Author
Message
anders
Guest
cutting waffers? I just recieved my package today, and one thing popped to mind.
At the "back" of the waffers I could interpret the symbols as "cut a hole in the hexagon (if thats what its called)" The white hexagon in the black frame could be a hole right?
Maybe this cutout waffer should be moved over the data_1 card according to the "base sequence" which is also displayed on the "front" of the data_1 card.
This would also explain the need to refill waffers.
the data_2 card is still a complete mystery to me.
Any thoughts?
Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 1:32 pm
Noi
Boot
Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 64 Location: Sweden
oh, interesting!
Thats really a good point, great work anders!
Maybe someone should order a extra set of wafers and try it out?
Perhaps me?
Too be continued.. .
Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 3:34 pm
Luffarn
Guest
I dont think that the wafers is to be refilled in a physical sense... more like they are cannisters of fule that is gradually drained and cannot be refilled except by physicaly refilling your stock of wafers
Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 4:03 pm
Nyght_Shyft
Decorated
Joined: 05 May 2003 Posts: 243 Location: everywhere and nowhere
Luffarn wrote:
I dont think that the wafers is to be refilled in a physical sense... more like they are cannisters of fule that is gradually drained and cannot be refilled except by physicaly refilling your stock of wafers
That's an excellent point, Luffarn.. and it goes along with what marc has been saying, about this dealing with non-physical dimensions.
Although I do think someone cutting them would be an excellent idea. Has anyone actually tried it?
Have to think outside the box...
_________________Nyght_Shyft - Happy Hunting
"Victory? Defeat? Irrelevant. What's important is the battle, and nothing else."
Posted: Tue May 20, 2003 4:12 pm
brotherspider
Veteran
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 88 Location: Terra, Sol system
uhhh Marc also noted that one person may feel the need for many wafer refills and some would feel no need at all... just an observation
_________________"It's a judgment call and I'm making it... I could be wrong... but I'm not."
-Bill Hicks
Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 4:39 am
Luffarn
Kilroy
Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 2
well maybe the path to the trip will be longer for some and will require more fuel (waffers)
Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 9:40 am
Griffin
Boot
Joined: 21 May 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Kvatur Gloon
Maybe i have missed something, but have Marc said that you actually need to refill the 1st tripp waffers?
I always thought that refilling the waffers means that you buy new ones for new tripps? The basepackage is the same and you only refill the waffers.
Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 10:31 am
MickeM
Boot
Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 31 Location: Sweden (stockholm)
marc has said only some people will need to refill there waffers.
So it cant include damageing them in any way... as that would require everyone to refill them.
But I sopouse it would be possible for some to need to cut them
Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 11:22 am
AnthraX101
Entrenched
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 797
Not nessicarily, you have three wafers. If you only need to cut the three (or only one of them) then you will have no need for refills.
But I don't think that you need to cut them either...
AnthraX101
Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 11:26 am
Mastrein
Boot
Joined: 13 May 2003 Posts: 49 Location: Stockholm
This part really bugs me out
_________________...chop chop...
Posted: Wed May 21, 2003 11:39 am
brotherspider
Veteran
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 88 Location: Terra, Sol system
yeah
Quote:
Not nessicarily, you have three wafers. If you only need to cut the three (or only one of them) then you will have no need for refills.
But I don't think that you need to cut them either...
Yeah thats exactly what Im thinking Anthrax... doesnt help me understand what they're for though...
_________________"It's a judgment call and I'm making it... I could be wrong... but I'm not."
-Bill Hicks
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 5:35 am
Guest
Guest
I'm about to bring out the scalpel and start cutting in one of my wafers.. Because there are three, semingly similar cards, if i destroy one it wouldn't matter cos i have two more. I hope.
It sure semes that the black hexagon is supposed to be on top of the red one, just woundering how i am supposed to cut, the whole black square or just the whole or both?
Also, it is made of much softer plastic, as if it was supposed to be cut in.
The hole that would be left in the wafer could fit on several things on the other cards.
It would also explain why one would need to refill the wafers.
And when i asked mark a couple of questions on the redkore.com forum he didn't answer the one about cutting in the wafers.
Damn.. Make me decide!! Should i cut?
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 3:08 pm
Griffin
Boot
Joined: 21 May 2003 Posts: 24 Location: Kvatur Gloon
Make a copy of the card!!
Cut that one and see if it will help you.
Im too smart for this
Posted: Thu May 22, 2003 6:50 pm
MickeM
Boot
Joined: 20 May 2003 Posts: 31 Location: Sweden (stockholm)
there was a similar query at rk.com and marc said that he encourage exploration so it will possibly not du any harm (ie. the TELEPORT will "work" with only two or one waffer)
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 2:16 am
nannou
Boot
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 10 Location: Skåne/Sweden
I did cut it but nothing happend..
I decided to cut the red hexagon, it semed like the best thing to do, it you try to fit the two hexagons over the other cards the red one makes most sense. Am going to try some more stuff with it later this weekend.
from rk.com:
each trip involves a different manipulation of the guiding shape's energy.
Couldn't this be interpretated to: make a hole in the wafer acording to the guidingshape (hexagon) and the project something like the magnet or light or something throu this guiding shape.
BUT the guiding shape should be the rectangle.. shouldn't it?
_________________Rädda joppe. Död eller levande.
Posted: Fri May 23, 2003 5:59 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending