Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:37 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
[TTA] Surveillance
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 40 of 73 [1086 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, ..., 71, 72, 73  Next
Author Message
SaferSaturnX
Boot

Joined: 01 Oct 2011
Posts: 46

DHawk314 wrote:
C'mon guys, it's a short code, it's GONNA be some cryptically short statement anyway. If you think that's gonna disappoint you, I'd advise lowering your expectations now.

I'm actually kind of thinking it's going to be longer than we think due to the whole "one number means multiple letters" thing. If it's longer, at least it would explain why we haven't solved it. Then again, I have a friend who thinks that this is only the first half of the puzzle, in which case Jay really is trolling us.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:13 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
mokie
Unfettered

Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 374

SaferSaturnX wrote:
Dude, chill. I've been helping and offering possible solutions/suggestions for solving the code the whole time. I'm just offering my opinion that it doesn't appear to be in Morse code given that that goes against all the hints we've been given (as I read them anyway).


Dude, no. Opine all you like on whether morse will work or not (I don't think it's likely), but don't discourage people from trying it, slapping it, flipping and reversing it, spreading cheese on it... Even if a method doesn't turn up the answer, it may spark an idea that finally does deliver the right answer. The human brain needs to get weird and wander off in tangents sometimes to reach the right spot.

The bit about 'nothing helpful to offer' wasn't intended to be a personal slam, and I apologize--I was frustrated with a handful of similar comments dismissing an idea and offering a random observation the commenter made, but had clearly done nothing with. No results, nothing to point at and say that we'd at least tackled it, just, "No, no, stop doing that--I've noticed this thing, do something with that instead while I go lick grout."

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:34 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
kralyk
Boot

Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 63
Location: Czech Republic

evanx275h wrote:
Honestly, I think that those are the answers, because it'd be too damned lucky to come with an outcome that both spells out to something and sounds like it fits to its corresponding translation (YOUR and HER). And if it is, it's honestly a pretty important plot point.


No, you don't need to be that lucky. You actually could come up with all kinds of seemingly inteligent answers using various ways...

Check my earlier solution, it's on page 27. I got "AMENDED CAREER", I used both sets of numbers and I didn't even have to anagram it, it was direct.
Yet, it obviously was not the right solution. And these "your ark" and "her lies" "solutions" are even worse...

So just forget it. We need more letters. It's not this simple.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:39 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Hazman
Entrenched

Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Posts: 878
Location: New Zealand

agnosticAntagonist wrote:
I tried to connect the YOUR ARK, HER LIE theory to Jay's tweets here.

Quote:
Starting from the ground up:

1). Each pair of numbers is equivalent to one number

By adding the numbers that were aligned vertically, and then adding up the resulting numbers' digits, I received the single number that each pair was accountable for. This single number, in turn --
2). Each single number has multiple equivalent letters
I used QWERTY for this and thus only covered half of it — with marblechemist using the alphabet in tandem to the QWERTY system, each number had an equivalent of two letters to its name. (1=Q in QWERTY, 1=A in the alphabet. Same number, different letters)

3). not all letters are used within the solution
YOUR ARK, HER LIE.
Y O U R A K H E L I
10 unique letters are used.

4). Even with each number having multiple letters, some pairs add up to the same number — thus giving them common letters.
now, we're going to use an inverse of the system marblechemist and I used originally, for reasons that will be explained below.

Reverse the pairs (75-57, 72-27)
Subtract them instead of adding them (18, 45)
add together the resulting digits (1+8, 4+5)
you end up with 9, which would mean that both 27/72 and 57/75 would result in the same letters (O in Qwerty and I in alphabetics, yOur ark, her lIEs). Two pairs, resulting in the same single number, resulting in two common letters.


5). The method for 27-72 and 57-75 are inverse of the rest of the method.
The original method had you:

Add together the pairs (say, 79+83=162)
Add together the resulting digits (1+6+2=9)
take the final number and find its corresponding letter in both QWERTY and the alphabet (9=O in QWERTY and I in alphabetics)


But! since 27-72 and 57-75 are supposed to be a mirror of this method;

Order them inversely (72-27 instead of 27-72)
Subtract them (72-27=45)
Add together the resulting digits (4+5=9)
Assign the resulting number its corresponding letters in QWERTY and alphabetics (9=O in QWERTY, I in alphabetics, yOur ark, her lIes)


If I'm doing this right here then marblechemist/our theory might actually agree with Jay's tweets?
PLEASE: add suggestions and comments! I don't want to be making a fool outta us two here, this is just what I've been trying to piece together after stumbling upon the "YOUR ARK" thing entirely without meaning to!


You said 10 unique letters. Jay mentioned 9 unique numbers/letters. Just pointing it out there

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:44 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Blank_Zero
Unfettered


Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Posts: 537

YOUR ARK isn't the answer, but it was a really good shot at trying to figure it out. Lets continue trying new ideas instead if bickering about how wrong it was, k?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:21 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
alec
Kilroy

Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 2

has anyone tried Pythagorean encryption yet? i'm trying it now but not getting much out of it. it has numbers 1-9 and each number corresponds to more than one letter. from there it's a scramble/guessing code.

EDIT: the first two sets are:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):

G I G E H C B G G B B D
P R P N A L K P P K K M
Y Y W Z U T Y Y T T V

H C G E F H A C H C B G G I
Q L P N O Q J L Q L K P P R
Z U Y W X Z S U Z U T Y Y


i got gibberish out of it, but it was worth a shot.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:45 am
Last edited by alec on Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:59 am; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
karalynnp123
Boot

Joined: 05 Jan 2013
Posts: 12

He tweeted...or someone hacked him and tweeted...

"@marblehornets: 9513390313793583953179"

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:56 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Δ
Boot


Joined: 22 Aug 2011
Posts: 25



Edit: Ninja'd.
_________________
My name's Δ, spelled Δ (just type & # 9 1 6 ; without spaces), and pronounced Delta.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:58 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
karalynnp123
Boot

Joined: 05 Jan 2013
Posts: 12

karalynnp123 wrote:
He tweeted...or someone hacked him and tweeted...

"@marblehornets: 9513390313793583953179"



This one has a zero...and ones

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:00 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ThinSuit
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 521
Location: Rosswood Park

Holy shit this has to be something REALLY important
_________________
From the start it's been a game for us. Not anymore. I'm coming for you.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:24 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
kralyk
Boot

Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 63
Location: Czech Republic

I think it can be assumed that the numbers from twitter are the same encryption as the ones from video.

Let's see them in pairs:
Code:
95 13 39 03 13 79 35 83 95 31 79


Observations:

    There is 22 numbers, possibly 11 pairs. Following obsevations are concerned with them being pairs, like previously.
    There are some common numbers with the sets from the video. 83, 79 (twice), 13 (twice, or if 13 = 31, then even thrice).
    There is 5 new unique values: 03, 31, 35, 39, 95
    The numbers, by and large, don't any more folow the ±2 & ±5 pattern. ±6, ±4 and ±3 have been added to that, making it imho insignificant.
    All the new numbers except 95 and 35 are prime numbers.
    Even with 5 new unique values (totaling 14 with the numbers from video), that is still quite a low number should one pair equal one letter. And that numbers gets even lower if xy = yx. In other words, there is not much entropy in pairs.


Elaborating on the low unique values count, Jay's words that one pair may represent multiple letters doesn't necessarily mean the message is longer - it could mean that one pair is one letter, but that letter differs each time the pair is used. That could make it possible to express more letters using smaller set of unique numbers. Also, if one pair was set in stone with one letter, we probably would have unveiled it by now. On the other hand, this hypothesis does not go well with the fact that there are repetitive pairs in the first place. Maybe the cipher was done purposefully to appear as lacking entropy? Don't know.

Any other observations?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:16 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
LBfly
Decorated


Joined: 17 Nov 2012
Posts: 216

I counted 22 letters, 11 pairs. We cant line them vertically to decode the same way Alexia did.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:27 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
kralyk
Boot

Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Posts: 63
Location: Czech Republic

Yeah, noticed, it's corrected now... Wink

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:30 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Abalone
Veteran


Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Posts: 119
Location: Under the bridge

I deem this the "Code of Many Crumpled Paper Balls."

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:42 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Abalone
Veteran


Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Posts: 119
Location: Under the bridge

I also notice this new Twitter post breaks up the nice, neat 2/5 observations some of us had notes earlier. 95 (9 and 5 being 4 integers apart) and 39 (6 apart) don't fit now.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:53 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 40 of 73 [1086 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, ..., 71, 72, 73  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group