Author
Message
Samari
Veteran
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 72 Location: Notre Dame, IN
[INFO] more, different picture strangeness it was pointed out in the chat that when examining the picture of Dana on her blog contains text that it was created using Photoshop 3.0.
release dates for PS3:
Photoshop 3.0, Mac OS: September 1994 Mac - November 1994 Win
Photoshop 3.0.5, Mac OS: May 1996
strange that the picture would be edited on a computer running windows 3.1....
also, whether or not this is relevant i can't say but Marathon was also released in 94
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 4:38 pm
Fraxxxi
Boot
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 38 Location: Austria
Re: [INFO] more, different picture strangeness
Samari wrote:
it was pointed out in the chat that when examining the picture of Dana on her blog contains text that it was created using Photoshop 3.0.
I actually noticed that as well, but didn't think much of it... now that you mention it, it is odd, and an unlikely scenario, so I assume the version number was changed afterwards, maybe as an insider gag for the over-attentive...
_________________So there is hope you see, but we must act with great speed
Assemble the chosen, the ones to lead, and morph them in the likeness of man
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 4:40 pm
sVz
Guest
Re: [INFO] more, different picture strangeness The screenshots from ilovebees.com also is edited with photoshop 3.0, other weirdness with the blog pictures is that there's md5 hashes embedded, some other sort of id ("gid"), plus references to picasa v2.0; as far as i can see from the picasa homepage they're currently at v1.6 (Could this info actually be embedded in the images by blogger? both blogger and picasa are google services)
-- sVz
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 4:53 pm
Aeiri
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 9
sVz wrote:
The screenshots from ilovebees.com also is edited with photoshop 3.0, other weirdness with the blog pictures is that there's md5 hashes embedded, some other sort of id ("gid"), plus references to picasa v2.0; as far as i can see from the picasa homepage they're currently at v1.6 (Could this info actually be embedded in the images by blogger? both blogger and picasa are google services)
-- sVz
If you give me the md5s I can run a password crack on it, I'm using a crack for Linux that can run really fast.
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:01 pm
Mescad
Boot
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 63 Location: Lexington, KY
Re: more, different picture strangeness Those things are added by the blogger software. I verified this myself, by uploading a jpg image from my hard drive through the picaso software (called Hello) for blogger. When I retreived my image from the server, it had added the fields as Dana's photo. The same version numbers, mention of a gid and md5 were all added to my photo.
Check it out at http://mescad.blogspot.com/ to see for yourself if you wish.
Mescad
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:21 pm
hotblack
Boot
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 19
Interesting. I've looked at other jpeg's hosted on photos1.blogger.com and they don't have these funky headers... normal JFIF stuff mostly. That said google only acquired Picaso recently so maybe only recently upload pics get manipulated in this way.
It could be that this is a red herring, but who knows... does anyone know anything more about Picaso/Photoshop file headers? Here's the info from Danatwinging.1.jpg
Code:
00000000 ff d8 ff e0 00 08 50 69 63 61 73 61 ff ed 01 14 |......Picasa....|
00000010 50 68 6f 74 6f 73 68 6f 70 20 33 2e 30 00 38 42 |Photoshop 3.0.8B|
00000020 49 4d 04 04 00 00 00 00 00 f8 1c 02 50 00 0a 50 |IM..........P..P|
00000030 69 63 61 73 61 20 32 2e 30 1c 02 75 00 c2 3c 68 |icasa 2.0..u..<h|
00000040 65 6c 6c 6f 73 74 61 6d 70 3e 0a 20 3c 67 69 64 |ellostamp>. <gid|
00000050 3e 35 63 33 37 62 2d 31 2d 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 |>5c37b-1-fffffff|
00000060 65 2d 36 3c 2f 67 69 64 3e 0a 20 3c 6d 64 35 3e |e-6</gid>. <md5>|
00000070 65 39 63 36 30 64 65 64 2d 35 35 34 39 32 66 34 |e9c60ded-55492f4|
00000080 63 2d 31 30 37 38 65 37 32 66 2d 61 36 38 61 65 |c-1078e72f-a68ae|
00000090 64 39 36 3c 2f 6d 64 35 3e 0a 20 3c 6f 72 69 67 |d96</md5>. <orig|
000000a0 57 69 64 74 68 3e 31 33 36 32 3c 2f 6f 72 69 67 |Width>1362</orig|
000000b0 57 69 64 74 68 3e 0a 20 3c 6f 72 69 67 48 65 69 |Width>. <origHei|
000000c0 67 68 74 3e 31 34 35 35 3c 2f 6f 72 69 67 48 65 |ght>1455</origHe|
000000d0 69 67 68 74 3e 0a 20 3c 6f 72 69 67 53 69 7a 65 |ight>. <origSize|
000000e0 3e 38 39 36 30 35 3c 2f 6f 72 69 67 53 69 7a 65 |>89605</origSize|
000000f0 3e 0a 3c 2f 68 65 6c 6c 6f 73 74 61 6d 70 3e 0a |>.</hellostamp>.|
00000100 1c 02 76 00 1d 3c 70 69 63 61 73 61 73 74 61 6d |..v..<picasastam|
00000110 70 3e 0a 3c 2f 70 69 63 61 73 61 73 74 61 6d 70 |p>.</picasastamp|
00000120 3e 0a ff e0 00 10 4a 46 49 46 00 01 01 00 00 01 |>.....JFIF......|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:28 pm
hotblack
Boot
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 19
Doh.. was posting so missed Mescad's post. Thanks for checking that out :) The helo tags make sense now too. Cheers!
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:30 pm
sVz
Guest
How about the path from the screensshots 'c:\Mappa\site\' anybody seeing any significance in that?
--sVz
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:40 pm
jaybird144
Greenhorn
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 6
'Mappa' is 'map' in Italian. I don't know if it has meaning other than that.
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:45 pm
inio
Decorated
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 163 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
sVz wrote:
How about the path from the screensshots 'c:\Mappa\site\' anybody seeing any significance in that?
This might be getting a little close to the curtain...
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:09 pm
civman2
Boot
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 15
inio wrote:
sVz wrote:
How about the path from the screensshots 'c:\Mappa\site\' anybody seeing any significance in that?
This might be getting a little close to the curtain...
True but they could have easily edited those adress fields if they wanted.
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:32 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending