Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 18, 2024 8:53 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
[SPEC] Choice of Initials for Cube thieves
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [5 Posts]  
Author Message
Jakeo
Decorated

Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Edinburgh

[SPEC] Choice of Initials for Cube thieves

Ok, been lurking for too long and not contributing, so here goes. This is probably related to the thread '[SPEC] Mystery of the theft (http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=186543)'

I was thinking about why the initials should have been chosen as they were. with the Q and K there I began thinking about playing cards. Dug around and found this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playing_cards

There's lots of interesting stuff there if your interested in the history, but in particular:

Quote:
The Europeans experimented with the structure of playing cards, particularly in the 1400s. Europeans changed the court cards to represent European royalty and attendants, originally "king", "chevalier", and "knave" (or "servant"). Queens were introduced in a number of different ways. In an early surviving German pack (dated in the 1440s), Queens replace Kings in two of the suits as the highest card. Throughout the 1400s, 56-card decks containing a King, Queen, Knight, and Valet were common


So, I would suggest that the initials are in fact

Q - Queen
C - Chevalier
K - King/Knight
V - Valet (Jack/Knave)

I know its pretty loose spec but the choice of initials just seems to me to be likely to mean something.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:25 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Avatrix
Unfettered


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 413
Location: Boston, MA

I like the idea, but my initial gut feeling is that it doesn't work out right. The cards don't seem to match the persons. For example, "K", the king, turns out to be female, while "Q" the queen, turns out to be male. "V", the valet, seems to be the team leader, rather than the third or fourth in rank, as the cards would dictate.

Still, I think this was a great idea to look at--something I'm sure many of us didn't know. It may yet turn into something!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 11:03 am
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
European Chris
Unfictologist


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 1264
Location: London's trendy Whitechapel

I think the cards being of a 'wrong' gender is something of an irrelevance, however the ranking of the cards would indicate that this may not be the right path-although the do appear to be in reverse order of what we know to be the seniority. (I've always assumed Bernardo Holyoke was least important-although I'm not sure there's any evidence to support this) The possibility of different suits sometime in the future though might provide more of a differenciation though.

However I'm in complete agreement that this was a good shout.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/


PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 11:32 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Arashi
Decorated


Joined: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Well, I definatly like the idea - but as the other two have said, I would tend to disagree because of the ranking.

Holyoke was pretty much a nobody, a small time fencer, where as V is "Powerful", Monica is a fairly reputable banker and "C" is.. well - C.

I'm not going to discount the idea just yet however, seeing as how everything seems to be the exact opposite of what it needs to be. (Coincidence, I think not!)

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:24 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
dawh25
Boot

Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 21
Location: Michigan

I never got the feeling that they really had ranks. V was the leader, but beyond that, it seems to me that they were all on the level. If you had to rank them, my impressions are as follows.

From the way that K referred to C, I got the impression that C was either very arrogant or very inexperienced. I could be wrong, but with Holyoake in his 50s, I always looked at C as the youngest (though perhaps not least) member. Holyoake may have been a small-time fencer, but that doesn't mean that he was a nobody.

Just because someone is a small criminal doesn't mean that they don't have a significant expertise in one field or another. We believe that he was the hardware expert, and he'd have to be pretty good at what he does to complete the tasks at hand, though I admit we don't know what he did. However, the reports said that they needed a hardware and a software expert, so I wouldn't discount Holyoake as the least member. Each member was hand-picked for their experience, and even with security lax, it wasn't non-existent. Everyone was there for a reason, so I personally wouldn't say that anyone except V had any standing over anyone else.

Though, if forced to choose, I'd say:

V,K,Q,C

V was the leader. We don't know K's expertise, but with her job as an economic consultant, I'd say that she has a head for numbers and organization, and some of that experience could be useful in sychronizing events. Q, the suspected harward expert, would likely have been one of the more senior members of the group. And of course C comes last because of my impression of her as the youngest member.

Of course, conversations with TA may prove this all wrong.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [5 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group