Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 11:13 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
Poll

Do you think Cloverfield has the best special effects ever?

Yes
27%
 27%  [ 10 ]
I've seen better
8%
 8%  [ 3 ]
They're better than most movies
54%
 54%  [ 20 ]
They're on par with most movies
8%
 8%  [ 3 ]
They're worse than most movies
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]

Total Votes : 37

 
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Do you think Cloverfield has the best special effects ever?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 2 [16 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
bloopbloop
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 329

Do you think Cloverfield has the best special effects ever?

Hmm?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:01 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Hibari-san
Boot

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31

The monster looks out of place in some scenes, but the destruction of New York looked really realistic.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:03 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
bloopbloop
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Posts: 329

Hibari-san wrote:
The monster looks out of place in some scenes, but the destruction of New York looked really realistic.


Probably because Tippett Studio had to add the monster into Double Negative's scenes.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:07 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Hibari-san
Boot

Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 31

bloopbloop wrote:
Hibari-san wrote:
The monster looks out of place in some scenes, but the destruction of New York looked really realistic.


Probably because Tippett Studio had to add the monster into Double Negative's scenes.


Indeed. But the special effects were still top-notch.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
WartyHogger
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 116

They were impressive, Transformers had great special effects aswell, but Cloverfield had the special effects i like. Destruction! Buildings on top of one another. The sound effects were badass aswell, ,like as soon as they leave Beth's place when the 3 rockets fly over their heads, loved that on surround sound turned up loud, and the monsters screams ofcourse Smile

Can't wait to see what Clover2 will bring us next Wink

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:15 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

When you watch the DVD Special Features you really find out the staggering amount of effects that were used not just on the monster and the usual explosions and such, but just to add in views of a city that actually exists. The fact that they created something real via artificial means, while we usually think of effects being used to create things we think of as totally unreal is an amazing paradox to me. Most films with a budget 3 times the amount would've just filmed NYC itself with massive set work and just CGI for what they couldn't destroy or physically mock up. The fact that I didn't suspect that so much of the landscape was CGI and at the same time that what I knew were effects looked pretty convincing says a lot to me. I didn't vote that the effects were best ever, because there weren't really a lot of new novel effects used or created for the film - but the use of existing effects techniques was more novel.

Hibari-san wrote:
The monster looks out of place in some scenes, but the destruction of New York looked really realistic.

Could that just be the fact that there's a freaking 350 foot ashen white creature roaming the city, breaking everything, and eating people? New York City has a lot of things going on, but I just don't think you see that every day.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:51 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Clover
Decorated


Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 218
Location: TX

Given their budget, I think the effects were phenomonal. I still don't have the DVD yet* so I'm just going by hazy recollections from January, but... Yeah. Effects were awesome. Not just the city. I mean, Clover had skin texture, barnacles falling off, there were webs of veins in it's head-sac things. Alot of detail and love went into this movie. ;P


* (I don't live anywhere near to an Suncoast/FYE, and I really want the Steelbook. I'll be happy to trade if someone gets me the Steelbook I'll get them the target or Best Buy editions, or I'll just pay you back in cash. And cookies! =D)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:50 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
pegassissy
Unfettered

Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 552

Are we forgetting king kong? Or jaws(for its time)? Granted Cloverfield has amazing special effects, there are a handful of movies that top it. Spiderman is up there too. There is one movie that is slipping my mind and its killing me , but yeah king kong has the greatest special effects ever

EDIT: Thank you Lambo_Diablo_Svtt transformers did it better.
_________________
And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...


PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:46 pm
Last edited by pegassissy on Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:11 pm; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
[LBJ]
Kilroy


Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 2

The special effects are very, very good, but what makes them look THAT good is because of the Handheld camera bumping around, They look more "In place". Instead just a still shot with a monster moving around, or a still shot of a destroyed building.

Believe me, I'm a video editor, and my favorite technique is "Motion Tracking", which is basically adding something to a shaky video that wasn't there when you were filming. It makes it look more, "Real", or "in place"

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:15 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Lambo_Diablo_Svtt
Entrenched


Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 914

Best Special Effects ever? No.

REALLY damn good effects for a $25m budget? Hell yeah.

I would say Cloverfield is less of Best effects ever (Transformers takes the cake* for this)... and more of best effects for the amount of time + money spent.

*And no... this cake isn't a lie.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jarofsap704
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 426
Location: Toronto

The effects in this movie were fantastic, but I'm still scratching my head over why we haven't topped Jurassic Park yet. Those are still the best creature effects I've ever seen. Everyone agree? So it's 15 years later, HOW HAVE WE NOT TOPPED THAT YET?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 4:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
WartyHogger
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 116

jarofsap704 wrote:
The effects in this movie were fantastic, but I'm still scratching my head over why we haven't topped Jurassic Park yet. Those are still the best creature effects I've ever seen. Everyone agree? So it's 15 years later, HOW HAVE WE NOT TOPPED THAT YET?


King Kong? Had some pretty neat creatures, Giant Millipedes WHOO! And the King Kong vs T-Rex fight. *drool*

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Monstrous
Unfettered


Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 526

jarofsap704 wrote:
The effects in this movie were fantastic, but I'm still scratching my head over why we haven't topped Jurassic Park yet. Those are still the best creature effects I've ever seen. Everyone agree? So it's 15 years later, HOW HAVE WE NOT TOPPED THAT YET?

We will never know. The guys at ILM are geniuses.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jarofsap704
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 426
Location: Toronto

Ya, king kong was amazing, but to me nothing has looked as real as Jurassic Park. That's one of the only movies where I felt the creatures were actually there with the actors.

Others come really close too, the first 2 Alien movies, of course King King, all 3 Lord of the Rings, etc, all the usuals. But nothing has touched JP yet in my opinion.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:24 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SlushomakesMEhappy
Decorated


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 164

Star Wars episode III's opening scene in space was the BEST

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:32 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [16 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group