Author
Message
Zevin_Mars
Boot
Joined: 14 Feb 2011 Posts: 17
[Spec] Was Jessica even real? What if Jessica was just a hallucination/construct by Slendy to try and trap J? I mean, that might explain why his camera camera went all distoriony when she was around since this would essentially mean that Jess was an aspect of Slendy.
Also, it might explain where she went too.
I've always been in love with this idea, but most people seem to follow the "they met during the seven month break" idea, which is fair enough (and probably more likely too... )
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:02 am
Snowalker
Greenhorn
Joined: 09 Feb 2011 Posts: 9
I hate to say it, because this theory sounds nice, but she did pick one of Jay's grocery bags. Hallucinations don't typically do that..
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:46 am
theonewhoquestions
Unfettered
Joined: 11 Mar 2010 Posts: 377
Snowalker wrote:
I hate to say it, because this theory sounds nice, but she did pick one of Jay's grocery bags. Hallucinations don't typically do that..
Unless she was a glamored someone. I still don't subscribe to this theory though.
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:02 am
bobthecrusher
Unfettered
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 444 Location: Sitting on your window
we saw her on camera, that, by definition, negates the possibility of a hallucination. I think it's more likely she just got scared and ran
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:28 am
wheeler
Veteran
Joined: 11 Feb 2011 Posts: 98
this theory is nice
but, as the person above me stated, we saw her on camera...a hallucination wouldn't be seen by us on the camera, it would only be seen by J.
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:36 am
JKatkina
Entrenched
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 825 Location: Calgary, AB
Why did this need its own thread?
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:47 am
Cutboy
Decorated
Joined: 10 Jan 2011 Posts: 191
wat.
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:12 pm
Pestilence
Boot
Joined: 02 Feb 2011 Posts: 11
Is J even real? Is anything even real? Am I real? lol i could go on for a while.
but on topic, I think she was real. immediately I see the problem of things reacting to her touch. A hallucination or anything really wouldn't do that. Noe this could lead into "well what If she's not lucid" or "what if she's being controlled" those however would be different theories so I'm gunna stick to a hallucination or more specifically an operator induced illusion. Well we've seen, like in entry 17, that he does have the power to make illusions, (in 17 he doesn't let anyone see him.) although the camera does pick it up which may mean that he can't control cameras although we do not know for sure how far his power goes.
In short yeah, the operator so ambiguous that he very well may be able to do that, but at the moment most signs point to no.
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:53 pm
c.r.e.a.m.
Boot
Joined: 05 Dec 2010 Posts: 29
is this real life?[/img]
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:20 pm
awakeasaurusrex
Entrenched
Joined: 12 Oct 2010 Posts: 1099
Is this just fantasy?
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:34 am
Dray
Pretty talky there aintcha, Talky?
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 2578 Location: Cowtown, AB
Hmm, there really is no escape from reality for Jay.
Maybe he's trapped in a Bohemian Rhapsody.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:11 am
Leśniak
Boot
Joined: 05 Dec 2010 Posts: 15
The recurring theme with illusions seems to be that they don't fool cameras. Cases in point:
0. The visual tear seems to occur whenever the Operator arrives in the location. It doesn't seem to happen when he's already there.
1. Entry #5. We never see anything of the Operator, but the camera seems to pick up his presence (and the distortion gets worse whenever something connected to fire or water is mentioned).
2. Entry #12. The entire cast sees the Operator standing and watching them while on set. None of them seem to notice that he's 12 feet tall and doesn't have a face, but the recording clearly shows this.
3. Entry #17. Nobody notices that the Operator is clearly visible outside the window, but the camera shows him, and reacts when he's provoked (possibly by Tim drinking the water).
There's a couple of other possible examples, particularly in Entry #2, where Alex says he saw a "really tall guy", but doesn't seem to have noticed anything unusual about him beyond his effect on the dog.
The camera shows Jessica at all times, with only incidental distortion at key points when she speaks or does certain things, which is more likely to be related to the proximity of/ the disturbance of the Operator. Based on this, it's highly unlikely she's an illusion.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:15 pm
jackofnotrades
Unfettered
Joined: 06 Nov 2010 Posts: 330
She's actually CGI, just dont really well. In scenes where she interacts with objects (groceries, doors, phones) they use a muppet-like model and touch it up in post.
Edit: Really its just a testament to how much the guys have improved and the level of care and effort put in, compared to entry #18 and #23, when the part of Jessica was clearly just a small white doll
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:54 pm
thehatter
Veteran
Joined: 16 Feb 2011 Posts: 92 Location: Wonderland
jessica and the doll are related??? i'm so lost...
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:09 am
Leftylol
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Feb 2011 Posts: 4
thehatter wrote:
jessica and the doll are related??? i'm so lost...
He was making a joke
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:46 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending