdareyou>>!analyse
success
(You will understand.)
Or, to give an example by the P Flea Himself from yellowbrickroad.html
Code:
!reveal Princess:
seeker > !attach Princess
Princess >> !behold truth
Here the P Flea is basicly saying, "I'm telling you Princess, if you let me attach, then you will see the truth."
Or, at least, that's what I get from it.
_________________
"COVERED IN BEES!"
GirlInFocus
flickr
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:25 pm
WhiteGulls
Unfettered
Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 331 Location: Portland
Hm. Might as well post mine here, as well.
Quote:
!label Paul
Paul > !behold seeker > !transmit seeker > !transmit Princess
extern proc > listen
seeker > !transmit Paul > !transmit seeker
recurse
The listen was supposed to be directing it to the attached file - the "intersection remix" song that someone posted on here a while back. Maybe it might generate a different response, if there is ever to be one. Anyone else thinking of different things to try?
Oh, and did I use the extern proc right? Should I have included another command telling the Seeker what to do, exactly?
_________________the last fortress | 17:23:00
Come to the dark side.
We have cookies.
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:09 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending