Author
Message
Allattar
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 8
ooooh hang on
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
The 25800 year cycle is the precession cycle of the earth.
There is a 22000 year elliptical cycle in changes in the ellipse the Earth follows. See Milankovitch cycles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycle
However there is also a 41000 year Rotational Angle cycle.....
Ow head hurts. Do I pick the one I think it should be from above or is it even more complex than that?
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:32 am
Allattar
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 8
grrr its not
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
22
So that rules out that one.
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:34 am
doublecross
Unfettered
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 588 Location: London, UK
Nor
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
41
_________________xx
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:50 am
Dragonscales
Guest
Allattar wrote:
Can we get a hint as to how you solved it?
And the answer is just in numbers of millenia? or should it be specified as years?
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
ie: did you put the answer as 26 for 26 millenia (note 26 doesnt work as the answer as noted above) or did you put 25800 for the number of years it takes for the Earth to return to the same point in the Great year.
How I solved it... let me see...
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Guesswork - I saw that someone had tried *edited*, and guessed it from there. Sorry I can't be of any more use.
Ben
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:54 am
fretty
Decorated
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 281 Location: South Yorkshire, England
How near was it to the answers already tried?
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:57 am
Allattar
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 8
If anyone is interested
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
If its 26000 years for the precession
22000 years for the ecliptic cycle
and 41000 years for the tilt.
You would need to wait 2132000 years to return to the same conditions.
phew.
Oh and Ben tell us if you used millenia, or years as the answer. Before we go crazy.
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:04 am
doublecross
Unfettered
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 588 Location: London, UK
The card asks for millennia, so surely that's what the unit is.
Am I the 'someone'?
_________________xx
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:28 am
fretty
Decorated
Joined: 19 Nov 2004 Posts: 281 Location: South Yorkshire, England
Hooray, solved it:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
There is one number that managed to slip through the woodwork in the twenties.
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:23 pm
rainbowtrout
Boot
Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 29 Location: Boyle, Roscommon
woohoo!!! my first top ten.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
and NOW i see the clue above
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:42 pm
aliendial
Unfictologist
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 3438 Location: Far Far Away. Nowhere Near You. Really.
woo! finally! black leitmark! thanks for the hints, guys. top 12 only. I'll take it.
_________________aliendial
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:05 pm
Dragonscales
Guest
fretty wrote:
Hooray, solved it:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
There is one number that managed to slip through the woodwork in the twenties.
Precisely. I'll post the solve but only cos I'm nice...
A couple of you were so close... but the answer is
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
23
Ben
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:49 pm
Allattar
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 8
I still want to know where they get that number from...
ahhhhh its going to haunt me now.
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:47 am
Asib
Boot
Joined: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 28
ill put you out of your misery
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
the wiki is wrong the equinox proccession is 23000 yrs not 22
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:38 am
Dragonscales
Guest
Ditto to Allattar, I'd also like to know where we get that number from. Can anyone provide a reliable solution?
Ben
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 am
aliendial
Unfictologist
Joined: 29 Sep 2002 Posts: 3438 Location: Far Far Away. Nowhere Near You. Really.
Dragonscales, look at Asib's post just above yours.
_________________aliendial
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:46 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending