Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:59 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[SPOILERS] "the creepy people-sucking underbelly"
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 6 [89 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
Headman
Entrenched


Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 839
Location: Michigan

xboyonfirex wrote:
Okay, I'm saying it just to say it... Did anyone consider the thought that J.J. Abrams didn't mean 'a baby' in the literal sense? When I read it, along w/ the other material- it sounds to me that the surface world is all new and frightening to it.


This quote from Matt Reeves should clear up your "baby" issue:
Quote:
The key to it is that the monster was a baby. The monster was suffering from separation anxiety and was absolutely disoriented and pissed, "where's mommy?", and terrified. That was the most important aspect of the creature. Not only was he furious and in a rage but he was scared, because to me there's nothing scarier than something huge that's spooked.


Edit: Transparent Blue beat me to it. Embarassed

xboyonfirex wrote:
Also, Does anyone remember what Marlena said in the beginning part of the destruction? After the building collapses and they eventually come out of the store... She's all covered in dust, and they tell her that it's time to go, she randomly responds to them about something she saw, something that it did.


Trixx is correct, she said it was eating everyone.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ScubaSteve1717
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 89

she could have meant with its mouth

if i saw people getting sucked into its stomach i'd say sucked not eaten

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
blaaaaaah
Unfettered

Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 313

ScubaSteve1717 wrote:
she could have meant with its mouth

if i saw people getting sucked into its stomach i'd say sucked not eaten


So..you'd rather her say "it's sucking everyone"?

I..wouldn't prefer that.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ScubaSteve1717
Veteran

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 89

thats the only possible way you managed to form that?

its sucking everyone up

it was sucking people into its stomach

makes far more sense then its sucking everyone

if you saw something like that you would want to get it across to people properly, you wouldnt say eaten

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:44 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Saiyan King
Unfettered


Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 599
Location: Orlando, The crappiest town in America, thanks to Disney

Headman wrote:
xboyonfirex wrote:
Okay, I'm saying it just to say it... Did anyone consider the thought that J.J. Abrams didn't mean 'a baby' in the literal sense? When I read it, along w/ the other material- it sounds to me that the surface world is all new and frightening to it.


This quote from Matt Reeves should clear up your "baby" issue:
Quote:
The key to it is that the monster was a baby. The monster was suffering from separation anxiety and was absolutely disoriented and pissed, "where's mommy?", and terrified. That was the most important aspect of the creature. Not only was he furious and in a rage but he was scared, because to me there's nothing scarier than something huge that's spooked.


Edit: Transparent Blue beat me to it. Embarassed

xboyonfirex wrote:
Also, Does anyone remember what Marlena said in the beginning part of the destruction? After the building collapses and they eventually come out of the store... She's all covered in dust, and they tell her that it's time to go, she randomly responds to them about something she saw, something that it did.


Trixx is correct, she said it was eating everyone.



There is another interview with Reeves, and i apologize that i cant find the link to it, where he says its "like" a baby, seeing the world for the first time, plus he also states that its been underwater for thousands of years , so how could it be a baby? Seems like conflicting statements there. Plus the exact thing Marlena was saying was " Why was it eating everyone?" , she said it two or three times. On the Reeves quote, im not saying anyones wrong , im just saying it seems conflicting. How can something be a baby if its thousands of years old? But then again, were dealing with a mythical beast, so i guess anythings possible
_________________
Nobody kills Kakkarot while im around, destiny has reserved that pleasure for me

The funniest stories always end with "and thats the last time i ever did acid"

Im sorry, I can't loan you $20, Im saving it for Slenderman


PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:06 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jamman1
Decorated


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 159
Location: Indiana

Saiyan King wrote:
How can something be a baby if its thousands of years old?


http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=23946

I call it the "cicada theory." I'm not saying that MGP is a cicada (he totally isn't), but I do think that they share a similar lifestyle (comparatively) which gives us a glimpse of similar phenomena in reality.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:40 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Rudyred
Boot


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 15
Location: Lake Superior

However, the one time we actually see MGP eat someone, he definitely uses his mouth. Why would he have two different ways of eating?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:38 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Lor87
Kilroy

Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 2

Rudyred wrote:
However, the one time we actually see MGP eat someone, he definitely uses his mouth. Why would he have two different ways of eating?


Well when he does "eat" with his mouth it doesnt really show the person to be eaten, you dont see their whole body, you just see that the monster kinda chews him up and spits him back on the groud. Maybe he has to chew up the subject then suck it through the underbelly "tube" things? I dunno, just an idea whether it makes much sense at all or not.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:20 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Trixx
Decorated


Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 162
Location: Sydney, Australia

matt reeves said that there were things that the monster was able to do that they didn't have a place or the budget to show in the movie...and i'm assuming this was one of them

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:53 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tracheotome
Boot

Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 22

ok girl sees people getting sucked in to another life forms body a life form no one has ever seen before that girl is going to assume that these people are being eaten. i dont know which one of you would say "oh people suckers" as fellow new yorkers are being swallowed by who knows what i mean obviously none of us know what it is and most of us have been trying to figure it out since the end of summer

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:09 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Slusho Addict
Entrenched


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 920

tracheotome wrote:
ok girl sees people getting sucked in to another life forms body a life form no one has ever seen before that girl is going to assume that these people are being eaten. i dont know which one of you would say "oh people suckers" as fellow new yorkers are being swallowed by who knows what i mean obviously none of us know what it is and most of us have been trying to figure it out since the end of summer


Indeed, she may not have even seen that it had a head.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:14 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
6slushos
Veteran


Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 118
Location: Singapore

i guess this was to just let us know that the monster can do something else instead of putting things in its mouth.
...those suckers are kinda weird heh? lol.

i think she used eat because its something she assumed when she saw people being "taken" by it?

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:21 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
wolfz0rz
Veteran


Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 72

6slushos wrote:
i guess this was to just let us know that the monster can do something else instead of putting things in its mouth.
...those suckers are kinda weird heh? lol.

i think she used eat because its something she assumed when she saw people being "taken" by it?


Or maybe she was just shaken up by the fact that there was a giant monster in NYC, that typically doesn't happen. I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty certain that if I were in the situation, I wouldn't be too worried about accurately representing what the monster was doing.
_________________
Truly epic lulz.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:23 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
rhesusmonkeyboy
Decorated


Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 183
Location: SEARCH

 So lazy wolfz0rz

wolfz0rz wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty certain that if I were in the situation, I wouldn't be too worried about accurately representing what the monster was doing.


Sooo lazy!

You'd scream, "Run! Just run!" C'mon, people need more information.

Quote:
Run! Run! Some creature whose head appears vaguely bat-like, and it had 2 "elbows" per arm, what's that called, "multi-articulated" wha? Thanks internet lurker, and it had 2 smaller arms that served no purpose near as I could tell ... anyways, it's approximately 25 stories tall, but this is in a "4 legged stance" ...


PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Everything's Magic
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 491
Location: Michigan

I think it just had teethy tubes on its belly that it grabbed people with. Then, it may have thrown them into its mouth or sucked them into its stomach.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:07 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 6 [89 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group