Author
Message
Guest
Guest
Neo's boss in the Matrix Surely they'll still have him working for Metacortex if they have Thomas Anderson still on their Redland database directory? Would be worth checking out if there is a first name for him. Wasn't his surname Rhineheart?
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 5:41 pm
BoyC
Boot
Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 36
Yes it was, but apparently he didn't have a first name at all...
At least I didn't find it in any cast listings etc
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 5:54 pm
Guest
Guest
Re: Neo's boss in the Matrix
Anonymous wrote:
Surely they'll still have him working for Metacortex if they have Thomas Anderson still on their Redland database directory? Would be worth checking out if there is a first name for him. Wasn't his surname Rhineheart?
I've been thinking the same thing. Tried about 50 different "common" names for him... I agree that he simply must be in their db, but:
- could be in different location's db (if they ever go up)
- we might have to wait for a clue as to his first name
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:09 am
Demonico
Boot
Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 24
A bit off topic, but relevant nevertheless:
- If Neo is still in the db after being transferred to another unit, Rhineheart should be there too. Currently working there or not.
So, I'm thinking theres 3 possibilities:
1) He IS in there, and we just haven't found him yet
2) He's not there, and that's a clue (been erased, along the lines of Avery?) - I don't think that one's likely though.
3) He's not there because the db we have access to is not for the same department which we see Neo working for in the Matrix.. Maybe the db we have access to is from the department Neo worked in, BEFORE the storyline of the 1st movie?
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 6:25 am
BoyC
Boot
Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 36
You forgot the most obvious thing:
The archive says (as far as i remember atm, the site is too busy to load now :) that only those can be found in the database publicly who didn't request their removal.
Maybe after we are able to log in...
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 6:56 am
Demonico
Boot
Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 24
BoyC wrote:
You forgot the most obvious thing:
The archive says (as far as i remember atm, the site is too busy to load now that only those can be found in the database publicly who didn't request their removal.
Maybe after we are able to log in...
heh.. Obviously, that could be an explanation as well
- I'll just go feed myself a trout.
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:08 am
Guest
Guest
The MOST obvious is that the ARG overlooked his character.
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:05 am
Demonico
Boot
Joined: 05 Oct 2003 Posts: 24
Anonymous wrote:
The MOST obvious is that the ARG overlooked his character.
Somehow I don't think that's very likely...
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 8:25 am
winjer509
Boot
Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 23
He's not there... somebody hacked the flash file and found the xml document that's "feeding" the fake database... so far we've discovered all the names the program holds.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:41 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending