unforum

[zombiehammer]

Darren's Timeless Memories (Paranormal Activity 3)

[zombiehammer]

Oh, and emailing darrenSPLATdarrenstimelessmemories.com gives you the following response.

[iRobotZombie]

Nice one

Something is bothering about "Incode" -- that's a teller right there, its an incorrect word. He even says it in the video.

You Encode videos, you don't Incode them.

[Greystone]

I agree
iRobotZombie

[Gimme20dollaz]

Oh god, not ANOTHER Paranormal Activity...2 movies were enough.
Actually, now that I think of it, 1 was enough.

[100kfireflies]

I love this movie franchise. I really liked the second one and #3 looks interesting. Darren is funny as hell, I'm in!

[RandomGuy26]

First thing I noticed was the end of the commercial video.

[nextgenadult]

hey maby this new movie will be a whole new story, its gonna take the route that the halloween franchise was originally supposed to take

[100kfireflies]

I don't know if this means anything, but in his video when he describes the services:

Treat your video
Optimize the data

Beautify the resolution
Incode for eternity

It could be an acrostic for TOBI. Maybe a name of someone? I wanna say it sounds familiar, but the name does not come up in any of the film synopses, so maybe I am leaping to a false conclusion.

Also, there is what seems to be a large space in between the 2nd and 3rd line of that list when you watch it. It could be done because it is an amateur video or maybe it is two words??? TO BI?????

No idea. Maybe this is nothing.

[nextgenadult]

just emailed him. im getting on this before it takes off.

[nextgenadult]

[100kfireflies]

Also in the Amy E. video, that part where it looks like there is wedding footage spliced in....I'm not sure it is a wedding. If you look closely it looks like what appears to be a little girl in a white dress upfront with her back to the camera....to the right of the woman standing. It definitely looks like they are at a church of some kind. Maybe a communion??? If may not be a woman, it could be a priest in robes.


ETA: I also emailed, got the auto-responder and then replied asking for more details about pricing and services.

[100kfireflies]

Amy E. video

[stugots]

yeah, those breaks in the videos are screaming creepy clue

[100kfireflies]

I am convinced that there is something to that image. At first I thought it was the camera flash, but I ruled it out for several reasons:

1. If you look at the background behind the baby there is like a cubby thing piece of furniture there and what looks to me to be a chair with a red and black checked coat or shirt draped over it. So there is only part of the white shelving visible.

2. There are two flashes. The first one is a really quick, what I believe to be the photo flash. You can see the furniture behind the baby and the coat. The second "flash" seems bigger and brighter and you can't see the background furniture or the coat. There is a form/shape that blocks them from view. It's what I think is a doorway and wall or front of a house or something. You can even kind of see it on the baby.

3. I thought that maybe it was just two flashes from the camera, you know how some cameras have the short warning flash, and then the real one......but as my man pointed out, most cameras didn't do that during that time period.

ETA:
4. If you look at it and see the 4 corners of the image, the upper left corner is visible on the baby's face, actually a large portion of the upper left quadrant is on the baby. With a visible white line across the baby's arm.

So I am back to thinking that it is something. At least until proven wrong.