Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 19, 2024 5:53 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
[SPEC] Is the Flea really the author of the Widow's Journey?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
Author Message
fsmelon
Guest


[SPEC] Is the Flea really the author of the Widow's Journey?

The first line of the story reads "Everything died, and I died with it, but after a timeless time I began to dream, and this is what I dreamed."

Note the use of "I" - only in this first sentence. The rest of the story refers to all the characters in the third person, including the Flea. Why would the flea (or any other 'character') refer to themselves in the third person? The only character not mentioned in the story is the Assassin.

Not saying the Assassin is necessarily the author, but the Flea's English isn't too good anyway - so maybe something else is responsible for the story?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:25 am
 Back to top 
Max Damage
Decorated

Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 178

The Assassin is Dana. The Operator (by the name of The Queen in that particular fable) is convinced that she is the enemy.

There's also mention in the second chapter that while The Operator was 'out of commision', she dreamed, and the dream was based on what the SPDR routine was doing.

It seems that while androids may dream of electric sheep, AI constructs dream of spiders.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:28 am
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
blastcolt
Guest


I take it you support the theory that the pious flea is responsible for the ladybee777 email responses. I agree. I also agree that the widow's story is far too coherent to have come from the pious flea. To my mind, the only introduced entity that is capable of producting that story is the Queen. That doesn't mean that the queen is necessarily the author. It could have been written by someone we're not familiar with yet. However, I think the flea (or whoever the ladybee777 entitiy is) and the widow can be ruled out.

The fact that the story refers to the all the characters in the third person does not, i think, rule out any of the characters from being the speaker (although, it is a very interesting point that I hadn't thought about before). After all, It is a symolic dream, and the dreamer might not be aware of it's full meaning. He or she might not associate himselft/herself with one of the characters even though the connection would seem obvious to us. It's also possible that the dreamer does see a connection the one of the characters but is retelling the dream as it was received, without any comentary or analysis.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:36 pm
 Back to top 
KillerB
Guest


Do we have a translation for the Widow's Story? Like what is going on in reality and not in metaphor? If not I want to do one....

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 1:17 pm
 Back to top 
CoffeeJedi
Unfictologist


Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1327
Location: Charlotte NC, USA

KillerB wrote:
Do we have a translation for the Widow's Story? Like what is going on in reality and not in metaphor? If not I want to do one....


http://bees.netninja.com/wiki/index.php?title=Widow%27s_Journey_-_Computer_Text_Comparison
_________________
seeker > !seek canoe
!splotch


PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 1:20 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
KillerB
Guest


Ok I guess between the "story so far" and that it would pretty much be what I would say anyway....

God I haven't read the books in a long time. But I recall the covenant planting a bug on one of the ships and that is how they find earth. This couldn't be the flea and this can't be the ship can it?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:01 pm
 Back to top 
KillerB
Guest


YEAH! I just remembered the ship limped off from Reach through slipspace....

The ship this AI is on was also at the Reach battle...

could it be that obvious?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:04 pm
 Back to top 
Zenneth
Boot

Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 36

Wow, that's a rather....convincing spec. I don't know much about it thought but I think I'm gonna look into it.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:52 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
KillerB
Guest


I don't know I feel like I might be crossing two events in the storyline...

It would be in The Fall of Reach. Which I currently don't have. Embarassed

It just seems to easy, too obvious for every other Halo fan that has read the books to overlook. But it should definitely be checked.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 3:14 pm
 Back to top 
CorSorei
Veteran

Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 79
Location: EVERYWHERE AND NOWHERE

I'll help this one since I just finished re-reading that book 2 days ago. The ship that the bug was on was the Iriquios whose CO was Capt. Keyes. The ship "limping" away from Reach at the end of the book was the Pillar of Autumn which was Capt. Keyes' new ship for the Spartan's mission. Oh and there was no AI on the Iriquios since they were in short supply. And after the Iriquios got to Reach there was no mention of it again. Hope this clears some things up for you.
_________________
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 5:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Noir
Boot

Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 47

Max Damage wrote:
The Assassin is Dana. The Operator (by the name of The Queen in that particular fable) is convinced that she is the enemy.

There's also mention in the second chapter that while The Operator was 'out of commision', she dreamed, and the dream was based on what the SPDR routine was doing.

It seems that while androids may dream of electric sheep, AI constructs dream of spiders.


I think that, just maybe, more people should listen to you.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:57 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!) » The Haunted Apiary (Let Op!): General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group