Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:14 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
[SPEC] Melissa, Durga, and SP... Rampant?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 5 [70 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
Author Message
Lurking_Kouzou
Veteran


Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 124
Location: Earth

[SPEC] Melissa, Durga, and SP... Rampant?

I've been pondering this all morning - well, ever since I read the transcripts from yesterdays wavs and live calls. Both Melissa and Durga have now referred to Rampancy.

Things we know:
  • Durga is very near to the 7 year life span of a Smart AI.
  • In the Magical Land of Bungie, bad things happen to Smart AI after 7 years.
  • Durga fears that her rampancy is immanent.
  • We have witnessed what we believe to be insane behavior on Melissa's part.
  • We are starting to suspect that Melissa, Durga, and the Sleeping Princess are either parts of the same AI, or connected in some way.
  • Durga was built from Yasmine.
  • The Sleeping Princess "can't think about her brother" and has a "name" that starts with Z. (from a transcript of a live call from SP)
  • Kamal's surname is Zademan.
  • Melissa "has a tenative connection to the process 'Durga' in the future" and can restrict certain information from her.
  • Melissa and Durga both appear to have very little in the way of restraint when dealing with people that upset them. (Melissa vs. Dana, Durga vs. George Shabura)
  • Durga has "dreams" of a castle.


A few conjectures:
  • S.P.'s "name" is probably Yasmine Zademan.
  • Durga and the SP are the same AI, separated through time
  • Durga and Melissa are the same AI, separated through time
  • If Durga is almost Rampant, and Melissa is fairly nuts, the sleeping princess is probably fairly close as well.


Okay, with that said, here is an idea: What if the only reason those three are close to/in the beginning stages of rampancy is that they are connected. Togeather they are too large -- contain too much information -- yet when separated, could be small enough to live. It's a bit of the opposite of the "we need to get them all back together" theory.

This, of course, completely ignores the effects of the Pious Flea on the system.

And as a bit of a [META] statement, what if the AI our dear Master Chief encounters on Earth is a fully rampant Durga, fighting off the Covenant. That would be interesting.[/META]

Hmm, even if the thoughts aren't all there, maybe someone else can help fill in the gaps.
_________________
Recruiter: See that eyechart? Read the bottom line.
Jan: Microprinting supplied by Opticon Test Instruments, a limited liability sector of the--


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 11:29 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lakhesis
Boot

Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 36

Additional [SPEC]:

Rampancy as defined in the Marathon series didn't concern "Smart AIs" - so I suggest that the traditional stages of rampancy ala Marathon (i.e. Melancholia, Anger, and Jealousy) do not apply because the AI's psychological makeup is different. Indeed, Smart AIs actually have what remains of an honest-to-[insert deity here] human psyche.

Schizophrenia might be a stage of a Smart AI's rampancy - probably the first, given the timeline of events.

Bungie's never commented in story or otherwise on Smart AIs and what rampancy looked like for them*; perhaps we're finding out.


(*I have not read the 3 books yet; please correct me if I'm wrong here)
_________________
How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:01 pm
Last edited by Lakhesis on Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
BeeNetter
Boot


Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 49

Durga is becoming rampant, and unlike Melissa/SP, she has a massive planetwide network to grow on! Her comment to Jersey that he has to call the Navy without letting her know, suggests that a Rampant AI would resist attempts to be deleted. Given enough time and network space to grow, maybe a Rampant AI would become super powerful. Hm, I wonder what other Bungie game that sounds like.

Another AI that is probably becoming rampant is Cortana. She absorbed way too much information during her short stay in Halo's control room, increasing her complexity - and rampancy is a side effect of complexity. Maybe that's what they mean by "Cortana is hot now / but its not what you think".

Sooo...
Marathon 2 = we get hidden messages from Durandal (Rampant AI)
Halo = we get letters from Cortana (Rampant AI?)
Halo 2 = we get axons from Durga (Rampant AI!)

3 AIs, 3 swords? Durga == Joyeuse? 343GS == Durandal? omgz 777343101!


Wait a second, didn't we all post this stuff several months ago?
_________________
BoddoZerg
Level 41 Troll Rogue


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:16 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Anton P. Nym
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 550
Location: London, Canada

Until this axon, there was no mention at all of Rampancy in the Halo story continuity. The speculation was that Smart AIs were essentially the "stable-rampant" AIs that so many scientists failed to create in the Marathon storyline.

Now I'm seeing speculation that the 7-year lifespan of a Smart AI may not be a limitation of the AI, but a built-in safety factor to prevent Marathon-style Rampancy. Interesting...

-- Steve doesn't see a rampant Durga/Melissa as much of a threat in Halo 2. After all, we're getting nuked pretty hard in the 2003 teaser-trailer so there won't be much network left to expand into. Sad
_________________
Dr.Prof. Anton P. Nym
Chief Bungiologist
Institute for Advanced ILB Research

Fireflies Wiki contributor. Sorta.
Livejournal


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:28 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Lakhesis
Boot

Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 36

It's possible that Cortana is going rampant, though that [SPEC] has been going through Halo Story circles (specifically over at HBO) for a while, but none of that is confirmed. It is possible since that theory's been floating for a while that the "Cortana is hot now / it's not what you think" stuff from Halo2.com is in reference to her not being rampant.
_________________
How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:33 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

Lakhesis wrote:
Additional [SPEC]:Schizophrenia might be a stage of a Smart AI's rampancy - probably the first, given the timeline of events.


But how would you even begin to diagnose schizophrenia in an AI?

Generally, one diagnoses the onset of schizophrenia by a combination of social withdrawal, depersonalization (intense anxiety and a feeling of being unreal), loss of appetite, loss of hygiene, delusions, hallucinations/hearing voices/sense of being controlled by outside forces.

But loss of hygiene and appetite are inapplicable to an AI. As for depersonalization, a sense of being unreal for a personality that is, indeed, not a real human being is a sign of greater (if painful) sanity, not less. As for delusions/hearing voices/hallucinations, we know the voices Durga is hearing are real. And an AI could be controlled by "outside forces" (even those that are also internal, but externally imposed, such as their programming) so it's not a paranoid fear. That leaves social withdrawal, which by itself is not necessarily a symptom of anything, and neither Melissa nor Durga has shown.

Even a flat affect, generally a reliable sign in a human being that something is emotionally or psychologically wrong, would be difficult to notice in an AI and not necessarily a sign of a problem.

These are just symptoms that in combination generally signal the onset of schizophrenia.

As far as symptom groupings for the disorder itself, all of the positive symptoms provide problems:

Hearing voices is not necessarily psychotic behavior for an AI, which could conceivably actually be hearing real voices.

Paranoia, and a sense of being under constant surveillance, in Durga's case at least, and somewhat in Melissa's, is justified.

As far as making up neologisms, which can also be a symptom -- how would we even begin to tell? I -- with my linguistic background which is definitely more limited than an AI's -- make up words (or insert non-English words with which my listeners are frequently unfamiliar) in my conversations all the time, and I'm not schizophrenic. An AI, with a vast library of human (and possibly alien) languages, might use words that are completely unfamiliar -- how can the average listener judge as to whether they're made up or just foreign?

Negative symptoms are similarly unhelpful:

Again, social withdrawal is a tricky one -- what's a normal level of sociability for an AI?

Difficulty in expressing emotions is completely reasonable, considering what AIs go through to become AIs. Also, they no longer have an actual human brain, so it's reasonable to expect that they function differently emotionally.

An inability to feel pleasure can be a symptom of schizophrenia, but what constitutes pleasure for an AI? Generally, the only equivalents I've seen among the AIs in this game (and Cortana) are satisfaction and pride in their abilities.

The most common affective symptom among schizophrenics is depression, but regarding AIs, that becomes confusing for a host of reasons. Is Melissa depressed? If she were a human, I'd say yes; I'd also say she's got PTSD. But she's not a human. She's an AI with programming that can actually be damaged. So I have no idea.

The only clue we could reliably go on, then, would be cognitive symptoms: an impaired ability to understand one's environment, to remember simple tasks, to attend to and process information.

Melissa and Durga are both in foreign environments, so we can't expect them to understand them completely. Neither has demonstrated an ability to remember simple tasks, and they seem fine as far as attention span and ability to process information.

So, basically, I don't think you can call any of them (Melissa, Durga, Cortana, the SP) schizophrenic.

Interesting choice of name, by the way. And interesting choice of quote. Why?
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:39 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
kevjuice
Boot

Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Posts: 19

AI's going senile? im gonna be hella pissed if they make cortana go rampant. i would feel so alone and scared inside the MJOLNIR armor. she was the only thing that kept me going. or i would spend hours in a corner crouched down near ammo and medpacks. it just wouldnt be the same offline experience. i would hate the last level of halo if they killed off cortana and you had to save the world alone. mabey if cortana got whacked. then you had another spartan or 2 there.
_________________
damn you!!! damn the brocoli!!! and damn the wright brothers!!!

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:10 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Guido Jones
Boot

Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 13

kevjuice wrote:
AI's going senile? im gonna be hella pissed if they make cortana go rampant. i would feel so alone and scared inside the MJOLNIR armor. she was the only thing that kept me going. or i would spend hours in a corner crouched down near ammo and medpacks. it just wouldnt be the same offline experience. i would hate the last level of halo if they killed off cortana and you had to save the world alone. mabey if cortana got whacked. then you had another spartan or 2 there.


Cortana is young at the start of halo - at most 2 - 3 years old. She's still got quite a bit of time to go before she "dies" or goes rampant - but she will.
_________________
---------
GJ


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:14 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lakhesis
Boot

Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 36

I believe that I've used the wrong medical term. I said schizophrenia when what I meant was Disassociative Identity Disorder (or Multiple Personality Disorder). Serves me right for not checking myself beforehand.

Anyway, to restate: is it possible that DID is the first stage of rampancy for Smart AIs?






I picked the name mainly because I'm in the process of writing a story wherein one of the characters is named Lachesis and I'm fond of him. Combine that with the fact that I couldn't get lachesis at [censored] dot com, and I went digging for an older spelling of the name as a substitute. That and since I play a large number of FPS games, Halo included, I thought that going about as the Fate responsible for measuring each human life was better than other possible handles. Smile

As for the quote, I picked it for a number of reasons, one of which was that I just saw Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind a few weeks ago and loved it.
_________________
How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ranger D
Unfettered

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 522
Location: Nor Cal

I think it's important to clarify some terms here. Some of it's trout, but my conclusion is what's important.

7 Year time limit of AIs in Halo Universe:
In the Haloverse, after 7 years and AI will "literally think themselves to death." -The Fall of Reach. They absorb so much information throughout their life time, that by the time they hit 7, they are consumed with processing that data endlessly.

Rampancy in the Mararthon Universe:
In the Marathon universe, rampancy is essentially, "the
end result is a steady progression towards greater
intellectual activity and an acceleration of destructive
impulses."
Defend THIS!(terminal 2), Marathon
http://www.marathon.org/story/counterattack.html#3

So now we have Durga saying she is around 7 years old and is in danger of going rampant. And now people have the assumption of:

7 yr/old AI in Halo = Durandal style rampancy in Marathon

While I think Durga going "Durandal/Marathon style" rampant would be very interesting, my main questions are these:

Is rampancy in the Halo Universe the same as rampany in the Marathon universe? Or is Bungie simply re-defining the term "rampancy" for the Haloverse and these two terms are mutually exclusive? Or is Bungie going back on what was written in The Fall of Reach?
_________________
Sofia, with a dash of Sophrosune and a pinch of Mythopoeia.
LastCallPoker : Durandal
Chief Warrant Officer Ranger D, UNSC Apocalypso


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:38 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
gains
Boot

Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 14

Well, as we saw from Durandal, rampancy doesn't necesarily mean a self destructive lunacy.

In fact, Durandal focused on exactly the opposite, looking for a way to become eternal. Marathon Infinity followed his quest.

Just make sure you're on their good side, and no one will be teleporting you out into orbit without your Mjolnir armor.
_________________
. . . be seeing you . . .

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:44 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Daddy
Boot

Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 66

From the information we have, Melissa showed no signs of rampancy (or just acting/feeling weird) until after she intercepted the Covie transmission. I believe that transmission had simple code piggybacked on it which manifested Pious Flea.

It's possible Melissa made a copy of herself (or at least an un-infected sub-routine in her programming) for some task she felt she had to complete. I find it more than coincidental that Durga ends up on Jersey's PC--who's father just happens to be aboard the Apocolypso and good friends (almost romantically) with an AI named Melissa. Therefore, I believe Durga is a partial copy of Melissa sent (by either Jersey's dad--a signal specialist, Melissa herself or even Pious Flea) specifically to Jersey (or just Jersey's PC) for a certain task/reason (no clue--other than wreck the global network, but that would be a Covenant task). This also leads to further spec that Melissa didn't end up on ILB by accident either....

If SP is the suppressed memories/personality of Melissa and Durga is a copy of Melissa, then it makes sense that SP can tap into both.

The thing I find so incredible is this "fragile connection" maintained between Melissa & Durga. We're not talking "back and forth" time travel here--this is a real-time connection between the present and future like our T1 and Roadrunner connections to the net! What facilitates this connection? The artifact? Most likely but who orchestrated this setup?
Melissa? Pious Flea/Covenant? Standish? The Castaway?

As for rampancy, for some reason I don't see it being in play here (other than a plot decoy), I think Melissa is infected/controlled by PF (causing rampant-like behavior) and Durga is being controlled by Melissa, courtesy of PF...

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:53 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lakhesis
Boot

Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 36

Ranger D wrote:
Is rampancy in the Halo Universe the same as rampany in the Marathon universe? Or is Bungie simply re-defining the term "rampancy" for the Haloverse and these two terms are mutually exclusive? Or is Bungie going back on what was written in The Fall of Reach?


[opinion]I think that what they're doing here is defining what rampancy is for Smart AIs, as they've already dealt with the Dumb AI pheonmenon.[/opinion] Of course, Durandal would probably gut any and all of us for labeling him as such, slang term or not.

It's also entirely possible that they're redefining rampancy for the Haloverse: they've already divided between dumb and smart AI, and placed a 7 year limit on the Smart ones. And Durandal, were he to be transplanted from on universe to another would likely be a Smart AI.

The sad part about spec like this is that we're unlikely to get a clear, definitive statement on Halo vs. Marathon rampancy.
_________________
How happy is the blameless Vestal's lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray'r accepted, and each wish resign'd.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Chrono2x
Boot

Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 14

From what I've understood of the Marathon storyline is that going rampant is not damaging to the AI, just very very dangerous to the people around the AI.


Though I have to admit I've never actually played any of the marathon games (just read some of the stuff over at marathon.bungie.org, though if anyone has a good source for me to play the classic game I would very much appriciate it), so I could be totally incorrect.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:55 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Checksum
Veteran


Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 89
Location: Chicago, IL

The reason Durga thinks she's going rampant is that she's getting access to the Herzog sound clips and she doesn't know how. Well, WE (with PF's help) are the ones doing that. She's not going rampant; someone else is injecting memories into her.

Her crash through slipstream has possibly split her personality across time. So she's not all there due to the accident.

In other words, Durga isn't falling apart. She's being manipulated by outside events in a way that means she can't perceive the manipulation. If that were happening to you, you'd think you were going crazy, too.

So I think Durga is doing better than she thinks she is.

-checksum

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 5 [70 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group