Author
Message
RasGold
Unfettered
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 Posts: 354 Location: Austin, TX, U.S.A.
NASA Finds Alien DNA in Californian Lake FYI
Nice timing?
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Alien-DNA-NASA-Mono-Lake-Bacteria,news-9183.html#xtor=RSS-998
Quote:
The possibility of life outside this tiny, little planet we call home is now much more likely ...
_________________CMDR: Ras ™
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:11 pm
gramma
Decorated
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 171 Location: germany - nearby frankfurt
what do you mean regarding the timing?
it was just a hype about halomonadaceae bacterium that was known in theory to be able to exchange one of the classic six elements
now they where able to proof it and made a press conference
pls tag this as offtopic for our "guest-trolls".....thx
_________________
live for nothing... die for something - john rambo
follow me on ||||| Twitter |||||
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:54 pm
Xeno Lambrose
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 668
Alien(?) life Hey Ras,
Good to hear from you; thought you'd dropped off the radar and vanished.
Nasa, which is hurting for $s makes this statement, alluding to alien life, but is it really? It's just one of many, many things that scientists have discovered that they did not know before, and that's never happened before.
Look at all of the theories that have been revised or thrown out entirely in the past and up to the present.
National Geographic has presented many awesome documentaries on numerous subjects, and I recall how over-awed scientists were when they discovered the deep-dwelling tube worms living adjacent to volcanic plumes under the ocean, and the remarkable process by which they were able to live.
Each year there are so many "new" species discovered, but they're really not new...they just hadn't been found before by scientists.
Why, in the early part of the last century the concensus among scientists was that a particular aquatic creature was extinct. That was proved wrong in 1938! The name of the particular fish slips my mind (and I hate when my mind starts slipping--better than sliding, I suppose), but it just shows to go you that science is not static, and whether one believes in intelligent design, or feels that one of their ancestors was cousin to Sasquatch, our planet is teeming with enough life forms to keep scientists busy for the rest of their lives.
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:27 pm
simplicityjones
Decorated
Joined: 01 Oct 2010 Posts: 207 Location: Florida Gulf Coast
New Species Since we are getting theoretical, what construes a new species? If a scientist had not cataloged it and put it in a jar before then it is new. But we have proven that like the dinosaurs yes new species do appear. And keeping with Darwinism species adapt to their environment, ex: marine iguanas, Geckos and chameleons. So yes there is a possibility that there are new species being made everyday. Who says evolutionary changed species cannot be born today? Maybe that two headed snake knows something we don't? Or maybe he needs both of those heads to see what's coming so he doesn't get run over by that car.
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Xeno Lambrose
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 668
and just to be safe, our two-headed snake should evolve rearview mirrors so that it knows he/she/they should pull over for the hemi-under the shell tortoise with the flashing light bar on top who's going to pull the snake over for not signaling properly while passing a horned toad on the wrong side of the road...
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:13 am
multipsychoapopheniosis
Unfettered
Joined: 22 May 2010 Posts: 325
Re: New Species
simplicityjones wrote:
.... So yes there is a possibility that there are new species being made everyday. Who says evolutionary changed species cannot be born today....
Enter Zanthrustra stage left
Whatever your opinion regarding motives, it is very cool. The ability of GFAJ-1 to utilise arsenic instead of phosphorus on our planet basically rewrites our "rules of life". Certainly Astrobiologists and Chemists have speculated that this should be possibe, proving it is a much bigger deal (like retrocausality-Theoretically cool but if practically proven then fundamentally awesome and rule changing (twiddles thumbs waiting for Cramer )!). Combine this with the recent study showing over three times the number of red giants out there (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature09578.html) then not only are we unlikely to be alone, the universe is almost certainly teeming with life.
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:19 am
kosmopol
I Never Tire of My Own Voice
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Posts: 3167
Yeah, for me personally this is a revolutionary event.
Even if discovery was made earlier, but: now even the last doubting professor has to admit that our contemporary view of life (at least as a biological process) is soo 1900ies.
I am sure (and I always was), our universe is full of life. Just the so-to-called "healthy" scepticism in the science was always the hugest brake of our development. Now even the traditionalists see: we know too few things to decline things. Because this scientifical scepticism was surely a protection against wildest speculations, but: it gone the wrong way
Code:
scepticism=>this thing does not fit into modern theories=>there is no such thing=>everybody researching this thing is a charlatan
And since people are infected by vanity, nobody want to be called a charlatan, so they stood away from relovutionary but not traditional science.
Now we see: this so called traditional science is a Comedy of Errors.
That's why this event is very significant for me.
_________________
kosmopol Merzmensch : http://merzmensch.blogspot.com
Speaks German/Russian/Japanese
Leonard Nimoy calls me by nickname: http://tinyurl.com/gvuvydr
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:08 am
RasGold
Unfettered
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 Posts: 354 Location: Austin, TX, U.S.A.
gramma wrote:
pls tag this as offtopic for our "guest-trolls".....thx
Sorry ... Nope.
I find the subject "On Topic" and the timing is relative to our little viral story here.
a) Area 51 is the only known connection between Super 8 and alien presence.
b) So far, the conversation has been intellectual and enlightening.
c) I take a "Hardee-Har-Har" view on life. And, any entertainment I can provide within the guidelines of the forum Mods is well respected.
If I was to post something drastic, it would be:
"J.J. Announces 'Super 8' Is, In Fact, Prequel To Cloverfield!"
Ask anyone who remembers me from the Cloverfield Viral days.
While I post a lot of outlandish sh!t, I weed out the random crap and systematically denounce "fake" from fiction.
As I see it, here on UnFiction, the "Guest Trolls" have been posting pertinent information regarding this game; which I find unfair. I have requested no guest posting ... but it continues. Either this game is too far fetched (too hard--it's like clicking the "hint" button when we get stuck in a puzzle too soon), or the game is not fully structured.
Soooooo ... An Alien organism has been found on Earth.
I'm very excited!!!
Beats the Hell out of the Global Warming/2012 fanatics!
...
_________________CMDR: Ras ™
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:11 am
catherwood
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee
Joined: 25 Sep 2002 Posts: 4109 Location: Silicon Valley, CA
RasGold wrote:
I find the subject "On Topic" and the timing is relative to our little viral story here.
Think of the tag as being whether or not the thread is related to in-game content for the ARG (assuming there is one here). Whether or not a subject is "on topic" isn't the issue, but whether or not it is "In Game" or "Out Of Game".
Because NASA did not hold a press release for the purposes of furthering a viral marketing campaign for an upcoming movie, this thread should be tagged [OOG].
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:34 am
gramma
Decorated
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 171 Location: germany - nearby frankfurt
catherwood wrote:
RasGold wrote:
I find the subject "On Topic" and the timing is relative to our little viral story here.
Think of the tag as being whether or not the thread is related to in-game content for the ARG (assuming there is one here). Whether or not a subject is "on topic" isn't the issue, but whether or not it is "In Game" or "Out Of Game".
Because NASA did not hold a press release for the purposes of furthering a viral marketing campaign for an upcoming movie, this thread should be tagged [OOG].
you found the better words for it
cheers
_________________
live for nothing... die for something - john rambo
follow me on ||||| Twitter |||||
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:13 pm
kosmopol
I Never Tire of My Own Voice
Joined: 27 Aug 2007 Posts: 3167
Yes Ras, seriously.
NASA is not in such desperated financial situation to make adverts for Hollywood.
It's fully OOG. Or, say, the Roswell alien was a very early viral marketing campaign for JJ Abrams movie "Super 8". JJ Abrams was pretty young these days, to be correctly: -19 years .
_________________
kosmopol Merzmensch : http://merzmensch.blogspot.com
Speaks German/Russian/Japanese
Leonard Nimoy calls me by nickname: http://tinyurl.com/gvuvydr
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:03 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending