Author
Message
Chump Force 1
Decorated
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 286 Location: Next in line after 'Client 9'
Here are two more from that interview:
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:22 am
I'M HUGE!
Decorated
Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 215 Location: U.S. 447
Chump Force 1 wrote:
Here are two more from that interview:
2nd pic really looks like a dance to me. And Rob looks like he's covering his ears. Smells like a clue! (maybe the monster likes bad, but still danceable music)
_________________
Your retarted.
An anagram for JJ Abrams is Cloverfield.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:25 am
Bacon Army
Unfettered
Joined: 01 Nov 2007 Posts: 447
Chump Force 1 wrote:
Here are two more from that interview:
IT'S MOLLY RINGWALD!!
Wait...no...
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:06 am
Ecks51
Unfettered
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 644 Location: The Snow-covered Meadows
I'M HUGE! wrote:
Chump Force 1 wrote:
Here are two more from that interview:
2nd pic really looks like a dance to me. And Rob looks like he's covering his ears. Smells like a clue! (maybe the monster likes bad, but still danceable music)
Hmm that might explain the picture of the boombox through the back window. lol
_________________
Look out for when you go fishing for clues.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:17 am
Clover
Decorated
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 218 Location: TX
I'M HUGE! wrote:
Wow, those are nice images. Looks like fake blood, btw. Darn low budget movie. Why Abrams, why???!!
Considering what we've seen of the movie is choppy shaky shadowy camerawork, maybe they figured why waste money on realistic blood when no one will see it that much anyway? : )
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:44 am
sami_kaye
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Posts: 382 Location: Moncton
saneman wrote:
Well, from the trailer I'm in the Shadow Monsters are actually Hazmat Suits camp, largely because of Nonplussed Man in Glasses who's sitting right in front of 'em.
I was kinda wondering about the woman's midsection expanding obscenely and the sound effects seeming to imply that she explodes. Did she have lil' monsters in her a la Parasite? A version of the plague that seems to exist? Indigestion? Something else?
Maybe she had a real bad allergic reaction to Slusho!. It could happen. Either that or someone was serving some nasty food at that party.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:20 am
Last edited by sami_kaye on Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Be@rbrick
Boot
Joined: 16 Sep 2007 Posts: 69 Location: Ohio
eleven11 wrote:
In another thread someone suggested that the hazmat suits were just place holders due to their color. Besides the fact that suits would probably be skin tight with little dots all over them to track movement, I think the hazmat suits are staying in the movie. For me the gloves give it away, they're black and therefore I don't think they could edit them as easily. It would be much easier to give the actors blue gloves then spend extra time editing out black gloves.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:03 pm
A Wise Observer
Boot
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 10
I'm pretty sure that the "stagehand" is actually Rob in a hazmat suit. The lighting on his face suggest a plexiglas shield. One of you should be able to enlarge the image and match up his facial features.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:17 pm
Fehdman_Kassad
Boot
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 Posts: 58
So,
I take a few days off and they release a trailer... damn...
But here are a few things I was thinking about re: putting theories to rest. Take this quote from the Lizzy Caplan interview.
Quote:
BB: What are some of the more ridiculous speculations?
LC: There's all this YouTube stuff about analyzing the trailer. People are seeing things that aren't there and making up stuff that isn't true. There's this one still of me and Jessica Lucas, who's another actress in the film, and people thought there was some crazy lion behind us. But people are wrong.
This will put to rest the "Lion" theory, the "hair demon" theory AND the pervasive "it's the same girl in the pic" theory all at once. Now that's efficient!
The trailer also depicts NYC in what appears to be late summer. There are shots of the city and park with no snow and leaves on the trees. That removes the "61 degrees in January" issue as well. The date of the movie (1-18-0 is not the time that the movie took place.
But I want to add a few new theories...
1) I think the military/government designation at the beginning of the new trailer is part of a "frame" for the movie. I think that the movie might be setup as an analysis (by the military perhaps) of what happened "that fateful day" from evidence collected from the site. This would also allow for any, and perhaps all, of the main characters to die and live on only in digital memory.
2) I am starting to wonder about the line "I've seen it
its alive!". If I saw a giant Godzilla/Whale/Lizard I wouldn't tell anyone it was alive, that would be obvious. To state that something is alive is something you would say about a thing that people would not normally think was alive (i.e. a zombie, not a corpse a golem, not a statue a transformer, not a car). Add this to the guys in Hazmat suits and the expanding woman thingy and I am starting to think we have a Blob type monster. Something that can infect prey with venom or de-coagulants or something.
Thoughts anyone?
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:25 pm
DougBThree
Decorated
Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 249 Location: Florida
Fehdman_Kassad wrote:
The date of the movie (1-18-0 is not the time that the movie took place.
Um, then why are the photos depicting the party and aftermath on www.1-18-08.com dated and timestamped with that date?
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:34 pm
mars.PDX
Veteran
Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 81
Fehdman_Kassad wrote:
I am starting to think we have a Blob type monster. Something that can infect prey with venom or de-coagulants or something.
Thoughts anyone?
Not so sure on that. I would assume most gelatinous "creatures" would probably not have the ability to create "vocal" noise, i.e. the roar.
Unless I totally missed what you were trying to convey.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:37 pm
tstrel
Decorated
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Posts: 168 Location: Jacksonville, Fl
DougBThree wrote:
Fehdman_Kassad wrote:
The date of the movie (1-18-0 is not the time that the movie took place.
Um, then why are the photos depicting the party and aftermath on www.1-18-08.com dated and timestamped with that date?
Beat me to it^^^^^
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:40 pm
e2c
Unfettered
Joined: 30 Sep 2007 Posts: 338 Location: What is this for? Bob's got cancer - We'll miss you bob!
the blood doesnt look tooooooooo bad... i mean ok most of it reminds me of ketchup but ah well..with different lighting it ll b alrite (besides the shaky cam will also distort it a lot)
so we can also be sure the guys in those suits are not "evil" or "sent by the monster" ..they are simply soldiers or medics sent by the army or goverment to help the people or eliminate the crisis. whether or not they are goin to kill the "survivors" or "infected"...thats another question...
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:47 pm
Evil
Veteran
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 83 Location: Behind picture #6
saneman wrote:
I was kinda wondering about the woman's midsection expanding obscenely and the sound effects seeming to imply that she explodes. Did she have lil' monsters in her a la Parasite? A version of the plague that seems to exist? Indigestion? Something else?
After playing that scene over and over, I think that's the creepiest part of this new trailer. What gets me is how the cameraman focuses on that scene - it must be important - and how it cuts out right when you think she'll pop with a disturbing little rumble added in. I can't wait for an HD version, because if there's one thing JJA knows how to do, is to let our imaginations run wild with his imagery.
The existence of Hazmat suits does seem to suggest some sort of infectious component to this madness, besides the threat of being squashed/eaten/maimed, etc. Why not add exploding to the menagerie of "ways to die in a JJA flick"?
In case you missed it, here's an animation of the scene, depicting the "Exploding Woman" (click the animation to see a larger version):
Couple that with the "bleeding from every orifice" pic of Marlena, and a gruesome end comes to mind. Notice that the Exploding Woman's hair (above) matches Marlena's (below). Are we witnessing her death?
Hey, this is all guesswork, and maybe a clean HD trailer will clear this up a bit. This seems to be the scene that people are calling a decapitation, but it does look to be men in Hazmat suits restraining a women who suddenly expands to the point of exploding. Even if it's just a strange lighting effect, it still looks creepy.
Oh, and to those who were wondering if that's a Hazmat suit or a blue screen suit, here's a picture of a red version I found here :
There's even better shots of blue Hazmat suits here .
Finally, this took a while to write up, so there were a ton of new posts since I started. Sorry for any duplicate info! Perhaps we should start a Trailer #2 Analysis thread, so should we wait for the HD version?
_________________"Perception is virtual, not reality" -- Evil, 2007
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:54 pm
Last edited by Evil on Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Polar Bear
Decorated
Joined: 06 Nov 2007 Posts: 232 Location: North Palm Beach, FL
DougBThree wrote:
Um, then why are the photos depicting the party and aftermath on www.1-18-08.com dated and timestamped with that date?
That, and look at the original trailer... News showed time and weather...
no snow in 63°...
(which is odd, because the average low in NY in January is in the 20's-30's, and at midnight , you're definitely looking at that range)
_________________
You're Retarted...
How to use
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:55 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending