Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:53 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
[VIDEO] Isolation
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 12 of 16 [236 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
Jingleman
Decorated

Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 239
Location: Texas

But distortion and teleportation (if that stuff is teleportation) are associated with Operator victims (like Jessica) just as often as apparent Operator allies (like Alex). They only indicate a connection to the Operator, which is something everybody in the series has, one way or another. Even if TTA or his minions (like Masky in 19), are capable of teleporting at will, why does that mean that they work with the Operator? Regardless of what side he's on, TTA has always seemed to know more than anybody else about the supernatural stuff.

Granted, I think that "Return" is some of the strongest evidence that TTA works with the Operator, or at least, that he's cool with being in the same hallway with TO. On the other hand, what do you do with 45, where Hoody and Masky attack Alex (TO's apparent minion) and something (probably the Operator) scares them away?

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:26 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DaturaStramonium
Veteran


Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 107

Jingleman wrote:
But distortion and teleportation (if that stuff is teleportation) are associated with Operator victims (like Jessica) just as often as apparent Operator allies (like Alex). They only indicate a connection to the Operator, which is something everybody in the series has, one way or another. Even if TTA, or his minions (like Masky in 19), are capable of teleporting at will, why does that mean that they work with the Operator? Regardless of what side he's on, TTA has always seemed to know more than anybody else about the supernatural stuff.

Granted, I think that "Return" is some of the strongest evidence that TTA works with the Operator, or at least, that he's cool with being in the same hallway with TO. On the other hand, what do you do with 45, where Hoody and Masky attack Alex (TO's apparent minion) and something (probably the Operator) scares them away?


But remember, Return does not have to be TTA's personally held, filmed and constructed footage. It may have been on a tripod in some place that TTA knew Jay would end up, and for all we know it could be stolen footage from Jay (this is taking it a bit far, though) . Although there is no evidence to back any of this up, any alternative origins of the footage, in contrast to TTA actually standing there and filming it, are supported by the strong somewhat consensus on TTA being an Operator victim now fighting against it.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:37 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Stanislav
Decorated


Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 205
Location: Washington the State

Nah, no tripod could do the camerawork in Return on its own. All that panning, and the two separate shots in the scene. I'm betting that TTA is anti-Operator, but the Operator doesn't chase him off or anything, except in cases like #45 where the two were directly harming and threatening Alex.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:44 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
DaturaStramonium
Veteran


Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 107

Stanislav wrote:
Nah, no tripod could do the camerawork in Return on its own. All that panning, and the two separate shots in the scene. I'm betting that TTA is anti-Operator, but the Operator doesn't chase him off or anything, except in cases like #45 where the two were directly harming and threatening Alex.


Ah damn, I forget about the multiple shots. I guess I should have watched it again.

Return has always been a mystery to me, and I always sort of wished it was never made because of the plot implications it has had, even back then.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Jingleman
Decorated

Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 239
Location: Texas

I like to think that in "Return," Hoody or a minion of his like Masky was there with Jay already, either having brought him to that place or having followed him there. Then, he senses (hears, sees, whatever) the Operator coming, and starts backing away from Jay. Around the corner comes the Operator, and the cameraman hangs in there for a moment or two, then the clip cuts off as he gets the heck out of Dodge, a la "Entry #45."

At least, that's how I rationalize the the video, but I'm not sure that I can come up with a satisfactory interpretation of "found you/forever." Still, I think that the rest of the series implies that TTA opposes TO, including "Isolation."

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:22 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

Quote:
Even if TTA or his minions (like Masky in 19), are capable of teleporting at will, why does that mean that they work with the Operator?


It doesn't, necessarily, that is why I use the term "imply." That said, Totheark has to have gained this teleportation power, or knowledge of how to exploit it, from somewhere. Occam's Razor would suggest that is The Operator, & in turn, this would suggest that they formed some kind of an alliance.

Quote:
On the other hand, what do you do with 45, where Hoody and Masky attack Alex (TO's apparent minion) and something (probably the Operator) scares them away?


It wasn't necessarily The Operator. Of course, Occam's Razor suggests that it was, but it could really be any person or thing that the duo thought could mess them up.

I'm just saying that Totheark's allegiance really isn't all that clear.

I do retract the point about the distortion, though.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:40 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Jingleman
Decorated

Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 239
Location: Texas

Of course it's possible that if TTA has knowledge of the supernatural that allows him to wield power like teleportation or electronic distortion or an otherworldly level of crypticism, then he got it through an alliance with the Operator. It's possible.

However, I think that there's a simpler theory: that TTA knows so much because he has been dealing with the Operator for the longest time, and has continued to survive against all odds. Maybe he's a survivor of a previous climactic battle, or he's been stalked since childhood and rather than blocking it out like Tim, he's been accumulating experience and knowledge along the way.

The reason I think this is simpler is that the alternative requires some sort of communication with the Operator, and I think that implies a level of comprehension of an eldrich horror that we've not seen in the entries. If no such alliance took place, then the only requirement is that TTA is very intelligent or clever, or that his exposure has left him with some kind of supernatural sixth sense. That is, if his knowledge doesn't require the active participation or consent of the Operator, then that's simpler.

I suppose it illustrates how Occam's Razor is a less-than-ideal tool in the humanities. It's designed to guide us when we have to choose between a complicated theory and a simple one, all else being equal. In the humanities especially, the definition of "simple" is up for debate. What's the measure of "simplicity" in fiction? Is it the fewest number of moving parts or steps in a plot? The involvement of the fewest characters? Is it the degree of correlation to real life? The fulfillment of foreshadowing? The most in line with established character traits? Requiring the fewest logical inferences from the audience? Even in the hard sciences, it can be difficult to establish standards for simplicity or efficiency. In the humanities it's well-nigh impossible.

You're quite right in that we should make as few assumptions as possible, but I'm just not sure Occam's Razor itself is very helpful here.

Finally, we're very much in agreement that TTA's motives are completely mysterious. I think he generally opposes the Operator, but otherwise I've got nothing.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:23 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

Quote:
That is, if his knowledge doesn't require the active participation or consent of the Operator, then that's simpler.


It requires what is essentially magic, in a world where there is no magic, with the exception of The Operator.

Which means you have to explain how he got it, & how the rest of the cast did not.

Of course, this also holds true for any number of things. I'm still wondering why The Operator never seems to just pop into Jay's room.

Quote:
Even in the hard sciences, it can be difficult to establish standards for simplicity or efficiency.


I look for (1) how many deviations there are from the established rules & (2) how many unsupported assumptions that I have to make. Doing this, even dramatic reveals can often be reasonably predicted several scenes ahead. For instance, at least 1 person predicted ahead of time that the pills were used as some kind of "switch" for Tim's persona. The only time it really becomes useless is when a story abandons its internal logic entirely.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:13 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Jingleman
Decorated

Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 239
Location: Texas

Lithp wrote:
It requires what is essentially magic, in a world where there is no magic, with the exception of The Operator.

The whole thing is supernatural, and I should note that I only think it makes sense in the story so far if the Operator is the only source (or springs from the only source) of "magic" in the world. But TTA clearly has some kind of knowledge of the supernatural, and we don't know if that knowledge goes far enough to tap into some of that power (I don't really buy teleportation, so it's moot for me, anyway). Either way, it's a simpler theory if whatever knowledge TTA has comes from a natural source, like his experience or research, rather than some kind of parley with the Operator.

Lithp wrote:
I look for (1) how many deviations there are from the established rules & (2) how many unsupported assumptions that I have to make.


Those are important considerations, but they are assessments of, as you mentioned, internal consistency. These reference points can help show whether a theory is logically valid (using the academic sense of "valid" here). However, they're not the widely accepted standards by which simplicity is measured in literature or other forms of storytelling; there are none. Using these standards to measure whether one valid theory is simpler than another is an arbitrary choice, which is what I was pointing out before when I listed so many alternative ways to think about it. I'm glad you are considering these issues, but they don't make an idea more likely than any other internally coherent theory.

But before we go off much further into the world of philosophical heuristic tools for analysis, let me just return to the point of the discussion: "Isolation" could be taken to reinforce a TTA-Hoody alliance theory. I find that the great weight of evidence, but admittedly not all of the evidence, tends to oppose that idea. Frankly, I don't think we can move much further either way until we get something on the identity of TTA, or some of his backstory, or even just his next goal.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:48 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
paladin181
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 502

This video unfortunately is still too ambiguous for me as far as establishing Hoody's motives. He says "follow all." and shows a pic of him next to the Operator. That means to me that both he and the operator stalk people. Not necessarily together, and not with the same purpose. All it means to me is that he equates his own "watching" with that of the Operator. That's not the only interpretation, but it was the first impression I got.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
PlayerMann
Greenhorn

Joined: 06 Sep 2012
Posts: 7

Does anyone here have an idea of what Hoodie's referring to in the video?

Sorry, I'm a bit late to the party.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:00 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Animal
Decorated

Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 293

I was just re-watching entry 19 and in the video Jay says he watched TTA's response to 18 messages and then shows a video he found during his paranoia filming of masky appearing in his room and then taking him out of bed. After the video, Jay says "ToTheArk, who I suspect is the person wearing the mask, knows where I live."

So that explains who was controlling the camera during Return, and this also explains how Tim was making the TTA videos in the beginning, and the change of style is probably credited to the switch from masky to hoody. Which explains why hoody has been so dominant in the videos and masky doesn't appear to be involved or at least directly anymore. Hoody took it over.

Perhaps masky was alligned with the operator, but either masky changed his alliance for some reason to team up with hoody (probably because of alex?) or hoody just took over TTA completely and has different motives from masky

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Jingleman
Decorated

Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 239
Location: Texas

It doesn't really explain who shot "Return." This is an example of Jay being wrong. He was mistaken either way. If you believe that TTA is a group of people, then Jay was wrong here, because he assumed that TTA was the [singular] person in the mask. If, on the other hand, TTA is a single person, then Masky was merely a minion, as he appears to be now. Either way, Jay's wrong here. The only way he wasn't wrong is if TTA is an entirely different person now than it was in the beginning, who became (part of) TTA after 19.

We've been around and around on this one, but I still think that Masky's always been what he is now: a minion. A victimized pawn in Hoody's game.

Now, it is quite possible that Masky was the cameraman in "Return." But given what we now know, Jay didn't have enough information at the time for that comment in 19 to be helpful.

As far as a change in style goes, I still don't see it. TTA seems to jump from style to style depending on the message, as he always has. A lot of people have been commenting about how different this recent video is - a calm, bright departure in style for TTA. From a storytelling perspective, I don't see the effectiveness of having characters switching alliances willy nilly before we even know who they are or what anyone's goal is or who was on what side in the first place. Until I see something more explicit on the point, I'm going to go with the idea that the rules haven't changed while we weren't looking. There's a more detailed debate on this subject in the "Who is TTA?" thread (and in the twitter thread, come to think of it).

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:50 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Animal
Decorated

Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 293

Jingleman wrote:
It doesn't really explain who shot "Return." This is an example of Jay being wrong. He was mistaken either way. If you believe that TTA is a group of people, then Jay was wrong here, because he assumed that TTA was the [singular] person in the mask. If, on the other hand, TTA is a single person, then Masky was merely a minion, as he appears to be now. Either way, Jay's wrong here. The only way he wasn't wrong is if TTA is an entirely different person now than it was in the beginning, who became (part of) TTA after 19.

We've been around and around on this one, but I still think that Masky's always been what he is now: a minion. A victimized pawn in Hoody's game.

Now, it is quite possible that Masky was the cameraman in "Return." But given what we now know, Jay didn't have enough information at the time for that comment in 19 to be helpful.

As far as a change in style goes, I still don't see it. TTA seems to jump from style to style depending on the message, as he always has. A lot of people have been commenting about how different this recent video is - a calm, bright departure in style for TTA. From a storytelling perspective, I don't see the effectiveness of having characters switching alliances willy nilly before we even know who they are or what anyone's goal is or who was on what side in the first place. Until I see something more explicit on the point, I'm going to go with the idea that the rules haven't changed while we weren't looking. There's a more detailed debate on this subject in the "Who is TTA?" thread (and in the twitter thread, come to think of it).


Yes to the first part of your statement, but in regards to the change in style I would agree with you if Jay didn't make note of it himself. Although he is not the most reliable narrator and has been wrong before, I think he pointed that out for a reason.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lithp
I Have No Life


Joined: 04 Mar 2012
Posts: 2058

Quote:
From a storytelling perspective, I don't see the effectiveness of having characters switching alliances willy nilly before we even know who they are or what anyone's goal is or who was on what side in the first place.


Well, it makes it more difficult to figure out the mystery, of course.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 12 of 16 [236 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group